Cluster 415303
green
· 87 citation events
across 35 courts.
Showing the 45 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green
Campos v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (2005)
As an initial matter, the court notes that the preferential payment provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 553 , covering set offs, rather than those of § 547, covering “transfers,” applies in this ease. 4 Lee v. Schweiker, 739 F.2d 870 , 873 n. 4 (3d Cir.1984) (“[Wjhere a setoff right is being asserted, section 553, rather than section 547, governs the creditor’s rights.”) (citing F.D.I.C. v. Bank of Am., 701 F.2d 831, 836 (9th Cir.1983)); see also In re Rehab Project, Inc., 238 B.R. 36…
“[I]t is abundantly clear that when § 553 is determined to be applicable, § 547 cannot thereafter be utilized to undo its effect.”
green
Shin Da Enterprises Inc. v. XIANG YONG (2025)
Ass’n, 701 F.2d 831, 836 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 935 (1983)).
green
Ahmad v. United States (In re Ahmad) (2015)
Our reading of this language is that, where a setoff right is being asserted, section 553, rather than section 547, governs the creditor’s rights.” Lee v. Schweiker, 739 F.2d 870 , 873 n. 4 (3d Cir.1984) (citing F.D.I.C. v. Bank of America, 701 F.2d 831, 836 (9th Cir.1983)).
Ass’n, 701 F.2d 831, 836-37 (9th Cir.1983) (holding that a creditor was not entitled to set off against the FDIC when its claim was subordinated to the rights of depositors under the statutory priority scheme); FDIC v. RPM Mortgage, 2010 WL 9502044 (C.D.Cal.
green
Szymanski v. Wachovia Bank, N.A. (In Re Szymanski) (2009)
Ass’n, 701 F.2d 831, 836 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 935 , 104 S.Ct. 343 , 78 L.Ed.2d 310 (1983).
green
United States v. Gould (In Re Gould) (2009)
Ass’n, 701 F.2d 831, 836-37 (9th Cir.1983) (denying the bank’s claim of set-off against the debtors’ bank deposits on public policy grounds).
green
In Re Gould (2008)
FDIC v. Bank of America Nat’l Trust and Savings, 701 F.2d 831, 836-37 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 935 , 104 S.Ct. 343 , 78 L.Ed.2d 310 (1983). 3.
green
In Re Gould (2008)
FDIC v. Bank of America Nat'l Trust and Savings, 701 F.2d 831, 836-37 (9th Cir.1983), cert, denied, 464 U.S. 935 , 104 S.Ct. 343 , 78 L.Ed.2d 310 (1983). 3.
green
Lambert v. Callahan (In Re Lambert Oil Co.) (2006)
Assn., 701 F.2d 831, 836-39 (9th Cir.1983); FDIC v. De Jesus Velez, 678 F.2d 371, 376 (1st Cir.1982); Marta Group, Inc. v. County Appliance Co., 79 B.R. 200, 204 (E.DJPa.1987).
green
In Re Nuclear Imaging Systems, Inc. (2000)
Ass’n, 701 F.2d 831, 836 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 935 , 104 S.Ct. 343 , 78 L.Ed.2d 310 (1983).
Lee v. Schweiker, 739 F.2d 870, 873 (3rd Cir.1984) (citing F.D.I.C. v. Bank of America, 701 F.2d 831, 836 (9th Cir.1983)).
green
In Re ICH Corp. (1998)
Corp. v. Bank of America, 701 F.2d 831, 836 (9th Cir.1983).
green
Brown v. Sayyah (1998)
Corp. v. Bank of America, 701 F.2d 831, 836 (9th Cir.1983).
green
In Re: Hal, Inc. Hawaiian Airlines Inc. West Maui Airport, Inc. Debtors. Hal, Inc. Hawaiian Airlines Inc. Wes… (1997)
We have held that “[sjetoff will not be permitted when it would be inequitable or contrary to public policy to do so.” FDIC v. Bank of America Nat’l Trust and Savings, 701 F.2d 831, 836 (9th Cir.1983).
Corp. v. Bank of America Nat’l Trust and Savings Ass’n, 701 F.2d 831, 836-37 (9th Cir.1983), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 935 , 104 S.Ct. 343 , 78 L.Ed.2d 310 (1983).
green
Villafañe Neris v. Citibank, N.A. (1994)
Corp. v. Bank of America, 701 F.2d 831, 836 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 935 , 104 S.Ct. 343 , 78 L.Ed.2d 310 (1983); see also Northern Trust, 619 F.Supp. at 1342 .
