How cited: Cluster 294742 · Go Syfert

Cluster 294742

green · 223 citation events across 48 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · D. Maryland
Therefore, in situations where a party is not responsible for the fault of his attorney, dismissal may be invoked only in extreme circumstances.” Reizakis, 490 F.2d at 1135 (citing Industrial Building Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1339 (9th Cir. 1970); Edsall v. Penn Central Transportation Co., 479 F.2d 33, 35 (6th Cir. 1973)).
Rule Authority · D.S.C.
Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1339 (9th Cir. 1970)).
Rule Authority · D. Guam
Co., 651 F.2d 671, 673 (9th Cir. 1981). 14 Prior to dismissing a pleading under rule 41(b) with prejudice, the district court should first adopt 15 other less drastic alternatives.” Id. at 674 (quoting Industrial Building Materials, Inc. v. 16 Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1339 (9th Cir. 1970)) (listing amended complaints and 17 additional time as less drastic alternatives).
green Meyer v. Anderson (2021)
Rule Authority · D.S.C.
Industrial Building Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1339 (9th Cir. 1970); Hillig v. Comm’r, 916 F.2d 171 , 174 (4th Cir. 1990) (“A dismissal sanction is usually inappropriate when it unjustly penalizes a blameless client for the attorney’s behavior.”).
Rule Authority · S.D. Cal.
Bldg. 6 Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1339 (9th Cir. 1970)).
Rule Authority · E.D. Cal.
Materials, Inc. v. 14 Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1339 (9th Cir. 1970).
Rule Authority · Bankr. D.N.J.
Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1343 (9th Cir. 1971); Kleen, 831 F.3d at 930 ; Polyurethane Foam, 799 F.Supp.2d at 800 ).
Rule Authority · S.D. Cal.
Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1343 (9th Cir. 1970) (citing United States v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co., 34 F.Supp. 267 (S.D.N.Y. 1940), and Rayco Mfg.
citing United States v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co., 34 F.Supp. 267 (S.D.N.Y. 1940), and Rayco Mfg. Co. v. Dunn, 234 F.Supp. 593, 598 (N.D. Ill. 1964)
Rule Authority · D. Minnesota
Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1343 (9th Cir.1970) ("One who enters a conspiracy late, with knowledge of what has gone before, and with the intent to pursue the same objective, may be charged with preceding acts in furtherance of the conspiracy.”). .
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1339-40 (9th Cir.1970).
Rule Authority · E.D. Cal.
Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1339 (9th Cir.1970) (“This practice has been condemned because of the possibility that such findings *876 and conclusions, prepared by the non-objective advocate, may not fully and accurately reflect the thoughts entertained by the impartial judge at the time of his initial decision.”).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1339 (9th Cir. 1970).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1339 (9th Cir.1970).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1338-39 (9th Cir.1970).
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1343 (9th Cir.1970).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1339 (9th Cir.1970) (same).
Rule Authority · D.C. Cir.
Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1338-39 (9th Cir.1970).
Rule Authority · Bankr. D. Haw.
Industrial Building Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1339 (9th Cir.1970).” Bush, 496 F.2d 42, 44 .
Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.
See, e.g., Chemetron Corp. v. Business Funds, Inc., 682 F.2d 1149, 1180 (5th Cir.1982); Havoco of America, Ltd. v. Shell Oil Co., 626 F.2d 549, 554 (7th Cir.1980); Myzel v. Fields, 386 F.2d 718, 738 (8th Cir.1967), cert. denied, 390 U.S. 951 , 88 S.Ct. 1043 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1143 (1968); Industrial Building Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1343 (9th Cir.1971).
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
See also Reizakis v. Loy, 490 F.2d 1132, 1136 (4th Cir.1974); Industrial Building Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1339 (9th Cir.1970).
Rule Authority · D. Nev.
