How cited: Cluster 3028198 · Go Syfert

Cluster 3028198

green · 106 citation events across 15 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Quote Authority · D.N.J.
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 859 (3d Cir. 2007) (“These POMS and HALLEX provisions do not aid [the plaintiff], however, because they lack the force of law and create no judicially-enforceable rights.”) (citations omitted); Burke v. Comm'r of Soc.
“These POMS and HALLEX provisions do not aid [the plaintiff], however, because they lack the force of law and create no judicially-enforceable rights.”
Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.
The Third Circuit has held that HALLEX provisions “lack the force of law and create no judicially-enforceable rights.” Bordes, 235 F. App’x 853, 859 (citing 7The parties consented to magistrate judge jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636 (c).
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 859 (3d Cir. 2007); see also Edelman v. Comm’r of Soc.
Rule Authority · S.D. Fla.
Sec., 235 F. App'x 853, 859 (3d Cir. 2007) (holding that “HALLEX provisions … lack the force of law and create no judicially-enforceable rights”).
holding that “HALLEX provisions … lack the force of law and create no judicially-enforceable rights”
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 857 (3d Cir. 2007).
green LEONARD v. KIJAKAZI (2025)
Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 859 (3d Cir. 2007) (citing Schweiker v. Hansen, 450 U.S. 785, 789 (1981)); see also Barlow-Ahsan v. Kijikazi, Civil No. 21- 2220, 2023 WL 6847559 , at *5 (E.D.
citing Schweiker v. Hansen, 450 U.S. 785, 789 (1981)
green Colon v. Kijakazi (2025)
Rule Authority · D. Del.
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 859 (3d Cir. 2007); Ralston v. Astrue, Civil Action No. 10-548-GMS, 2015 WL 1457627 , at *9-10 (D.
green MOE v. O'MALLEY (2025)
Rule Authority · W.D. Pa.
Sec., 235 Fed.
Rule Authority · W.D. Pa.
Sec., 235 Fed.
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 859 (3d Cir. 2007); Burke v. Comm’r of Soc.
green MILLER v. O'MALLEY (2024)
Rule Authority · W.D. Pa.
Sec., 235 Fed.
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 859 (3d Cir. 2007); see 16 also Edelman v. Comm’r of Soc.
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 859 (3d Cir. 2007) (stating that HALLEX “lack[s] the force of law and create[s] no judicially-enforceable rights”) (citations omitted); Ungemach v. 47 Comm’r of Soc.
stating that HALLEX “lack[s] the force of law and create[s] no judicially-enforceable rights”
Rule Authority · D.N.J. · 2 citations in this opinion
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 859 (3d Cir. 2007); see also Edelman v. Comm’r of Soc.
Rule Authority · D.P.R.
Sec., 235 Fed.
green LEDOUX v. O'MALLEY (2024)
Rule Authority · M.D.N.C.
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 859 (3d Cir. 2007).
green BARLOW-AHSAN v. SAUL (2023)
Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.
Bordes v. Commissioner of Social Sec., 235 Fed.Appx. 853, 859 (3d Cir. 2007) (non-precedential) (quoting Schweiker v. Hansen, 450 U.S. 785, 789 (1981) (Social Security Administration Claims Manual “has no legal force, and ... does not bind the SSA”)); Martinez v. Kijakazi, 2022 WL 118123 , at *2 (E.D.
non-precedential
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 857 (3d Cir. 2007).
Rule Authority · E.D. Pa. · 2 citations in this opinion
Sec., 235 F. App'x 853, 859 (3d Cir. 2007); Edelman v. Comm'r of Soc.
green MIKNIS v. SAUL (2022)
Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 859 (3d Cir. 2007) (non- precedential) (citing Schweiker v. Hansen, 450 U.S. 785, 789 (1981)). 10 The ALJ’s colloquy: “I do want to make you aware you have a right to have an attorney present with you during a hearing.
non- precedential
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 859 (3d Cir. 2007); see also Burke v. Comm'r of Soc.
green Cherry v. Barnhart (2022)
Rule Authority · D. Maryland
Mar. 20, 2014) (citing Newton v. Apfel, 209 F.3d 448 (5th Cir. 2000); Bordes v. Comm’r, 235 F. App’x 853, 859 (3d Cir. 2007); Moore v. Apfel, 216 F.3d 864 , 868–69 (9th Cir. 2000); Calhoun v. Astrue, 2010 WL 297823 (W.D.
