How cited: Cluster 396955 · Go Syfert

Cluster 396955

green · 36 citation events across 14 courts. Showing the 22 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Quote Authority · 10th Cir.
Bd., Inc. v. Andrus, 664 F.2d 229, 233 (10th Cir. 1981) (“The exclusive jurisdiction, of the Court of Claims [over claims seeking money damages from the federal government] cannot be avoided by framing a district court complaint to 'appear to seek only injunc-tive, mandatory, or declaratory relief.”).
“The exclusive jurisdiction, of the Court of Claims [over claims seeking money damages from the federal government] cannot be avoided by framing a district court complaint to 'appear to seek only injunc-tive, mandatory, or declaratory relief.”
Rule Authority · 10th Cir.
Bd., Inc. v. Andrus, 664 F.2d 229, 233 (10th Cir.1981)).
Rule Authority · 10th Cir.
Bd., Inc. v. Andrus, 664 F.2d 229, 232 (10th Cir.1981).
Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.
Bd., Inc. v. Andrus, 664 F.2d 229, 233 (10th Cir.1981).
Rule Authority · D. Kan.
Colorado Department of Highways, 840 F.2d at 755 ; Rogers v. Ink, 766 F.2d at 434 ; State of New Mexico v. Regan, 745 F.2d at 1322 ; Amalgamated Sugar, 664 F.2d at 824 ; Alamo Navajo School Board, Inc. v. Andrus, 664 F.2d 229, 233 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 963 , 102 S.Ct. 2041 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982).
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
Instrument, Inc. v. United States, 715 F.2d 713, 727 (2d Cir.1983); Alamo Navajo School Bd., Inc. v. Andrus, 664 F.2d 229, 233 (10th Cir.1981); Hoopa Valley Tribe v. United States, 596 F.2d 435, 436 , 219 Ct.Cl. 492 (1979).
Rule Authority · 5th Cir.
Instrument, Inc. v. United States, 715 F.2d 713, 727 (2d Cir.1983); Alamo Navajo School Bd., Inc. v. Andrus, 664 F.2d 229, 233 (10th Cir.1981); Hoopa Valley Tribe v. United States, 596 F.2d 435, 436 , 219 Ct.Cl. 492 (1979).
Rule Authority · 10th Cir.
See United States v. Johnson Controls, Inc., 713 F.2d 1541, 1551 (Fed.Cir.1983). 5 "A party may not circumvent the Claims Court's exclusive jurisdiction by framing a complaint in the district court as one seeking injunctive, declaratory or mandatory relief where the thrust of the suit is to obtain money from the United States." Rogers v. Ink, 766 F.2d 430, 434 (10th Cir.1985); accord Colorado Dep't of Highways v. United States Dep't of Transp., 840 F.2d 753 , 755 (10th Cir.1…
Rule Authority · 10th Cir.
“A party may not circumvent the Claims Court’s exclusive jurisdiction by framing a complaint in the district court as one seeking injunctive, declaratory or mandatory relief where the thrust of the suit is to obtain money from the United States.” Rogers v. Ink, 766 F.2d 430, 434 (10th Cir.1985); accord Colorado Dep’t of Highways v. United States Dep’t of Transp., 840 F.2d 753 , 755 (10th Cir.1988); United States v. City of Kansas City, Kansas, 761 F.2d 605, 608-09 (10th Cir.…
Rule Authority · D.S.D.
Alamo Navajo School Bd., Inc, v. Andrus, 664 F.2d 229, 233 (10th Cir.1981); Sherar v. Harless, 561 F.2d 791, 793-94 (9th Cir.1977); Hoopa Valley Tribe v. United States, 219 Ct.Cl. 492 , 596 F.2d 435, 436 (1979).
green Adamson v. Radosevic (1988)
Rule Authority · D. Kan. · 2 citations in this opinion
United States v. City of Kansas City, Kansas, 761 F.2d 605, 607-08 (10th Cir.1985); Alamo Navajo School Bd., Inc. v. Andrus, 664 F.2d 229, 233 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 963 , 102 S.Ct. 2041 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982).
Rule Authority · D.P.R.
