How cited: Cluster 286092 · Go Syfert

Cluster 286092

green · 20 citation events across 13 courts. Showing the 12 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green Hahn v. Apfel (1998)
Rule Authority · S.D. Iowa
In Berven v. Gardner, 414 F.2d 857, 861 (8th Cir.1969), Judge Vogel wrote: [1] Where all of the medical testimony or expert opinions support or tend to support the claim of the appellant that she was disabled within the meaning of the statute in and prior to [the expiration of insured status] and no medical or other testimony appears to the contrary, then we believe that a finding by the Secretary to the effect that disability was not established is not supported by substant…
green Tucker v. Sullivan (1991)
Rule Authority · D. Kan.
See Celebrezze v. Warren, 339 F.2d 833, 838 (10th Cir.1964); Berven v. Gardner, 414 F.2d 857, 860 (8th Cir.1969).
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
See Bastian v. Schweiker; supra, 712 F.2d at 1282 n. 4 (8th Cir.1983); Boyd v. Heckler, 704 F.2d 1207, 1211 (11th Cir.1983); Dousewicz v. Harris, 646 F.2d 771, 774 (2d Cir.1981); Poe v. Harris, 644 F.2d 721 , 723 n. 2 (8th Cir.1981); Gold v. Secretary of H.E.W., 463 F.2d 38, 41-42 (2d Cir.1972); Berven v. Gardner, 414 F.2d 857, 861 (8th Cir.1969).
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
What is extremely remarkable is that in face of the chronic pain syndrome this man has licked his severe alcoholic problem as of 1973.” While Dr. Sanfacon did not treat the appellant during the relevant period before September 30, 1971, his opinion is still entitled to significant weight. “[A] diagnosis of a claimant’s condition may properly be made even several years after the actual onset of the impairment.” Stark v. Weinberger, 497 F.2d 1092, 1097 (7th Cir. 1974), citing …
green Hunley v. Califano (1979)
Rule Authority · E.D. Va.
Allen v. Weinberger, 552 F.2d 781 (7th Cir. 1977), quoting Selig v. Richardson, 379 F.Supp. 594, 601 (E.D.N.Y.1974); accord, Hephner v. Mathews, 574 F.2d 359, 362 (6th Cir. 1978); Berven v. Gardner, 414 F.2d 857, 861 (8th Cir. 1969); Teague v. Gardner, 281 F.Supp. 43, 48 (E.D.Tenn.1968); Bates v. Celebrezze, 234 F.Supp. 349, 354 (W.D.S.C.1964).
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
Berven v. Gardner, 414 F.2d 857, 861 (8th Cir. 1969).
green Boyer v. Califano (1978)
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
The Eighth Circuit in Beryen v. Gardner, 414 F.2d 857, 860 (8th Cir. 1969), stated: Where all of the medical testimony or expert opinions support or tend to support the claim of the appellant that she was disabled within the meaning of the statute in and prior to June 1959 and no medical or other testimony appears to the contrary, then we believe that a finding by the Secretary to the effect that disability was not established is not supported by substantial evidence and mus…
green Behnen v. Califano (1978)
Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.
Berven v. Gardner, 414 F.2d 857, 861 (8th Cir. 1969).
green Selig v. Richardson (1974)
Rule Authority · E.D.N.Y
Moore v. Finch, 418 F.2d 1224, 1226 (4 Cir. 1969) (psychoneurotic anxiety reaction); Berven v. Gardner, 414 F.2d 857, 861 (8 Cir. 1969) (degenerative cerebral disease); Murphy v. Gardner, 379 F.2d 1, 7 (8 Cir. 1967) (cancer); Miller v. Weinberger, 367 F.Supp. 456, 458 (E.D.Tenn.1973) (cardio-vaseular disease and hypertension); Tidwell v. Richardson, CCH Unemp.
degenerative cerebral disease
Rule Authority · 7th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Berven v. Gardner, 414 F.2d 857, 861 (8th Cir. 1969); Murphy v. Gardner, 379 F.2d 1, 7 (8th Cir. 1967).
green Miller v. Weinberger (1973)
Rule Authority · E.D. Tenn.
Berven v. Gardner, C.A. 8th (1969), 414 F.2d 857, 861 [2].
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: accord · 2 citations in this opinion
Jeffcoat v. Bowen, 840 F.2d 592, 596 (8th Cir.1988); accord Berven v. Gardner, 414 F.2d 857, 861 (8th Cir.1969) (mere performance of light household duties does not prove the ability to engage in substantial gainful activity). 31 Second, none of the consultative physicians, relied on so heavily by the majority, ever concluded that Freels could perform heavy work.