How cited: Cluster 37203 · Go Syfert

Cluster 37203

green · 39 citation events across 7 courts. Showing the 31 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green Sullivan v. Feldman (2020)
Quote Authority · S.D. Tex.
Coca-Cola Employees’ Union of Lake Charles, No. 1060 v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. United, 114 F. App’x 137, 140 (5th Cir. 2004) (“To ‘make it clear’ that an employer refuses to arbitrate, circuit courts have held that one of the parties must take the unequivocal position that it will not arbitrate.”); PaineWebber Inc. v. Faragalli, 61 F.3d 1063, 1066 (3d Cir. 1995) (“[W]e hold that an action to compel arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act accrues only when the responden…
“To ‘make it clear’ that an employer refuses to arbitrate, circuit courts have held that one of the parties must take the unequivocal position that it will not arbitrate.”
green Sullivan v. Feldman (2020)
Quote Authority · S.D. Tex.
Coca-Cola Employees’ Union of Lake Charles, No. 1060 v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. United, 114 F. App’x 137, 140 (5th Cir. 2004) (“To ‘make it clear’ that an employer refuses to arbitrate, circuit courts have held that one of the parties must take the unequivocal position that it will not arbitrate.”); PaineWebber Inc. v. Faragalli, 61 F.3d 1063, 1066 (3d Cir. 1995) (“[W]e hold that an action to compel arbitration under the Federal Arbitration Act accrues only when the responden…
“To ‘make it clear’ that an employer refuses to arbitrate, circuit courts have held that one of the parties must take the unequivocal position that it will not arbitrate.”
green Ward v. Jones (2019)
Quote Authority · E.D. La.
No. 1060 v. Coca–Cola Bottling Co. United, Inc., 114 F. App’x 137, 143 (5th Cir. 2004) (“Relief under Rule 59(e) is an extraordinary remedy that should be used sparingly.”).
“Relief under Rule 59(e) is an extraordinary remedy that should be used sparingly.”
Rule Authority · E.D. La.
Coca-Cola Emps.’ Union of Lake Charles, No. 1060 v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. United, Inc., 114 F. App’x 137, 143 (5th Cir. 2004).
Rule Authority · E.D. La.
Coca-Cola Emps.’ Union of Lake Charles, No. 1060 v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. United, Inc., 114 F. App’x 137, 143 (5th Cir. 2004).
Rule Authority · E.D. La.
Union of Lake Charles, No. 1060 v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. United, Inc., 114 F. App’x 137, 143 (5th Cir. 2004).
green Tijerino v. Miller (2025)
Rule Authority · E.D. La.
Coca-Cola Emps.’ Union of Lake Charles, No. 1060 v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. United, Inc., 114 F. App’x 137, 143 (5th Cir. 2004).
green Tijerino v. Miller (2025)
Rule Authority · E.D. La.
Coca-Cola Emps.’ Union of Lake Charles, No. 1060 v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. United, Inc., 114 F. App’x 137, 143 (5th Cir. 2004).
Rule Authority · E.D. La.
Coca-Cola Emps.’ Union of Lake Charles, No. 1060 v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. United, Inc., 114 F. App’x 137, 143 (5th Cir. 2004).
Rule Authority · E.D. La.
Coca- Cola Emps.’ Union of Lake Charles, No. 1060 v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. United, Inc., 114 F. App’x 137, 143 (5th Cir. 2004).
Rule Authority · W.D. La. · 2 citations in this opinion
Coca–Cola Employees’ Union of Lake Charles, No. 1060 v. Coca– Cola Bottling Co. United, Inc., 114 F. App’x 137, 143-44 (5th Cir. 2004) (unpublished) (holding that party’s failure to raise an argument in opposition to summary judgment waived the argument).
unpublished
Rule Authority · W.D. La.
Coca–Cola Employees’ Union of Lake Charles, No. 1060 v. Coca–Cola Bottling Co. United, Inc., 114 F. App’x 137, 143-44 (5th Cir. 2004) (unpublished) (holding that party’s failure to raise an argument in opposition to summary judgment waived the argument).
unpublished
Rule Authority · E.D. La.
Coca-Cola Emps.’ Union of Lake Charles, No. 1060 v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. United, Inc., 114 F. App’x 137, 143 (5th Cir. 2004).
Rule Authority · N.D. Tex.
