Cluster 423590

green · 73 citation events across 15 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 50

green Lor v. O'Malley (2024)

Rule Authority · D. Minnesota

Collins v. Astrue, 648 F.3d 869, 871 (8th Cir. 2011) (citing Brueggemann v. Barnhart, 348 F.3d 689, 692 (8th Cir. 2003); Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 836 (8th Cir. 1983)).

green Hayes v. Kijakazi (2023)

Rule Authority · D. Neb.

“Legal error may be an error of procedure, the use of erroneous legal standards, or an incorrect application of the law.” Id. (quoting Collins v. Astrue, 648 F.3d 869, 871 (8th Cir. 2011)) (citing Brueggemann v. Barnhart, 348 F.3d 689, 692 (8th Cir. 2003) and Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 836 (8th Cir. 1983)).

green Hunt-Kitchen v. Kijakazi (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Neb.

green Kness v. Kijakazi (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Neb.

“Legal error may be an error of procedure, the use of erroneous legal standards, or an incorrect application of the law.” Id. (internal citations omitted) (citing Brueggemann v. Barnhart, 348 F.3d 689, 692 (8th Cir. 2003) and Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 836 (8th Cir. 1983)).

green Griffin v. Kijakazi (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Neb.

Legal error may be an error of procedure, the use of erroneous legal standards, or an incorrect application of the law.” Id. (citing Brueggemann v. Barnhart, 348 F.3d 689, 692 (8th Cir. 2003); Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 836 (8th Cir. 1983)).

green Podany v. Kijakazi (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Neb.

“Legal error may be an error of procedure, the use of erroneous legal standards, or an incorrect application of the law.” Id. (internal citations omitted) (citing Brueggemann v. Barnhart, 348 F.3d 689, 692 (8th Cir. 2003); Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 836 (8th Cir. 1983)).

green Davis v. Kijakazi (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Neb.

green Riss v. Kijakazi (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Neb.

“Legal error may be an error of procedure, the use of erroneous legal standards, or an incorrect application of the law.” Id. (citing Brueggemann v. Barnhart, 348 F.3d 689, 692 (8th Cir. 2003); Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 836 (8th Cir. 1983)).

green Lyons v. Kijakazi (2021)

Rule Authority · D. Neb.

green Tyndall v. Kijakazi (2021)

Rule Authority · D. Neb.

green Hammond v. Commissioner of Social Security (2021)

Rule Authority · D. Neb.

“Legal error may be an error of procedure, the use of erroneous legal standards, or an incorrect application of the law.” Id. (internal citations omitted) (citing Brueggemann v. Barnhart, 348 F.3d 689, 692 (8th Cir. 2003); Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 836 (8th Cir. 1983)).

green King v. Kijakazi (2020)

Rule Authority · D. Neb.

green Ludden v. Kijakazi (2020)

Rule Authority · D. Neb.

“Legal error may be an error of procedure, the use of erroneous legal standards, or an incorrect application of the law.” Id. (internal citations omitted) (citing Brueggemann v. Barnhart, 348 F.3d 689, 692 (8th Cir. 2003); Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 836 (8th Cir. 1983)).

green Williams-Ferguson v. Kijakazi (2020)

Rule Authority · D. Neb.

green Goeken v. Kijakazi (2020)

Rule Authority · D. Neb.

green Keck v. Berryhill (2020)

Rule Authority · D. Neb.

green Vazquez v. Saul (2019)

Rule Authority · D. Neb.

“Legal error may be an error of procedure, the use of erroneous legal standards, or an incorrect application of the law.” Id. (internal citations omitted) (citing Brueggemann v. Barnhart, 348 F.3d 689, 692 (8th Cir. 2003); Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 836 (8th Cir. 1983)).

green Novotny v. Saul (2019)

Rule Authority · D. Neb.

“Legal error may be an error of procedure, the use of erroneous legal standards, or an incorrect application of the law.” Id. (internal citations omitted) (citing Brueggemann v. Barnhart, 348 F.3d 689, 692 (8th Cir. 2003); Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 836 (8th Cir. 1983)).

green KKC v. Carolyn W. Colvin (2016)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion

But in addition to our substantial evidence analysis, we have a "duty to review the disability benefit decision to determine if it is based on legal enor (i.e., erroneous legal standards, incorrect application of the law).” Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 835-36 (8th Cir.1983) (emphasis added); see also Pettit v. Apfel, 218 F.3d 901, 902 (8th Cir.2000) ("When considering whether the ALJ properly denied social security benefits to a claimant, we determine ... whether the …

green Collins v. Astrue (2011)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir.

Legal error may be an error of procedure, Brueggemann v. Barnhart, 348 F.3d 689, 692 (8th Cir.2003), the use of erroneous legal standards, or an incorrect application of the law, Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 836 (8th Cir.1983).

green Rowland v. Astrue (2009)

Rule Authority · D.S.D.

