Cluster 4237388
green
· 26 citation events
across 1 courts.
Showing the 7 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green
In re J.L.S. (2026)
These two circumstances are each individually capable of satisfying the second prong of the permanent custody analysis. {¶ 43} Upon review, we conclude the juvenile court's determination that (1) it was in John's best interest to award permanent custody to the Agency; and (2) at least one of the required Legal Circumstances was satisfied was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. - 15 - Butler CA2025-11-124 Mother's Policy Based Arguments {¶ 44} Despite the foregoi…
green
State v. Thompson (2025)
Under these circumstances, we need not address it.” State v. Body, 2021-Ohio-703 , ¶ 23 (8th Dist.), citing State v. Gavin, 2015-Ohio-2996, ¶ 25 (4th Dist.), citing State v. Quarterman, 2014-Ohio- 4034, ¶ 17-20 (an appellate court need not consider plain error where appellant fails to timely raise plain-error claim); In re A.R., 2016-Ohio-4919, ¶ 33 (12th Dist.) (appellant is precluded from raising plain error on appeal where he does not argue it in his brief). {¶85} Even if…
green
Gilmore v. Guess (2023)
Butler No. CA2015-08-143, 2016-Ohio-4919, ¶ 33 (appellant is precluded from raising plain error on appeal where he does not argue it in his brief); Wright v. Dir.
green
In re R.B. (2022)
Butler No. CA2015-08- 143, 2016-Ohio-4919, ¶ 18 ("the case plan is simply a means to a goal, but not the goal itself"); In re G.C., 12th Dist.
green
Kobal v. Edward Jones Secs. (2021)
Butler No. CA2015-08-143, 2016-Ohio-4919, ¶ 33 (appellant is precluded from raising plain error on appeal where he does not argue it in his brief).
green
Nationstar Mtge., L.L.C. v. Jessie (2021)
Butler No. CA2015-08-143, 2016-Ohio-4919, ¶ 33 (appellant is precluded from raising plain error on appeal where he does not argue it in his brief); Coleman v. Coleman, 9th Dist.
Butler No. CA2015-08-143, 2016-Ohio-4919, ¶ 33 (appellant is precluded from raising plain error on appeal where he does not argue it in his brief); Coleman v. Coleman, 9th Dist.