How cited: Cluster 391158 · Go Syfert

Cluster 391158

green · 84 citation events across 14 courts. Showing the 29 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
"To protect the integrity of the federal regulatory scheme," Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Kramarsky, 650 F.2d 1287, 1292 (2d Cir.1981), ERISA expressly preempts "any and all State laws insofar as they may now or hereafter relate to any employee benefit plan" covered by the statute, 29 U.S.C. § 1144 (a). "[T]he express preemption provisions of ERISA are deliberately expansive," Pilot Life Ins.
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
“To protect the integrity of the federal regulatory scheme,” Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Kramarsky, 650 F.2d 1287, 1292 (2d Cir.1981), ERISA expressly preempts “any and all State laws insofar as they may now or hereafter relate to any employee benefit plan” covered by the statute, 29 U.S.C. § 1144 (a). “[T]he express preemption provisions of ERISA are deliberately expansive,” Pilot Life Ins.
Rule Authority · 2d Cir. · 4 citations in this opinion
As retirees do not, and cannot, claim that the plans involved here are free from ERISA's coverage, they cannot claim the exception to preemption restricted to laws governing such exempted plans. 39 Id. 40 In ruling the section 1003(b)(3) exemption inapplicable, Stone also relied upon Delta Air Lines v. Kramarsky, 650 F.2d 1287, 1306 (2d Cir.), modified, 666 F.2d 21 (2d Cir.1981), aff'd in part, vacated in part sub nom.
Rule Authority · 2d Cir. · 4 citations in this opinion
In ruling the section 1003(b)(3) exemption inapplicable, Stone also relied upon Delta Air Lines v. Kramarsky, 650 F.2d 1287, 1306 (2d Cir.), modified, 666 F.2d 21 (2d Cir.1981), aff'd in part, vacated in part sub nom.
Rule Authority · S.D.N.Y. · 2 citations in this opinion
See League of Women Voters v. Nassau County Board of Supervisors, 737 F.2d 155 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1108 , 105 S.Ct. 783 , 83 L.Ed.2d 778 (1985); Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Kramarsky, 650 F.2d 1287, 1295 (2d Cir.1981), aff'd in part and vacated in part, 666 F.2d 21 (2d Cir.1981), aff'd in part, vacated in part and remanded sub nom., Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 , 103 S.Ct. 2890 , 77 L.Ed.2d 490 (1983).
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Kramarsky, 650 F.2d 1287, 1303 (2d Cir.1981), modified on other grounds sub nom.
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Kramarsky, 650 F.2d 1287, 1303 (2d Cir.1981), modified on other grounds sub nom.
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Kramarsky, 650 F.2d 1287, 1304 (2d Cir.), vacated in part on other grounds, 666 F.2d 21 (2d Cir.1981), aff'd in part, vacated in part sub nom.
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Kramarsky, 650 F.2d 1287, 1304 (2d Cir.), vacated in part on other grounds, 666 F.2d 21 (2d Cir.1981), aff'd in part, vacated in part sub nom.
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
Admittedly, as appellant argues, the ERI-SA preemption provision was designed to have a sweeping preemptive effect in the employee benefit plan field, and the various exceptions to preemption are meant to be “narrow.” Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Kramarsky, 650 F.2d 1287, 1304 (2d Cir.), vacated in part on other grounds, 666 F.2d 21 (2d Cir.1981), prob. juris, noted, 456 U.S. 924 , 102 S.Ct. 1968 , 72 L.Ed.2d 439 (1982).
Rule Authority · SCOTUS · 2 citations in this opinion
Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Kramarsky, 650 F. 2d 1287, 1304 (1981).
Rule Authority · D. Conn. · 2 citations in this opinion
Particularly because state law does not compel employers to establish programs of this sort, it would be sensible to say .. . that such programs are not maintained ‘solely’ to comply with state laws . . . . ” Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Kramarsky, 650 F.2d 1287, 1306 (2d Cir. 1981).
Rule Authority · D. Maryland · 4 citations in this opinion
Although the Second Circuit had summarily affirmed Judge Newman’s decision in Pervel, holding that section 514(a) of ERISA preempted a similar Connecticut statute, the panel in Delta Air Lines considered Mountain States and Minnesota Mining to have answered in the negative the question of whether ERI- *548 SA preempted the HRL. 650 F.2d at 1294-95. 19 The other state law addressed in Delta Air Lines was New York’s Disability Benefit Law (DBL).
