Cluster 330696

See Thomas v. Barry, 729 F.2d 1469 , 1470 n. 5 (D.C.Cir.1984); Usery v. Whitin Machine Works, Inc., 554 F.2d 498, 501 (1st Cir.1977); Tri-State Bancorporation, Inc. v. Board of Governors, 524 F.2d 562, 565-66 (7th Cir.1975); Fort Worth National Corp. v. Federal Savings & Loan Insurance Corp., 469 F.2d 47, 58 (5th Cir.1972); cf. Zipes v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 455 U.S. 385, 393-94 , 102 S.Ct. 1127, 1132-33 , 71 L.Ed.2d 234 (1982).

Such internal communications are merely a part of the decisional process in determining the result to be reached on the basis of the record which has been submitted.... [T]he Congressional intent here was to define ‘complete record’ as meaning the facts upon which the agency would pass, not the internal documents relating to the process of that passing.” Tri-State Bancorporation, Inc. v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 524 F.2d 562, 566 (7th Cir. 1975).

The legislative history of § 4(c), discussed in Tri-State Bancorp., Inc. v. Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System, 524 F.2d 562, 564-65 (7 Cir. 1975), makes clear that Congress intended to force speedy Board determinations of applications made to it.

On the other hand, the ninety-one day rule must promote prompt consideration of applications in order that bank holding companies submitting meritorious applications can get on with helping "to meet adequately the financial service needs of the country." See Citicorp v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 2 Cir., 1979, 589 F.2d 1182, 1186, 1187 ; Central Wisconsin Bankshares v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 7 Cir., 1978, 583 F.2d 294, 296 ; …

On the other hand, the ninety-one day rule must promote prompt consideration of applications in order that bank holding companies submitting meritorious applications can get on with helping “to meet adequately the financial service needs of the country.” See Citicorp v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 2 Cir., 1979, 589 F.2d 1182, 1186, 1187 ; Central Wisconsin Bankshares v. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, 7 Cir., 1978, 583 F.2d 294, 296 ; …

In Tri-State, supra note 5 , 524 F.2d at 564, 566 , the court rejected the Board’s argument that staff reports re-started the time period, but the Board did not argue that any new outside information had been received. 15 .

Tri-State Bancorporation, supra at 564.

See 524 F.2d at 567 .