Cluster 339380

green · 38 citation events across 14 courts. Showing the 24 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 24

green Todd Hess v. Martin J. O'Malley (2024)

Rule Authority · 7th Cir.

See Smolen v. Chater, 80 F.3d 1273, 1280 (9th Cir. 1996) (collecting cases); Reading v. Mathews, 542 F.2d 993, 997 (7th 17 Cir. 1976).

green Wilcox v. Commissioner of Social Security (2023)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ind.

Ind. Feb. 19, 2010). techniques.” Id. §§ 423(d)(3), 1382c(a)(3)(D); Reading v. Mathews, 542 F.2d 993, 997 (7th Cir. 1976) (citation omitted).

citation omitted

green (SS) Martin v. Commissioner of Social Security (2023)

Rule Authority · E.D. Cal.

Reading v. Mathews, 542 F.2d 993, 997 (7th Cir. 1976); 20 Moore v. Comm’r of Soc.

green Martin v. Barnhart (2007)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ind.

Reading v. Mathews, 542 F.2d 993, 997 (7th Cir.1976) (citing, Jeralds, 445 F.2d at 38-39 ).

green Marnell v. Barnhart (2003)

Rule Authority · N.D. Iowa

See, e.g., Smolen v. Chater, 80 F.3d 1273, 1280 (9th Cir.1996) (“claimant must be disabled continuously and without interruption” beginning before 22nd birthday until time he applies for child’s DI benefits) (citing Suarez v. Sec’y of Health & Human Servs., 755 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1985) (subsequent history omitted); Reading v. Mathews, 542 F.2d 993, 997 (7th Cir.1976); Futernick v. Richardson, 484 F.2d 647, 648 (6th Cir.1973); Reyes v. Sec’y of H.E.W., 476 F.2d 910, 914 (D.C.…

green Ricci v. Apfel (2001)

Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.

See, e.g., Suarez v. Sec’y of Health and Human Servs., 755 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 844 , 106 S.Ct. 133 , 88 L.Ed.2d 109 (1985), and reh’g denied, 474 U.S. 1097 , 106 S.Ct. 872 , 88 L.Ed.2d 911 (1986); Reading v. Mathews, 542 F.2d 993, 997 (7th Cir.1976); Futernick v. Richardson, 484 F.2d 647, 648 (6th Cir.1973); Reyes v. Sec’y of Health, Educ. and Welfare, 476 F.2d 910, 914 (D.C.Cir.1973).

green 50 soc.sec.rep.ser. 500, unempl.ins.rep. (Cch) P 15161b, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2159, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R… (1996)

Rule Authority · 9th Cir.

See, e.g., Suarez v. Secretary of Health and Human Servs., 755 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 844 , 106 S.Ct. 133 , 88 L.Ed.2d 109 (1985), and reh'g denied, 474 U.S. 1097 , 106 S.Ct. 872 , 88 L.Ed.2d 911 (1986); Reading v. Mathews, 542 F.2d 993, 997 (7th Cir.1976); Futernick v. Richardson, 484 F.2d 647, 648 (6th Cir.1973); Reyes v. Secretary of Health, Educ. and Welfare, 476 F.2d 910, 914 (D.C.Cir.1973). 17 Although Smolen did not apply for disabled child's…

green Smolen v. Chater (1996)

Rule Authority · 9th Cir.

See, e.g., Suarez v. Secretary of Health and Human Servs., 755 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 844 , 106 S.Ct. 133 , 88 L.Ed.2d 109 (1985), and reh’g denied, 474 U.S. 1097 , 106 S.Ct. 872 , 88 L.Ed.2d 911 (1986); Reading v. Mathews, 542 F.2d 993, 997 (7th Cir.1976); Futernick v. Richardson, 484 F.2d 647, 648 (6th Cir.1973); Reyes v. Secretary of Health, Educ. and Welfare, 476 F.2d 910, 914 (D.C.Cir.1973).

green Wanda S. FLATEN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant-Appellee (1995)

Rule Authority · 9th Cir.

Interpreting analogous provisions for child disability benefits, the Seventh Circuit reached the same result, holding that a claimant is entitled to benefits only if the disability is one “which began prior to age 22 [the time at which insured status lapsed] and continued up to the time of application.” Reading v. Mathews, 542 F.2d 993, 997 (7th Cir.1976). 3.

green McCarver v. Secretary of Health & Human Services of the United States (1989)

Rule Authority · C.D. Ill.

