How cited: Cluster 2737826 · Go Syfert

Cluster 2737826

green · 18 citation events across 7 courts. Showing the 10 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Quote Authority · Alaska
Corp., 137 S. Ct. 553, 557 (2017) (quoting 12 U.S.C. § 1716b (2012)). 13 Blas I, 2017 WL 1379317 , at *1. 14 Id. at *5. 15 See Rubin v. Fannie Mae, 587 F. App’x 273, 274-75 (6th Cir. 2014) (“[W]e hold that Fannie Mae is not a state actor.
“[W]e hold that Fannie Mae is not a state actor. Accordingly, the foreclosure did not violate the Fifth Amendment.”
Rule Authority · 1st Cir.
Ass'n, 587 F. App'x 273, 275 (6th Cir. 2014)); see also Kerpen v. Metro.
Rule Authority · D.C. Cir.
This is not the first time a plaintiff has advanced this argument, see, e.g., Rubin v. Fannie Mae, 587 Fed.Appx. 273, 275 (6th Cir. 2014); Wright v. Fed.
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
Rubin v. Fannie Mae, 587 Fed.Appx. 273, 276 (6th Cir. 2014).
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
This Court has declined to address such claims, stating that it is “not persuaded that making an other-than-market-value bid at a sheriffs sale constitutes fraud sufficient to set aside [a] foreclosure.” Rubin v. Fannie Mae, 587 Fed.Appx. 273, 276 (6th Cir.2014).
Cited · 6th Cir. · signal: see
See Rubin v. Fannie Mae, 587 Fed.Appx. 273, 276 (6th Cir. 2014); Mich. Comp.
Cited (see also) · S.D. Ohio · signal: see also
Registry of Radiologic Technologists, 342 F. App’x 113, 127 (6th Cir. 2009); see also Rubin v. Fannie Mae, 587 F. App’x 273, 275 (6th Cir. 2014) (concluding that due process claim failed as a matter of law where the defendant was not a state actor); Horen v. Bd. of Educ. of Toledo City Sch.
concluding that due process claim failed as a matter of law where the defendant was not a state actor
Cited (see also) · S.D. Ohio · signal: see also
Registry of Radiologic Technologists, 342 F. App’x 113, 127 (6th Cir. 2009); see also Rubin v. Fannie Mae, 587 F. App’x 273, 275 (6th Cir. 2014) (concluding that due process claim failed as a matter of law where the defendant was not a state actor); Horen v. Bd. of Educ. of Toledo City Sch.
concluding that due process claim failed as a matter of law where the defendant was not a state actor
green Moore v. Garner (2019)
Cited (see also) · S.D. Ohio · signal: see also
Registry of Radiologic Technologists, 342 F. App’x 113, 127 (6th Cir. 2009); see also Rubin v. Fannie Mae, 587 F. App’x 273, 275 (6th Cir. 2014) (concluding that due process claim failed as a matter of law where the defendant was not a state actor); Horen v. Bd. of Educ. of Toledo City Sch.
concluding that due process claim failed as a matter of law where the defendant was not a state actor
Cited (see also) · 6th Cir. · signal: see, e.g. · 2 citations in this opinion
See, e.g., Rubin v. Fannie Mae, 587 Fed.Appx. 273, 274-75 (6th Cir.2014); Bernard v. Fed.