green
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Rusconi (1992)
See, e.g., D’Oench, Duhme & Co. v. FDIC, 315 U.S. 447, 474 , 62 S.Ct. 676, 687 , 86 L.Ed. 956 (1942) (Jackson, J., concurring) ("[M]any questions as to the liability of parties to commercial paper which comes into the hands of the [FDIC] will best be solved by applying the local law with reference to which the [parties] presumably contracted.”); FDIC v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association, 701 F.2d 831, 834 (9th Cir.) (”[P]arties may agree as to the law to b…
green
Federal Deposit Insurance v. Rusconi (1992)
See, e.g., D’Oench, Duhme & Co. v. FDIC, 315 U.S. 447, 474 , 62 S.Ct. 676, 687 , 86 L.Ed. 956 (1942) (Jackson, J., concurring) ("[M]any questions as to the liability of parties to commercial paper which comes into the hands of the [FDIC] will best be solved by applying the local law with reference to which the [parties] presumably contracted.”); FDIC v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association, 701 F.2d 831, 834 (9th Cir.) ("[P]arties may agree as to the law to b…
Assoc., 701 F.2d 831, 834 (9th Cir.) (“Where, as here, the FDIC is proceeding in its corporate capacity, federal law applies.”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 935 , 104 S.Ct. 343 , 78 L.Ed.2d 310 (1983).
Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Bank of America National Trust, 701 F.2d 831, 836 (9th Cir.1983).
green
Bradford v. American Federal Bank, F.S.B. (1991)
Nat'l Trust & Savings Ass’n, 701 F.2d 831, 834 (9th Cir.1983); Renda, 692 F.Supp. at 134 . 24 .
Corp. v. Bank of America, 701 F.2d 831, 836-37 (9th Cir.) (“set-off will not be permitted when it would be inequitable or contrary to *183 public policy to do so”), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 935 , 104 S.Ct. 343 , 78 L.Ed.2d 310 (1983).
Corp. v. Bank of America Nat’l Trust and Savings Ass’n, 701 F.2d 831, 836 (9th Cir.1983); Big Bear Super Market No. 3 v. Princess Baking Corp. (In re Princess Baking Corp.), 5 B.R. 587, 589 (Bankr.S.D.Calif.1980); 4 L.
green
Official Unsecured Creditors' Committee ex rel. Estate of Hescon Developers, Inc. v. Capistrano National Bank… (1988)
FDIC v. Bank of America, 701 F.2d 831, 834 (9th Cir.1983).
green
In Re A.J. Nielson (1988)
While the court’s discretion is not unbounded, setoff should not be permitted when it would be “inequitable or against public policy to do so.” FDIC v. Bank or America, 701 F.2d 831, 836-37 (9th Cir.1983).
green
Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Renda (1988)
See D’Oench, Duhme & Co. v. F.D.I.C., 315 U.S. 447, 456 , 62 S.Ct. 676, 679 , 86 L.Ed. 956 (1942) (focusing on the FDIC); F.D.I.C. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass’n, 701 F.2d 831, 834 (9th Cir.1983) (focusing on the FDIC), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 935 , 104 S.Ct. 343 , 78 L.Ed.2d 310 (1984); F.S.L.I.C. v. Alexander, 590 F.Supp. 834 (D.Haw.1984) (focusing on the FSLIC).
green
Pieri v. Lysenko (In Re Pieri) (1988)
Corp. v. Bank of America, 701 F.2d 831, 836 (9th Cir.1983).
green
Official Unsecured Creditors' Committee Ex Rel. Estate of Hescon Developers, Inc. (In Re Hescon Developers, I… (1987)
FDIC v. Bank of America, 701 F.2d 831, 834 (9th Cir.1983).
green
Interfirst Bank Abilene, N.A., Cross-Appellant v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of Ranch… (1985)
FDIC v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association, 701 F.2d 831, 836 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 935 , 104 S.Ct. 343 , 78 L.Ed.2d 310 (1983).
green
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Blue Rock Shopping Center, Inc., a Delaware Corporation. Appeal of M… (1985)
Cf. F.D.I.C. v. Bank of America, 701 F.2d 831, 834 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 343 , 78 L.Ed.2d 310 (1983) (applying state law). 6 .
green
Kira v. Holiday Mart, Inc. (1983)
FDIC v. Bank of America, 701 F.2d 831, 839 (9th Cir. 1983). .
green
In Re Holiday Mart, Inc., Debtor. Barbara Kira, Debenture Holders-Appellants v. Holiday Mart, Inc., Debtors-A… (1983)
FDIC v. Bank of America, 701 F.2d 831, 839 (9th Cir.1983) 5 The authors adopt inconsistent positions with respect to those who extended credit after the sale of subordinated securities and those whose actions occurred before the sale.
green
Koro Co., Inc. v. Bristol-Myers Co. (1983)
See Restatement (2d) of Conflict of Laws § 187 (1971); Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Bank of America, 701 F.2d 831, 834 (11th Cir.1983); cf. M/S Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co., 407 U.S. 1 , 92 S.Ct. 1907 , 32 L.Ed.2d 513 (1972).