Cited · Pa. Commw. Ct. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Kramarsky, 650 F.2d 1287, 1295 (2d Cir.1981), aff'd in part and vacated in part, 666 F.2d 21 (1981), aff'd in part, vacated in part and remanded sub nom.; Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 , 103 S.Ct. 2890 , 77 L.Ed.2d 490 (1983) ("In attempting to apply the rule resulting from ... a summary decision ... lower courts must undertake a careful analysis of the precise `reach and content' of the Supreme Court's action.") See generally, Note,…
Cited · D. Conn. · signal: accord
Trades Council, Millmen’s Union, Local 2020 v. Garmon, 359 U.S. 236, 244 , 79 S.Ct. 773 , 3 L.Ed.2d 775 (1959); accord Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Kramarsky, 650 F.2d 1287, 1299 (2d Cir.1981).
Cited · D. Conn. · signal: accord
Trades Council, Millmen’s Union, Local 2020 v. Garmon, 359 U.S. 236, 244 , 79 S.Ct. 773 , 3 L.Ed.2d 775 (1959); accord Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Kramarsky, 650 F.2d 1287, 1299 (2d Cir.1981).
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see
See Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Kramarsky, 650 F.2d 1287 (2d Cir.1981).
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see
See Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Kramarsky, 650 F.2d 1287 (2d Cir.1981).
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see
See Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Kramarsky, 650 F.2d 1287, 1290 (2d Cir.), modified, 666 F.2d 21 (2d Cir.1981), aff'd in part, vacated in part, 463 U.S. 60 , 103 S.Ct. 2875 , 77 L.Ed.2d 469 (1983).
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see
See Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Kramarsky, 650 F.2d 1287, 1290 (2d Cir.), modified, 666 F.2d 21 (2d Cir.1981), aff'd in part, vacated in part, 463 U.S. 60 , 103 S.Ct. 2875 , 77 L.Ed.2d 469 (1983).
Cited · D. Utah · signal: see
See, Delta Air Lines v. Kramarsky, 650 F.2d 1287 , 1300 (2d Cir.1981), vacated in part and rev’d, 666 F.2d 21 (1981), aff'd in part and vacated in part, Shaw v. Delta Airlines, Inc., 463 U.S. 85 , 103 S.Ct. 2890 , 77 L.Ed.2d 490 (1983). 6 We must therefore examine the conflict between the UADA and Rule 115 and the nature of the federal and state interests according to the Garmon framework while being "guided by respect for the separate spheres of governmental authority prese…
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see
See Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Kramarsky, 650 F.2d 1287, 1295 (2d Cir.1981), aff'd in part and vacated in part, 666 F.2d 21 (1981), aff'd in part, vacated in part and remanded sub nom.
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see
See Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Kramarsky, 650 F.2d 1287, 1295 (2d Cir.1981), aff'd in part and vacated in part, 666 F.2d 21 (1981), aff'd in part, vacated in part and remanded sub nom.
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see
See, Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Kramarsky, 650 F.2d 1287, 1306 (2d Cir. 1981).
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see
See Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Kramarsky, 650 F.2d 1287, 1306 (2d Cir. 1981).
Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
Alessi 101 S.Ct. at 1906; Woodfork v. Marine Cooks & Stewards Union, 642 F.2d 966, 969-74 (5th Cir. 1981); see Delta Airlines v. Kramarsky, 666 F.2d 21, 24-25 (2d Cir. 1981), modifying 2nd Cir. 650 F.2d 1287 , prob. juris, noted - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 1968 , 72 L.Ed.2d 439 (1982); Murphy v. Heppenstall Co., 635 F.2d 233, 237 (3d Cir. 1980), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 102 S.Ct. 999 , 71 L.Ed.2d 293 (1982); Kapuscinski v. Plan Administrator, etc., 658 F.2d 427, 430 (6th Cir. 1981); …
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see
See 650 F.2d at 1291-92.
green Calhoon v. Bonnabel (1982)
Cited (see also) · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see also
See also Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Kramarsky, 650 F.2d 1287, 1303 (2d Cir.1981) (the legislative history of § 1441 “leads us to conclude that the statute is as sweeping as it seems.”); Stone & Webster Engineering Corp. v. Ilsley, 518 F.Supp. 1297, 1300 (D.Conn.1981).