Cluster 362445
green
· 47 citation events
across 12 courts.
Showing the 14 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green
Strang v. Marsh (1985)
Jmt., at 31 (quoting Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn and Queens v. N.L.R.B., 589 F.2d 1166, 1174 (2d Cir.1978)).
green
Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, Federal Aviation Admi… (1982)
In Catholic Medical Center, detailed evidence was accepted and findings made, but these were then excluded from consideration in the agency's decision. 589 F.2d at 1169-70.
In Catholic Medical Center, detailed evidence was accepted and findings made, but these were then excluded from consideration in the agency’s decision. 589 F.2d at 1169-70.
green
Petition of Central Vt. Public Service Corp. (1982)
Cir. 1979); Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn and Queens, Inc. v. NLRB, 589 F.2d 1166, 1170 (2d Cir. 1978).
Ctr. of Brooklyn & Queens v. NLRB, 589 F.2d 1166, 1175 (2d Cir. 1978). 7 .
green
The Catholic Medical Center Of Brooklyn And Queens, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board (1980)
We held in our earlier opinion, with which familiarity is assumed, that the Board erred in reaching its § 8(a)(5) determination by limiting its consideration of the Center's objections to the election, which were based on supervisory activity on behalf of the Union, to those activities occurring after the filing of the later of two election petitions, 589 F.2d at 1169-74; at the very least, we directed, the Board must consider supervisory conduct occurring subsequent to the …
We held in our earlier opinion, with which familiarity is assumed, that the Board erred in reaching its § 8(a)(5) determination by limiting its consideration of the Center’s objections to the election, which were based on supervisory activity on behalf of the Union, to those activities occurring after the filing of the later of two election petitions, 589 F.2d at 1169-74; at the very least, we directed, the Board must consider supervisory conduct occurring subsequent to the …
See Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn and Queens, Inc. v. NLRB, 589 F.2d 1166 , 1170 n.4 (2d Cir. 1978) (NLRB “probably” need not follow rules of evidence at representation proceedings); Riverside Press, Inc. v. NLRB, 415 F.2d 281, 283 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 912 , 90 S.Ct. 915 , 25 L.Ed.2d 94 (1970) (rules of evidence “not controlling” at representation proceeding).
NLRB “probably” need not follow rules of evidence at representation proceedings
green
Beth Israel Hospital and Geriatric Center v. National Labor Relations Board, and Beth Israel Federation of Nu… (1982)
See Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn and Queens, Inc. v. NLRB, 589 F.2d 1166 , 1170 n.4 (2d Cir. 1978) (NLRB "probably" need not follow rules of evidence at representation proceedings); Riverside Press, Inc. v. NLRB, 415 F.2d 281, 283 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 912 , 90 S.Ct. 915 , 25 L.Ed.2d 94 (1970) (rules of evidence "not controlling" at representation proceeding).
NLRB "probably" need not follow rules of evidence at representation proceedings
See Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn and Queens, Inc. v. NLRB, 589 F.2d 1166, 1170-74 (2d Cir. 1978).
green
Greenstein, Ex Rel. Horowitz v. Bane (1993)
Corp. v. Perales, 954 F.2d at 861-62 ; see also Catholic Medical Ctr., Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 589 F.2d 1166, 1174 (2d Cir.1978) (agency’s unexplained decision in deviating from precedent “is archetypical of arbitrary and capricious behavior”).
green
National Labor Relations Board v. Island Film Processing Co., Inc., D/B/A Kahala Kai Photo Service (1986)
See also Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn and Queens, Inc. v. NLRB, 589 F.2d 1166, 1173 (1978), appeal on remand, 620 F.2d 20 (2nd Cir.1980).
green
National Labor Relations Board v. L & J Equipment Co., Inc., United Mine Workers of America, Intervenor (1984)
See also Catholic Medical Center of Brooklyn and Queens v. NLRB, 589 F.2d 1166 (2d Cir.1978) (rejecting as arbitrary and capricious the Board’s refusal to consider evidence of misconduct occurring between the filing of two representation petitions).
See also Catholic Medical Center v. NLRB, 589 F.2d 1166 (2d Cir.1978); NLRB v. Process and Pollution Control Co., 588 F.2d 786 (10th Cir.1978).