Materials, Inc., v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1339 (9th Gir.1970).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1339 (9th Cir. 1970).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1339 (9th Cir.1970).
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
Dismissal of the actions is inappropriate in this case where the noncompliance was solely the fault of the attorney. 2 Carter v. City of Memphis, 636 F.2d 159, 161 (6th Cir.1980); Hassenflu v. Pyke, 491 F.2d 1094, 1095 (5th Cir.1974); Industrial Building Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1339 (9th Cir.1970). 8 Accordingly, the order of dismissal is vacated and the case is remanded to the district court. * The Honorable Henry Woods, United States District…
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
Dismissal of the actions is inappropriate in this case where the noncompliance was solely the fault of the attorney. 2 Carter v. City of Memphis, 636 F.2d 159, 161 (6th Cir.1980); Hassenflu v. Pyke, 491 F.2d 1094, 1095 (5th Cir.1974); Industrial Building Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1339 (9th Cir.1970).
green LaPrade v. Lehman (1985)
Rule Authority · D.C. · 2 citations in this opinion
The landlord states that the witnesses appeared, but then were put on telephone notice and given permission to leave because there were no trial judges available, and no judges were expected to become available that morning. [3] Superior Court Civil Rule 41(b) "is to be construed in light of the meaning of [the corresponding] federal rule." Taylor, 407 A.2d at 590 n. 4; see Beckwith v. Beckwith, 379 A.2d 955 , 959 n. 5 (D.C.1977). [4] See also Tolbert, 623 F.2d at 587 ; Ande…
green Sadler v. Rexair, Inc. (1985)
Rule Authority · D. Mont.
Industrial Building Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1344 (9th Cir.1970).
Rule Authority · Ct. Cl.
See, e.g., Silas v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 586 F.2d at 385 ; Jackson v. Washington Monthly Co., 569 F.2d 119, 122 (D.C.Cir.1977); Industrial Building Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1338-39 (9th Cir.1970).
Rule Authority · Ct. Cl.
See Silas v. Sears Roebuck & Co., 586 F.2d 382, 385 (5th Cir.1978); Industrial Building Materials Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1339 (9th Cir.1970).
green Mack v. Newton (1984)
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
See Lenard v. Argento, 699 F.2d 874, 883 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 84 (1983) (quoting Hoffman-La-Roche, Inc. v. Greenberg, 447 F.2d 872, 875 (7th Cir.1971)); Fisher v. Shamburg, 624 F.2d 156, 162 (10th Cir.1980); Industrial Building Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1343 (9th Cir.1970).
Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.
See Lenard v. Argento, 699 F.2d 874, 883 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 104 S.Ct. 69 , 78 L.Ed.2d 84 (1983) (quoting Hoffman-LaRoche, Inc. v. Greenberg, 447 F.2d 872, 875 (7th Cir.1971)); Fisher v. Shamburg, 624 F.2d 156, 162 (10th Cir.1980); Industrial Building Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1343 (9th Cir.1970). 31 "Since conspiracies, whether among businessmen or others, are rarely evidenced by explicit agreements, the determination of whe…
green Fulton v. Van Slyke (1983)
Rule Authority · Ind. Ct. App.
Therefore, in situations where a party is not responsible for the fault of his attorney, dismissal may be invoked only in extreme circumstances. - Industrial Building Materials Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1339 (Oth Cir.1970).
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.
August 23, 1979) (motion for judgment on the pleadings denied because relevant market might consist solely of Mobil Oil products); Bushie v. Stenocord Corp., 460 F.2d 116, 121 (9th Cir.1972) (“A single manufacturer’s products might be found to comprise, by themselves, a relevant market .... ”); Industrial Building Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1344 (9th Cir.1971) (issue of whether defendant’s line of industrial sealants constituted relevant product m…
Rule Authority · 5th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
This immemorial common-law principle has been widely accepted, see, e.g., Industrial Building Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1343 (9th Cir. 1970); Ratner v. Scientific Resources Corp., 53 F.R.D. 325, 329 (S.D.Fla.1971), appeal dism’d for want of juris., 462 F.2d 616 (5th Cir. 1972) (per curiam); Blackstone Industries, Inc. v. Andre, 232 Ga. 715 , 208 S.E.2d 815, 816 (1974), and is simply a restatement of another well-settled principle of conspiracy la…
Rule Authority · D. Haw.