green
Holyoke Nursing Home, Inc. v. Health Care Financing Administration (In Re Holyoke Nursing Home, Inc.) (2002)
See Lee v. Schweiker, 739 F.2d 870 , 873 n. 4 (3rd Cir.1984)(citing F.D.I.C. v. Bank of America, 701 F.2d 831, 836 (9th Cir.1983)); In re Wild Bills, Inc. at 13 (holding that the failure of § 553 to reference § 547 precludes an analysis of setoff under the latter provision).
green
Cain v. Mappa (In Re Pineview Care Center, Inc.) (1992)
See Lee v. Schweiker, 739 F.2d 870, 873 (3d Cir.1984), citing, F.D.I.C. v. Bank of America, 701 F.2d 831, 836 (9th Cir.1983).
See FDIC v. Bank of America Nat’l Trust and Savings Ass’n, 701 F.2d 831, 837-39 (9th Cir.) (bank holding subordinated note of an insolvent bank cannot set off deposits against the note because the note functioned as part of insolvent bank’s capital), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 935 , 104 S.Ct. 343 , 78 L.Ed.2d 310 (1983); Weis, 605 F.2d at 596 (2d Cir.1978) (purpose of regulatory capital rule would be undermined if subordination agreement which permitted loan proceeds to satisfy …
green
In Re Hinson (1986)
See cited there Lee v. Schweiker, 739 F.2d 870 , 973 at n. 4 (3rd Cir.1984), In re Cresta, 51 B.R. 127 (Bankr.Ct.E.D.Pa.1985), F.D.I.C. v. Bank of America, 701 F.2d 831, 836 (9th Cir.1983); Epstein, Debtor-Creditor Law (3rd ed. 1985), p. 201.
green
11 Collier bankr.cas.2d 834, Bankr. L. Rep. P 69,914, 6 soc.sec.rep.ser. 98, unempl.ins.rep. Cch 16,982 Lilli… (1984)
See F.D.I.C. v. Bank of America, 701 F.2d 831, 836 (9th Cir.1983). 5 In the "common law" era of pleading, a defendant could not assert a separate claim against a plaintiff in the same proceeding.
green
Lee v. Schweiker (1984)
See F.D.I.C. v. Bank of America, 701 F.2d 831, 836 (9th Cir.1983). .
green
In Re Cascade Roads, Inc., Debtor. United States of America v. Peter H. Arkison, Trustee (1994)
Setoff should not be allowed when it would be inequitable or contrary to public policy to do so.”) (citations omitted); Parkway Plaza Investors v. Bacigalupi (In re Bacigalupi Inc.), 60 B.R. 442, 445 (9th Cir. BAP 1986) (“The allowance or disallowance of a setoff is a decision which ultimately rests in the sound discretion of the bankruptcy court.”); See also FDIC v. Bank of America, 701 F.2d 831, 836-37 (9th Cir.) (“Setoff will not be permitted when it would be inequitable …
See also FDIC v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association, 701 F.2d 831 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 935 , 104 S.Ct. 343 , 78 L.Ed.2d 310 (1983) (barring holder of subordinated debenture from exercising right of set-off); Anderson v. Cronkleton, 32 F.2d 170, 172-73 (8th Cir.1929) (fraudulent inducement no defense to statutory liability of holder of bank stock, following Scott v. DeWeese).
green
Central National Bank of Waco, Texas v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for First Republic… (1990)
Nat’l Bank *1281 Eastern v. FDIC, 782 F.2d 633, 635 (6th Cir.1986); see also FDIC v. Bank of Am., 701 F.2d 831, 835-36 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 935 , 104 S.Ct. 343 , 78 L.Ed.2d 310 (1983); Adams v. Resolution Trust Corp., 731 F.Supp. 352, 355-57 (D.Minn.1990).
See also Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Bank of America, 701 F.2d 831 (9th Cir.1983), (bank has a right to set-off a debt it owes even though, to the extent of the set-off, the set-off can be said to prefer the offsetting bank to the creditors of the debtor).
See also Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Bank of America, 701 F.2d 831 (9th Cir.1983), (bank has a right to set-off a debt it owes even though, to the extent of the set-off, the set-off can be said to prefer the offsetting bank to the creditors of the debtor).
green
Heritage Land Co. v. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. (1983)
See, e.g., Federal Deposit Insur *1268 ance Corp. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Association, 701 F.2d 831, 834-35 (9th Cir.1983); Professional Asset Management Inc. v. Penn Square Bank, N.A., 566 F.Supp. 134 (W.D.Okl.1983) (order granting in part and denying in part the defendants’ motions to dismiss).