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 859 (3d Cir. 2007); see also Burke v. Comm'r of Soc.
green Neale v. Kijakazi (2022)
Rule Authority · D. Del.
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 859 (3d Cir. 2007).
Rule Authority · D.P.R.
Sec., 235 Fed.
green GRIFFIN v. KIJAZAKI (2022)
Rule Authority · W.D. Pa.
Sec., 235 Fed.
green CASSLEY v. KILAKAZI (2022)
Rule Authority · W.D. Pa.
Sec., 235 Fed.
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 859 (3d Cir. 2007); see also Burke v. Comm'r of Soc.
green MARTINEZ v. KIJAKAZI (2022)
Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 859 (3d Cir. 2007); see also Schweiker v. Hansen, 450 U.S. 785, 789 (1981) (“[T]he Claims Manual is not a regulation.
green MARTINEZ v. KIJAKAZI (2022)
Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 859 (3d Cir. 2007); see also Schweiker v. Hansen, 450 U.S. 785, 789 (1981) (“[T]he Claims Manual is not a regulation.
Rule Authority · D.S.C.
Mar. 20, 2014), citing Newton v. Apfel, 209 F.3d 448 (5th Cir. 2000); Bordes v. Comm'r, 235 Fed.
green SERRANO v. SAUL (2021)
Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 859 (3d Cir. 2007).
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
Sec., 481 F. App’x 788, 791 (3d Cir. 2012) (“Internal social security manuals lack the force of law and do not bind the Social Security Administration.”) (citations omitted); Bordes, 235 F. App’x at 859 (stating that HALLEX “lack[s] the force of law and create[s] no judicially-enforceable rights”) (citations omitted); Ungemach v. Comm’r of Soc.
stating that HALLEX “lack[s] the force of law and create[s] no judicially-enforceable rights”
Rule Authority · M.D. Fla.
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 859 (3d Cir. 2007); Moore v. Apfel, 216 F.3d 864, 868-69 (9th Cir. 2000); Hall v. Comm’r of Soc.
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 859 (3d Cir. 2007); see also Burke v. Comm'r of Soc.
green MILLER v. SAUL (2021)
Rule Authority · W.D. Pa.
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 859 (3d Cir. 2007); See Grimm v. Colvin, No. 1:14-CV-1614-TFM, 2015 WL 5123700 , at *5 (W.D.
green KARLIN v. SAUL (2021)
Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 859 (3d Cir. 2007).
Rule Authority · D.N.M.
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 859 (3d Cir. 2007) (unpublished) (citing, e.g., Schweiker, 450 U.S. at 789 ) (holding that POMS “lack the force of law and create no judicially-enforceable rights”); Marelli v. Astrue, No. 2:0-CV-666-DB, 2010 WL 2696636 , at *4 (D.
unpublished
green HARDIN v. SAUL (2020)
Rule Authority · W.D. Pa.
Sec., 235 Fed.
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 859 (3d Cir. 2007) (stating that HALLEX “lack[s] the force of law and create[s] no judicially-enforceable rights”) (citations omitted); Ungemach v. Comm’r of Soc.
stating that HALLEX “lack[s] the force of law and create[s] no judicially-enforceable rights”
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 865-66 (3d Cir. 2007).
green BULLARD v. SAUL (2020)
Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 861 (3d Cir. 2007) (citing Newell v. Comm’r of Soc.
citing Newell v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 347 F.3d 541, 545 (3d Cir. 2003)
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 865-66 (3d Cir. 2007).
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 865-66 (3d Cir. 2007).
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 865-66 (3d Cir. 2007).
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 865-66 (3d Cir. 2007).
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 865-66 (3d Cir. 2007).
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 865-66 (3d Cir. 2007).
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 865-66 (3d Cir. 2007); Podedworny v. Harris, 745 F.2d 210, 221 (3d Cir. 1984).
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
Sec., 235 F. App’x 853, 865-66 (3d Cir. 2007); Podedworny v. Harris, 745 F.2d 210, 221 (3d Cir. 1984).