How cited: Cluster 4237388 · Go Syfert

Cluster 4237388

green · 26 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 7 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green In re J.L.S. (2026)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
These two circumstances are each individually capable of satisfying the second prong of the permanent custody analysis. {¶ 43} Upon review, we conclude the juvenile court's determination that (1) it was in John's best interest to award permanent custody to the Agency; and (2) at least one of the required Legal Circumstances was satisfied was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. - 15 - Butler CA2025-11-124 Mother's Policy Based Arguments {¶ 44} Despite the foregoi…
green State v. Thompson (2025)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
Under these circumstances, we need not address it.” State v. Body, 2021-Ohio-703 , ¶ 23 (8th Dist.), citing State v. Gavin, 2015-Ohio-2996, ¶ 25 (4th Dist.), citing State v. Quarterman, 2014-Ohio- 4034, ¶ 17-20 (an appellate court need not consider plain error where appellant fails to timely raise plain-error claim); In re A.R., 2016-Ohio-4919, ¶ 33 (12th Dist.) (appellant is precluded from raising plain error on appeal where he does not argue it in his brief). {¶85} Even if…
green Gilmore v. Guess (2023)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
Butler No. CA2015-08-143, 2016-Ohio-4919, ¶ 33 (appellant is precluded from raising plain error on appeal where he does not argue it in his brief); Wright v. Dir.
green In re R.B. (2022)
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
Butler No. CA2015-08- 143, 2016-Ohio-4919, ¶ 18 ("the case plan is simply a means to a goal, but not the goal itself"); In re G.C., 12th Dist.
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
Butler No. CA2015-08-143, 2016-Ohio-4919, ¶ 33 (appellant is precluded from raising plain error on appeal where he does not argue it in his brief).
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
Butler No. CA2015-08-143, 2016-Ohio-4919, ¶ 33 (appellant is precluded from raising plain error on appeal where he does not argue it in his brief); Coleman v. Coleman, 9th Dist.
Rule Authority · Ohio Ct. App.
Butler No. CA2015-08-143, 2016-Ohio-4919, ¶ 33 (appellant is precluded from raising plain error on appeal where he does not argue it in his brief); Coleman v. Coleman, 9th Dist.