Cluster 437461

See League of Women Voters v. Nassau County Board of Supervisors, 737 F.2d 155, 160-61 (2d Cir. 1984) (“This Circuit has restricted organizational standing under § 1983 by interpreting the rights it secures to be personal to those purportedly injured....

Bd. of Supervisors, 737 F.2d 155 , 160 (2d Cir. 1984) (“Neither [the] language nor the history [of § 1983] suggests that an organization may sue under the Civil Rights Act for the violations of rights of members.”).4 Plaintiffs appear to argue that the NYCC can nevertheless “independently satisfy” the requirements of Article III “and bring suit by itself.” Moya v. United States Dep’t of Homeland Sec., 975 F.3d 120, 128 (2d Cir. 2020).

Bd. of Supervisors, 737 F.2d 155 , 161 (2d Cir. 1984) (“[A]s voters from overrepresented municipalities, these plaintiffs cannot claim any injury.”); Roxbury Taxpayers All. v. Delaware Cnty.

League of Women Voters of Nassau County v. Nassau County Board of Supervisors, 737 F.2d 155, 160 (2d Cir. 1984). �erefore, for an organization to have standing it must independently satisfy the requirements of Article III standing.

See, e.g., Wright, 358 F.3d at 1355; League of Women Voters, 737 F.2d at 161-62.

Id. at 156.

League of Women Voters of Nassau County v. Nassau County Board of Supervisors, 737 F.2d 155, 161 (2nd Cir.1984); Minority Police Officers Association of South Bend v. City of South Bend, Ind., 721 F.2d 197, 202 (7th Cir.1983).

League of Women Voters of Nassau County v. Nassau County Board of Supervisors, 737 F.2d 155, 161 (2nd Cir.1984); Minority Police Officers Association of South Bend v. City of South Bend, Ind., 721 F.2d 197, 202 (7th Cir.1983).

To calculate the *823 extent of such deviation in this context, the district court in Roxbwry utilized a method of calculation (previously endorsed by the Court of Appeals in another “weighted voting” case, League of Women Voters v. Nassau County Board of Supervisors, 737 F.2d 155, 171 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1108 , 105 S.Ct. 783 , 83 L.Ed.2d 778 (1985)), in which the percentage of the county’s total population represented by a given member of the county legisl…

In League of Women Voters v. Nassau County Bd. of Supervisors, the Second Circuit adopted the position of the Fifth Circuit in Fairley v. Patterson, 493 F.2d 598 (5th Cir.1974), and held that plaintiffs who could not show injury by demonstrating that they were domiciled in an underrepresented voting district, “lacked standing to contest a reapportionment law.” League of Women Voters, 737 F.2d at 161.

With regard to the remaining plaintiffs' challenge to Nassau County's weighted voting system as a whole, the Second Circuit agreed with the defendants that the Supreme Court's summary adjudication in Franklin v. Krause, 32 N.Y.2d 234 , 344 N.Y.S.2d 885 , 298 N.E.2d 68 (1973), appeal dismissed, 415 U.S. 904 , 94 S.Ct. 1397 , 39 L.Ed.2d 461 , upholding the weighted voting system as a whole, was dispositive of the constitutionality issue regarding Local Law 2-1982 ( League of W…

With regard to the remaining plaintiffs’ challenge to Nassau County’s weighted voting system as a whole, the Second Circuit agreed with the defendants that the Supreme Court’s summary adjudication in Franklin v. Krause, 32 N.Y.2d 234 , 344 N.Y.S.2d 885 , 298 N.E.2d 68 (1973), appeal dismissed, 415 U.S. 904 , 94 S.Ct. 1397 , 39 L.Ed.2d 461 , upholding the weighted voting system as a whole, was dispositive of the constitutionality issue regarding Local Law 2-1982 (League of Wo…

Hicks, supra, 422 U.S. at 344 , 95 S.Ct. 2289 ; see Soto-Lopez v. New York City Civil Service Commission, 755 F.2d 266, 272 (2d Cir.1985) (the summary affirmance “constitutes binding precedent for the present ease unless ... overruled, explicitly or implicitly, by a subsequent Supreme Court decision”); League of Women Voters v. Nassau County Board of Supervisors, 737 F.2d 155, 172 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1108 , 105 S.Ct. 783 , 83 L.Ed.2d 778 (1985) (“The Suprem…

League of Women Voters of Nassau County v. Nassau County Board of Supervisors, 737 F.2d 155, 169 (2d Cir.1984).

See 737 F.2d 155 , 161 (2d Cir. 1984).

See League of Women Voters of Nassau County v. Nassau Board of Supervisors , 737 F.2d 155 , 160 (2d Cir. 1984) ; Aguayo v. Richardson , 473 F.2d 1090 , 1099 (2d Cir. 1973) ; but see Centro de la Comunidad Hispana de Locust Valley v. Town of Oyster Bay , 868 F.3d 104 , 122-124 (2d Cir. 2017) (Jacobs, J., dissenting) (questioning that analysis).

See League of Women Voters of Nassau County v. Nassau County Bd. of Supervisors, 737 F.2d 155 , 160 (2d Cir.1984) (“This Circuit has restricted organizational standing under § 1983 by interpreting the rights it secures to be personal to those purportedly injured.”); Aguayo v. Richardson, 473 F.2d 1090, 1099 (2d Cir.1973) (“Neither [the statutory] language nor the history ... suggests that an organization may sue under the Civil Rights Act for the violation of rights of membe…

See League of Women Voters of Nassau County v. Nassau County Bd. Of Supervisors, 737 F.2d 155 , 160 (2d Cir.1984).

See League of Women Voters of Nassau County v. Nassau County Bd. of Supervisors, 737 F.2d 155 , 160 (2d Cir.1984) (League did not have standing to assert the rights of its members).

Accord, League of Women Voters v. Nassau County Board of Supervisors, 737 F.2d 155, 161-62 (2d Cir.1984); Fairley v. Patterson, 493 F.2d 598, 603-04 (5th Cir.1974).

See, e.g., League of Women Voters, 737 F.2d at 161 .

See also League of Women Voters v. Nassau County Board of Supervisors, 737 F.2d 155 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1108 , 105 S.Ct. 783 , 83 L.Ed.2d 778 (1985).

See also League of Women Voters v. Nassau County Board of Supervisors, 737 F.2d 155 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1108 , 105 S.Ct. 783 , 83 L.Ed.2d 778 (1985).