I. duPont de Nemours & Co., supra, 351 U.S. at 393 , 76 S.Ct. at 1006 ; Industrial Building Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1344 (9th Cir. 1970); A-l Business Machine Co. v. Underwood Corp., 216 F.Supp. 36, 37 (E.D.Pa.1963); V. & L.
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Industrial Building Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1339 (9th Cir. 1970).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
See Heiniger v. City of Phoenix, supra note 8, 625 F.2d at 844 n.4; Photo Electronics Corp. v. England, 581 F.2d 772, 776-77 (9th Cir. 1978); Industrial Building Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1339-40 (9th Cir. 1970).
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
Materials v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1339 (9th Cir. 1971); Davis v. Operation Amigo, Inc., 378 F.2d 101, 103 (10th Cir. 1967).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Industrial Building Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1339 (9th Cir. 1970).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1339 (9th Cir. 1970), this Court expressed its approval of the statements in United States v. Forness, supra, as to the nature and purpose of findings of fact and conclusions of law under Rule 41 and Rule 52, F.R.Civ.P.
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1339-40 (9th Cir. 1970) (, disapproved on other grounds, Kung v. FOM Investment Corp., 563 F.2d 1316, 1318-19 (9th Cir. 1977)). 21 Certainly, the fact that the trial judge has adopted proposed findings does not, by itself, warrant reversal.
, disapproved on other grounds, Kung v. FOM Investment Corp., 563 F.2d 1316, 1318-19 (9th Cir. 1977)
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1339 (9th Cir. 1970), this Court expressed its approval of the statements in United States v. Forness, supra, as to the nature and purpose of findings of fact and conclusions of law under Rule 41 and Rule 52, F.R.Civ.P.
Rule Authority · 10th Cir.
Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1339-40 (9th Cir. 1971).
Rule Authority · 10th Cir.
Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1339-40 (9th Cir. 1971).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1339-40 (9th Cir. 1970) [, disapproved on other grounds, Rung v. FOM Investment Corp., 563 F.2d 1316 , 1318-19 (9th Cir. 1977)].
Rule Authority · N.D. Cal. · signal: cf.
See Rea v. Ford Motor Co., 355 F.Supp. 842, 863-871 (W.D.Pa.1972); cf. Industrial Building Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1341-1343 (9th Cir. 1970).” .
Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.
In the same vein, another court has remarked that A manufacturer has a ‘natural monopoly over his own products, especially when the products are sold under trademark. .’ Industrial Building Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1344 (9th Cir. 1970).
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
Hoifman-LaRoche, Inc. v. Greenberg, 447 F.2d 872, 875 (7th Cir. 1971); Industrial Building Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corporation, 437 F.2d 1336, 1343 (9th Cir. 1970).
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a) Appellants also argue that the district court, in writing its opinion, improperly copied "nearly verbatim the arguments submitted by the federal defendants in support of their motion for summary judgment . . . ." Although this court has warned of the dangers of summarily adopting the proposed findings of the victorious party, See Industrial Building Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1339-40 (9th Cir. 1971), if the content of the distri…
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Appellants also argue that the district court, in writing its opinion, improperly copied “nearly verbatim the arguments submitted by the federal defendants in support of their motion for summary judgment . . .” Although this court has warned of the dangers of summarily adopting the proposed findings of the victorious party, see Industrial Building Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corp., 437 F.2d 1336, 1339-40 (9th Cir. 1971), if the content of the district court’s opinion is…