Smith v. Sullivan, 982 F.2d 308, 311 (8th Cir. 1992); Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 836 (8th Cir.1983).

green MUCKLER v. Astrue (2009)

Rule Authority · D.S.D.

Smith v. Sullivan, 982 F.2d 308, 311 (8th Cir.1992); Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 836 (8th Cir.1983).

green UDAGER v. Astrue (2009)

Rule Authority · D.S.D.

Smith v. Sullivan, 982 F.2d 308, 311 (8th Cir.1992); Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 836 (8th Cir.1983).

green Sanchez-Wentz v. Barnhart (2002)

Rule Authority · D. Neb. · 2 citations in this opinion

Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 836 (8th Cir.1983).

green Rohrberg v. Apfel (1998)

Rule Authority · D. Mass.

The court also noted that the claimant could “occasionally go fishing or engage in light activities,” but concluded that “ ‘sporadic or transitory activity does not disprove disability.’ ” Id. at 138 (quoting Smith v. Califano, 637 F.2d 968, 971-72 (3d Cir.1981)); see also Damron v. Secretary, 778 F.2d 279 (6th Cir.1985) (claimant could do minimal dusting and prepare meals); Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 837 (8th Cir.1983) (claimant could take short walks, watch televi…

green Strawhacker v. Apfel (1998)

Rule Authority · S.D. Iowa

Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 835 (8th Cir.1983).

green Cookemboo v. Apfel (1997)

Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.

See also Flanery v. Chater, 112 F.3d at 350 (8th Cir.1997); Thomas v. Sullivan, 876 F.2d 666, 669 (8th Cir.1989); Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 837 (8th Cir.1983).

green Davis v. Callahan (1997)

Rule Authority · S.D. Iowa · 2 citations in this opinion

In Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 836 (8th Cir.1983), the Court, quoting McCoy , wrote that after a claimant establishes that he or she is unable to do past relevant work, the Secretary, now the Commissioner, must prove, with medical evidence, that the claimant has the residual functional capacity for other work.

green Luebertha Ingram v. Shirley S. Chater (1997)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir.

Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 835-36 (8th Cir. 1983).

green Dorothy Jones v. Shirley S. Chater, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (1996)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir.

DISCUSSION A claimant for disability benefits bears the burden of proving that she is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity because of a medically determinable physical or mental impairment which is expected to last for at least twelve months or result in death. 42 U.S.C. § 1382c(a)(3)(A); Woolf v. Shalala, 3 F.3d 1210, 1212 (8th Cir.1993); Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 836 (8th Cir.1983).

green Dorothy Jones v. Shirley S. Chater (1996)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir.

DISCUSSION A claimant for disability benefits bears the burden of proving that she is unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity because of a medically determinable physical or mental impairment which is expected to last for at least twelve months or result in death. 42 U.S.C. § 1382c(a)(3)(A); Woolf v. Shalala, 3 F.3d 1210, 1212 (8th Cir. 1993); Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 836 (8th Cir. 1983).

green Mary A. KELLER, Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Appellee (1994)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion

Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 835 (8th Cir.1983).

green Price v. Sullivan (1992)

Rule Authority · E.D. Ark.

Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 837 (8th Cir.1983).

green LaBeaux v. Sullivan (1991)

Rule Authority · N.D. Iowa

Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 835-36 (8th Cir.1983).

green Bennie WISEMAN, Appellant, v. Louis W. SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Appellee (1990)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir.

See 42 U.S.C. § 423 (d)(1)(A) (1982); Nettles v. Schweifcer, 714 F.2d 833, 836 (8th Cir.1983).

green June L. CABRNOCH, SSN: 484-72-6803, Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Appe… (1989)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir.

Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 835 (8th Cir.1983); McMillian v. Schweiker, 697 F.2d 215, 220 (8th Cir.1983).

green Waters v. Bowen (1989)

Rule Authority · D. Mass. · 2 citations in this opinion

E.g., Damron v. Secretary, 778 F.2d 279 (6th Cir.1985) (claimant could do minimal dusting and prepare meals); Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 837 (8th Cir.1983) (claimant could take short walks, watch television and drive a car infrequently for short distances); McDonald v. Schweiker, 698 F.2d 361, 363 (8th Cir.1982) (claimant could start breakfast, start washing dishes, put laundry in the washing machine, and feed her children); Smith v. Califano, 637 F.2d 968, 971-72 (…

green Brassard v. Heckler (1985)

Rule Authority · D. Vt.