Coca-Cola Emps.’ Union of Lake Charles, No. 1060 v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. United, Inc., 114 F. App’x 137, 143 (5th Cir. 2004).
green Lique, LLC v. Nicolosi (2021)
Rule Authority · E.D. La.
Coca- Cola Emps.’ Union of Lake Charles, No. 1060 v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. United, Inc., 114 F. App’x 137, 143 (5th Cir. 2004).
green Starks v. Davis (2021)
Rule Authority · N.D. Tex.
Coca-Cola Emps.’ Union of Lake Charles, No. 1060 v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. United, Inc., 114 F. App’x 137, 143 (5th Cir. 2004).
Rule Authority · E.D. La.
Union of Lake Charles, No. 1060 v. Coca–Cola Bottling Co. United, Inc., 114 F. App'x 137, 143 (5th Cir. 2004) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
Rule Authority · E.D. La.
Coca-Cola Emps.’ Union of Lake Charles, No. 1060 v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. United, Inc., 114 F. App’x 137, 143 (5th Cir. 2004). 20 R.
Rule Authority · E.D. La.
Coca-Cola Emps.’ Union of Lake Charles, No. 1060 v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. United, Inc., 114 F. App’x 137, 143 (5th Cir. 2004).
Rule Authority · E.D. La.
Coca-Cola Employees’ Union of Lake Charles, No. 1060 v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. United, Inc., 114 F. App’x 137, 143 (5th Cir. 2004) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
Rule Authority · E.D. La.
Coca-Cola Employees’ Union of Lake Charles, No. 1060 v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. United, Inc., 114 F. App’x 137, 143 (5th Cir. 2004) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
Rule Authority · E.D. La.
Coca-Cola Employees’ Union of Lake Charles, No. 1060 v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. United, Inc., 114 F. App’x 137, 143 (5th Cir. 2004) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
green In Re: Tara Crosby LLC (2020)
Rule Authority · E.D. La.
Coca-Cola Employees’ Union of Lake Charles, No. 1060 v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. United, Inc., 114 F. App’x 137, 143 (5th Cir. 2004) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
Rule Authority · E.D. La.
Coca-Cola Employees’ Union of Lake Charles, No. 1060 v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. United, Inc., 114 F. App’x 137, 143 (5th Cir. 2004) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
Rule Authority · E.D. La.
Union of Lake Charles, No. 1060 v. Coca–Cola Bottling Co. United, Inc., 114 F. App’x 137, 143 (5th Cir. 2004) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
Rule Authority · E.D. La.
Coca-Cola Employees’ Union of Lake Charles, No. 1060 v. Coca–Cola Bottling Co. United, Inc., 114 F. App’x 137, 143 (5th Cir. 2004) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
green Robicheaux v. Caldwell (2013)
Rule Authority · E.D. La.
Coca-Cola Employees’ Union of Lake Charles, No. 1060 v. Cocar-Cola Bottling Co. United, Inc., 114 Fed.Appx. 137, 143 (5th Cir.2004) (citing Templet, 367 F.3d at 479 ).
Rule Authority · E.D. La.
Coca-Cola Employees’ Union of Lake Charles, No. 1060 v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. United, Inc., 114 Fed.Appx. 137, 143 (5th Cir.2004) (citing Templet, 367 F.3d at 479 ).
Rule Authority · N.D. Okla. · 4 citations in this opinion
Union of Lake Charles v. Cocar-Cola Bottling Co., 114 Fed.Appx. 137, 141-42 (8th Cir.2004) (unpublished).
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
Coca-Cola Employees’ Union of Lake Charles v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. United Inc., 114 F. App’x 137, 142 (5th Cir. 2004) (unpublished) (distinguishing Aluminum Brick because “there is no record evidence that Coca-Cola engaged in any conduct subsequent to its . . . letter that could be seen as casting doubt on its stated position.”); Int’l Ass’n of Machinists v. Caribe, 913 F. Supp. 105, 109 (D.
unpublished
Rule Authority · 6th Cir.
Coca-Cola Employees’ Union of Lake Charles v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. United Inc., 114 Fed.Appx. 137, 142 (5th Cir.2004) (unpublished) (distinguishing Aluminum Brick because “there is no record evidence that Coca-Cola engaged in any conduct subsequent to its ... letter that could be seen as casting doubt on its stated position.”); Int'l Ass’n of Machinists v. Caribe, 913 F.Supp. 105, 109 (D.P.R.1996) (holding that a letter from the company to the union requesting clarificatio…