Portsmouth Redevelopment & Housing Auth. v. Pierce, 706 F.2d 471 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 960 , 104 S.Ct. 392 , 78 L.Ed.2d 336 (1983); Alamo Navajo School Board, Inc. v. Andrus, 664 F.2d 229, 233 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 963 , 102 S.Ct. 2041 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982).
green Gibson v. Block (1985)
Rule Authority · N.D. Ind.
State of New Mexico, 745 F.2d at 1322 ; Alamo Navajo School Bd., Inc. v. Andrus, 664 F.2d 229, 233 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 963 , 102 S.Ct. 2041 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982).
green Rogers v. Ink (1985)
Rule Authority · 10th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
See, e.g., United States v. City of Kansas City, 761 F.2d at 608 ; New Mexico v. Regan, 745 F.2d at 1322 ; Amalgamated Sugar Co. v. Bergland, 664 F.2d 818, 824 (10th Cir.1981); Alamo Navajo School Board, Inc. v. Andrus, 664 F.2d at 233. 10 Although plaintiffs’ first prayer seeks declaratory relief, the underlying purpose of the action was to obtain from the United States funds that SEK-CAP allegedly was due for the final eight months of its program year.
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
Examples of this are Ove Gustavsson Contracting Co. v. Floette, 278 F.2d 912, 914 (2 Cir.) (suit-seeking declaratory and injunctive relief after termination of contract), cert, denied, 364 U.S. 894 , 81 S.Ct. 225 , 5 L.Ed.2d 188 (1960); Alabama Rural Fire Insurance Co. v. Naylor, 530 F.2d 1221, 1229-30 (5 Cir.1976) (suit stemming from rescission of contract); American Science & Engineering, Inc. v. Calif ano, 571 F.2d 58, 61-62 (1 Cir.1978) (suit seeking to enjoin terminatio…
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
Examples of this are Ove Gustavsson Contracting Co. v. Floete, 278 F.2d 912, 914 (2 Cir.) (suit seeking declaratory and injunctive relief after termination of contract), cert. denied, 364 U.S. 894 , 81 S.Ct. 225 , 5 L.Ed.2d 188 (1960); Alabama Rural Fire Insurance Co. v. Naylor, 530 F.2d 1221, 1229-30 (5 Cir.1976) (suit stemming from rescission of contract); American Science & Engineering, Inc. v. Califano, 571 F.2d 58, 61-62 (1 Cir.1978) (suit seeking to enjoin termination …
Cited · D.N.M. · signal: see
See Alamo Navajo School Bd. v. Andrus, 664 F.2d 229, 233 (10th Cir.1981) (stating, "[m]andamus does not supersede other remedies, but rather comes into play where there is a want of such remedies.”) (citation omitted). 10 .
Cited · Ct. Cl. · signal: see
See, Alamo Navajo School Board, Inc. v. Andrus, 664 F.2d 229 (10th Cir.1981).
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see
See Alamo Navajo School Board, Inc. v. Andrus 664 F.2d 229, 233 (10th Cir.1981) cert, denied, 456 U.S. 963 , 102 S.Ct. 2041 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982); B.K Instrument, Inc. v. United States, supra, 715 F.2d at 727 ; Bakersfield City Sch.
green Allen v. United States (1984)
Cited · D. Kan. · signal: see
See Alamo Navajo School Board, Inc. v. Andrus, 664 F.2d 229, 233 (10th Cir.1981).
Cited (see also) · 10th Cir. · signal: see also
Plaintiffs are therefore seeking recovery of at least $228,444. 9 17 Several courts have noted that "when the 'prime objective' or 'essential purpose' of the complaining party is to obtain money from the federal government (in an amount in excess of $10,000), the Claims Court's exclusive jurisdiction is triggered." New Mexico v. Regan, 745 F.2d 1318, 1322 (10th Cir.1984), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 105 S.Ct. 2138 , 85 L.Ed.2d 496 (1985); see also Alamo Navajo School Board,…
Cited (see also) · 10th Cir. · signal: see also
The City’s shift in requested remedies is unavailing, however, because even if characterized as a request for injunctive or declaratory relief, the City’s claim runs afoul of the Tucker Act under this court’s decision in Amalgamated Sugar Co. v. Bergland, 664 F.2d 818, 823-24 (10th Cir. 1981); see also Alamo Navajo School Bd. v. Andrus, 664 F.2d 229, 233 (10th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 963 , 102 S.Ct. 2041 , 72 L.Ed.2d 487 (1982).