Cluster 2637313

Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. Columbia River Gorge Comm’n, 215 Or.App. 557 , 171 P.3d 942, 958-59 (2007) (citing 16 U.S.C. § 544d(c)(4)).

As we noted in Friends of Columbia Gorge, “none of the traditionally recognized aspects of justiciability identified in Yancy — standing, ripeness, or mootness, for that matter — finds the sort of direct textual support in the state constitution that, after Kellas , the court now appears to require.” 215 Or App at 571-72 (emphasis in original).

In Friends of Columbia Gorge v. Columbia River Gorge, 215 Or App 557, 559, 605-06 , 171 P3d 942 (2007) (Friends of Columbia Gorge I), we upheld the validity of the revised management plan in most of the challenged respects, but remanded for the commission to reconsider the portion of the revised plan that concerns expansion of industrial uses in the general management areas (GMAs) of the Scenic Area that are subject to the Act.