See e.g., Channel v. Heckler, 747 F.2d 577 (10th Cir.1984); Parsons v. Heckler, 739 F.2d 1334, 1339 (8th Cir.1984) (Secretary may not rely on medical-vocational guidelines where claimant suffers nonexertional impairment); Kail v. Heckler, 722 F.2d 1496, 1498 (9th Cir.1984) (grid rules cannot be applied where nonexertional condition impairs functional capacity for work because range of jobs available is narrower than grids would indicate); Haynes v. Heckler, 716 F.2d 483, 485…

green Carol Holland v. Margaret Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services of the United States (1985)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir.

Ledoux v. Schweiker, 732 F.2d 1385, 1387 (8th Cir.1984); Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 835 (8th Cir.1983); 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g).

green Franklin v. Heckler (1984)

Rule Authority · D.N.J.

Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 836 (8th Cir.1983); Dellolio v. Heckler, 705 F.2d 123, 125 (5th Cir.1983); Doran v. Schweiker, 681 F.2d 605, 609 (9th Cir.1982); Wiggins v. Schweiker, 679 F.2d 1387, 1389 (11th Cir.1982); Aubeuf v. Schweiker, 649 F.2d 107, 112 (2d Cir.1981). 1 The legal findings of the AU are not entitled to the deference given findings of fact.

green Robert J. HUNT, Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health & Human Services of the United States,… (1984)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir.

See, e.g., Baugus v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 717 F.2d 443, 445-46 (8th Cir.1983); Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 835-36 (8th Cir. 1983); O’Leary v. Schweiker, 710 F.2d 1334, 1337 (8th Cir.1983).

green James MILLER, Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Appellee (1984)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir.

See Ledoux v. Schweiker, 782 F.2d 1385, 1387 (8th Cir.1984); Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 835 (8th Cir.1983); 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g) (1982).

green Channel v. Heckler (1984)

Rule Authority · 10th Cir.

Id.; see also, e.g., Kail v. Heckler, 722 F.2d 1496, 1597-98 (9th Cir.1984) (AU’s reliance on grids was error where claimant could not tolerate dust, fumes, or heat); Haynes v. Heckler, 716 F.2d 483, 485 (8th Cir.1983) (AU’s reliance on grids was error where claimant’s limitations, colon discomfort and recurrent diarrhea, were nonexertional); McClain v. Schweiker, 715 F.2d 866 , 869 n. 1 (4th Cir.1983) (because claimant demonstrated existence of nonexertional impairment, a n…

green Channel v. Heckler (1984)

Rule Authority · 10th Cir.

Id.; see also, e.g., Kail v. Heckler, 722 F.2d 1496, 1597-98 (9th Cir.1984) (ALJ's reliance on grids was error where claimant could not tolerate dust, fumes, or heat); Haynes v. Heckler, 716 F.2d 483, 485 (8th Cir.1983) (ALJ's reliance on grids was error where claimant's limitations, colon discomfort and recurrent diarrhea, were nonexertional); McClain v. Schweiker, 715 F.2d 866 , 869 n. 1 (4th Cir.1983) (because claimant demonstrated existence of nonexertional impairment, a…

green Michael Edwin SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Def… (1984)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir.

V 1981); Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 835 (8th Cir.1983).

green Winston v. Heckler (1984)

Rule Authority · D.N.J.

Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 836 (8th Cir.1983); Dellolio v. Heckler, 705 F.2d 123, 125 (5th Cir. 1983); Doran v. Schweiker, 681 F.2d 605, 609 (9th Cir.1982); Wiggins v. Schweiker, 679 F.2d 1387, 1389 (11th Cir.1982); Aubeuf v. Schweiker, 649 F.2d 107, 112 (2d Cir. 1981). 2a The legal findings of the AU are not entitled to the deference given findings of fact.

green Andrew BASINGER, Appellant, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services, Appel… (1984)

Rule Authority · 8th Cir. · signal: cf. · 2 citations in this opinion

Cf. Nettles v. Schweiker, supra, 714 F.2d at 837 (subjective testimony of pain); Simonson v. Schweiker, 699 F.2d 426, 429 (8th Cir.1983) (subjective testimony of pain).

subjective testimony of pain

green Arnold v. Rhode Island Dept. of Human Serv. (2008)

Cited · Sup. Ct. R.I. · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion

See Nettles , 714 F.2d at 836 (demonstrating inapplicability of grid where claimant's pain considered nonexertional impairment).

demonstrating inapplicability of grid where claimant's pain considered nonexertional impairment

green Lyublinsky v. Barnhart (2005)

Cited · E.D.N.Y · signal: see

See Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 836 (8th Cir.1983) (stating that it is the district court’s duty to review SSD benefit decisions to determine if they are based on legal error).

green Berry v. Sullivan (1991)

Cited · E.D. Ark. · signal: see

See Nettles v. Schweiker, 714 F.2d 833, 837 (8th Cir.1983); Simonson v. Schweiker, 699 F.2d 426, 429 (8th Cir.1983).