Reading v. Mathews, 542 F.2d 993, 997 (7th Cir.1976).

green Cowan v. Bowen (1987)

Rule Authority · D.D.C.

Reading v. Mathews, 542 F.2d 993, 997 (7th Cir.1976); Davis, 566 F.Supp. at 1195 .

green Troupe v. Heckler (1985)

Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.

Reading v. Mathews, 542 F.2d 993, 997 (7th Cir.1976).

green Carmen M. SUAREZ, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, Appellant (1985)

Rule Authority · 1st Cir.

Reading v. Mathews, 542 F.2d 993, 997 (7th Cir.1976); Futernick v. Richardson, 484 F.2d 647, 648 (6th Cir. 1973); Reyes v. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, 476 F.2d 910, 914 (D.C.Cir.1973). 3 *4 We therefore hold that the A.L.J. was guided by the proper standard in looking for evidence of claimant’s continuing total disability after 1946.

green Franklin v. Heckler (1984)

Rule Authority · D.N.J.

Reading v. Mathews, 542 F.2d 993, 997 (7th Cir.1976); Jolley v. Weinberger, 537 F.2d 1179, 1181 (4th Cir.1976); Reyes v. Harris, 476 F.2d 910, 914 (D.C.Cir.1973); Beane v. Richardson, 457 F.2d 758, 759 (9th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 859 , 93 S.Ct. 144 , 34 L.Ed.2d 105 (1973).

green Spena v. Heckler (1984)

Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.

Rutherford v. Schweiker, 685 F.2d 60, 62 (2d Cir.1982), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1212 , 103 S.Ct. 1207 , 75 L.Ed.2d 447 (1983); Reading v. Mathews, 542 F.2d 993, 997 (7th Cir.1976).

green Winston v. Heckler (1984)

Rule Authority · D.N.J.

Reading v. Mathews, 542 F.2d 993, 997 (7th Cir.1976); Jolley v. Weinberger, 537 F.2d 1179, 1181 (4th Cir.1976); Reyes v. Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare, 476 F.2d 910, 914 (D.C.Cir.1973); Beane v. Richardson, 457 F.2d 758, 759 (9th Cir.1972), cert. denied, 409 U.S. 859 , 93 S.Ct. 144 , 34 L.Ed.2d 105 (1973).

green Scanlon v. Heckler (1984)

Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.

Reading v. Mathews, 542 F.2d 993, 997 (7th Cir.1976).

green Delgado v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (1983)

Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y.

Reading v. Mathews, 542 F.2d 993, 997 (7th Cir.1976).

green Axe v. Harris (1980)

Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.

Some nondisabling physical condition is not sufficient.” Reading v. Matthews, supra at 997.

green Sarah Lieberman v. Joseph Califano, Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare (1979)

Rule Authority · 7th Cir. · 8 citations in this opinion

SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE Having concluded that the administrative law judges applied the correct legal standard, the only remaining question is whether the Secretary’s findings of fact, as well as the inferences drawn therefrom, were supported by substantial evidence. 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g); Reading v. Mathews, 542 F.2d 993, 997-98 (7th Cir. 1976).

green Zharn v. Commissioner of Social Security (2002)

Cited · 6th Cir. · signal: see

See Reading v. Mathews, 542 F.2d 993, 997 (7th Cir.1976); Futernick v. Richardson, 484 F.2d 647, 648 (6th Cir.1973) (per curiam).

green Alexandrou v. Sullivan (1991)

Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see

See Bastien, Reading v. Mathews, 542 F.2d 993, 997 (7th Cir.1976).

green Bolinger v. Barnhart (2006)

Cited (see also) · N.D. Ind. · signal: see also

Jeralds, 445 F.2d at 38-39 ; See also Reading v. Mathews, 542 F.2d 993, 997 (7th Cir.1976).

green Ottman v. Barnhart (2004)

Cited (see also) · N.D. Ind. · signal: see also

Jeralds, 445 F.2d at 38-39 ; See also Reading v. Mathews, 542 F.2d 993, 997 (7th Cir.1976).