How cited: Cluster 3029158 · Go Syfert

Cluster 3029158

green · 25 citation events across 3 courts. Showing the 14 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
Sec., 226 F. App’x 203, 208 (3d Cir. 2007) (finding a step three analysis supported by substantial evidence where the ALJ “identified the relevant listings in his opinion, discussed the medical evidence and [the claimant’s] testimony, and explained that the evidence demonstrated that [the claimant’s] impairments do not meet or equal the listing requirements”); Klangwald v. Comm’r of Soc.
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
Sec., 226 F. App’x 203, 208 (3d Cir. 2007) (allowing an ALJ’s analysis of relevant medical evidence in one step of a decision to support the ALJ’s conclusion in another step). that, considering the ALJ’s decision as a whole, the ALJ properly considered whether Plaintiff’s obesity increased the severity or functional limitations of other impairments.
allowing an ALJ’s analysis of relevant medical evidence in one step of a decision to support the ALJ’s conclusion in another step
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
Sec., 226 F. App’x 203, 208 (3d Cir. 2007) (affirming where the ALJ compared evidence in the record to the Commissioner’s Listings requirements and provided a thorough analysis showing he relied on substantial evidence in the decision.) C, The RFC Findings An individual’s RFC is an assessment of their maximum remaining ability to do sustained work activities in an ordinary work setting on a regular and continuing basis, 20 C.F.R. § 404.1545 (a); SSR 96-8p.
affirming where the ALJ compared evidence in the record to the Commissioner’s Listings requirements and provided a thorough analysis showing he relied on substantial evidence in the decision.
Rule Authority · D.N.J. · 2 citations in this opinion
(ECF No. 10 at 15,) For its proposition that the ALI’s decision was proper at step three, Defendant cites the Third Circuit’s decision in Cop v. Commissioner of Social Security, 226 F, App’x 203, 208 (3d Cir. 2007), However, the Third Circuit in Cop explicitly found that it was “not a case where the ALJ failed to identify the relevant listings, discuss the evidence or explain his reasoning . .. [rJather, the ALJ identified the relevant listings in his opinion, discussed the …
Rule Authority · D.N.J. · 6 citations in this opinion
Sec., 226 F. App’x 203, 208 (3d Cir. 2007); see also Domkos v. Colvin, No. 15-2660, 2016 WL 1732380 , at *4 (D.N.J.
Rule Authority · D.N.J. · 3 citations in this opinion
Sec., 226 F. App’x 203, 208 (3d Cir. 2007); see also Domkos v. Colvin, No. 15-2660, 2016 WL 1732380 , at *4 (D.N.J.
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
Sec., 226 F. App’x 203, 208 (3d Cir. 2007))). the outcome.
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
Sec., 226 F. App'x 203, 208 (3d Cir. 2007).
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
Sec., 226 F. App'x 203, 208 (3d Cir. 2007).
Rule Authority · M.D. Penn.
Sec., 226 F. App’x 203, 208 (3d Cir. 2007)).
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
Sec., 226 F. App’x 203, 208 (3d Cir. 2007); see also Jones, 364 F.3d at 505 (the ALJ’s decision must be “read as a whole”).
Rule Authority · M.D. Penn.
Sec., 226 F. App’x 203, 208 (3d Cir. 2007)).
Rule Authority · D.N.J.
Sec., 226 F. App’x 203, 208 (3d Cir. 2007).
green POWELL v. BERRYHILL (2020)
Rule Authority · W.D. Pa.
Sec., 226 F.App’x. 203, 208 (3d Cir. 2007).