Cluster 4418351

green · 29 citation events across 4 courts. Showing the 23 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 23

green HEWLETT v. CANNON MILLS COMPANY (2022)

Quote Authority · D.N.J.

Auth., 701 F. App'x 113, 116 (3d Cir. 2017) (“[T]here has to be enough in the complaint to suggest that discovery will reveal evidence of every necessary element of the claim.”).

“[T]here has to be enough in the complaint to suggest that discovery will reveal evidence of every necessary element of the claim.”

green Kirti Solanki v. Ashland, LLC (2026)

Rule Authority · D.N.J.

Auth., 701 F. App’x 113, 116 (3d Cir. 2017).

green PASKAS v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. (2024)

Rule Authority · D.N.J.

Auth., 701 F. App’x 113, 116 (3d Cir. 2017)).

green SCHNARS v. WALDEMEER PARK, INC. (2024)

Rule Authority · W.D. Pa.

In the context of this case, Plaintiff must produce “facts from which it could be inferred that the unfavorable performance review adversely affected the terms or conditions of her employment.” Clark v. Philadelphia Housing Auth., 701 Fed.

green SHARKOSKI v. VISITING NURSE ASSOCIATION OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA (2024)

Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.

Auth., 701 F. App’x 113, 117 (3d Cir. 2017) (quoting Burlington Indus.

quoting Burlington Indus. Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742, 761 (1998)

green AYALA, SR. v. LOCAL 6 BAKERY CONFECTIONERY AND TOBACCO WORKERS INTERNATIONAL (2024)

Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.

Auth., 701 F. App’x 113, 117 (3d Cir. 2017).

green ROBINSON v. SEPTA (2024)

Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.

Auth., 701 F. App’x 113, 117 (3d Cir. 2017).

green PASKAS v. UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. (2023)

Rule Authority · D.N.J. · 2 citations in this opinion

Auth., 701 F. App’x 113, 116 (3d Cir. 2017)).

green OKPARAEKE v. DUKE-JACKSON (2023)

Rule Authority · D.N.J.

Auth., 701 F. App’x 113, 117 (3d Cir. 2017) (citations omitted) (explaining that for an unfavorable performance review to constitute an adverse employment action sufficient to support a retaliation claim, the plaintiff “must allege facts from which it could be inferred that the unfavorable performance review adversely affected the terms or conditions of her employment.”).

citations omitted

green MCGARRIGLE v. Cristo Rey Philadelphia High School (2023)

Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.

Housing Auth., 701 F. App’x 113, 116 (3d Cir. 2017) (quoting Budhun v. Reading Hosp. and Med.

quoting Budhun v. Reading Hosp. and Med. Ctr., 765 F.3d 245, 258 (3d Cir. 2014)

green DIORIO v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA (2022)

Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.

Auth., 701 F. App’x 113, 116 (3d Cir. 2017) (citing Lichtenstein v. Univ. of Pittsburgh Med.

citing Lichtenstein v. Univ. of Pittsburgh Med. Ctr., 691 F.3d 294, 301-02 (3d Cir. 2012)

green Raymo v. Civitas Media LLC (2021)

Rule Authority · M.D. Penn.

Auth., 701 F. App'x 113, 117 (3d Cir. 2017) (quoting Burlington Indus.

quoting Burlington Indus. Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742, 749 (1998)

green ERRINGTON v. CITY OF READING (2021)

Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.

Housing Auth., 701 F. App’x 113, 117 (3d Cir. 2017) (quoting Burlington Indus.

quoting Burlington Indus. Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742, 749 (1998)

green Mastrella v. DeJoy (2021)

Rule Authority · M.D. Penn.

Auth., 701 F. App’x 113, 116 (3d Cir. 2017) (nonprecedential) (same for FMLA retaliation claim with four-year delay).

nonprecedential

green DAJTI v. PENN COMMUNITY BANK (2021)

Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.

Auth., 701 F. App’x 113, 116 (3d Cir. 2017) (citing Lichtenstein v. Univ. of Pittsburgh Med.

citing Lichtenstein v. Univ. of Pittsburgh Med. Ctr., 691 F.3d 294, 301-02 (3d Cir. 2012)

green Pierre v. WOODS SERVICES (2021)

Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.

Auth., 701 F. App’x 113, 116 (3d Cir. 2017) (quoting Budhun v. Reading Hosp. and Medical Ctr., 765 F.3d 245, 258 (3d Cir. 2014)). 26 Dudhi v. Temple Health Oaks Lung Ctr., No. 18-3514, 2019 WL 426145 , at *8 (E.D.

quoting Budhun v. Reading Hosp. and Medical Ctr., 765 F.3d 245, 258 (3d Cir. 2014)

green FRIEL v. MNUCHIN (2020)

Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.

Auth., 701 F. App’x 113, 117 (3d Cir. 2017) (finding no adverse action for purposes of retaliation where plaintiff did not show her negative performance review adversely affected the terms or conditions of her employment); Barnett v. N.J.

finding no adverse action for purposes of retaliation where plaintiff did not show her negative performance review adversely affected the terms or conditions of her employment

green MARTONE v. JET AVIATION FLIGHT SERVICES, INC. (2020)

Rule Authority · D.N.J.

Auth., 701 F. App’x 113, 116 (3d Cir. 2017) (quoting Budhun v. Reading Hosp. and Med.

quoting Budhun v. Reading Hosp. and Med. Ctr., 765 F.3d 245, 258 (3d Cir. 2014)

green BRESLOW v. STATE STREET CORP. (2020)

Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.

Auth., 701 F. App’x 113, 117 (3d Cir. 2017) (quoting Ross v. Gilhuly, 755 F.3d 185 , 191–92 (3d Cir. 2014) (citations omitted).

quoting Ross v. Gilhuly, 755 F.3d 185 , 191–92 (3d Cir. 2014) (citations omitted). To state an FMLA retaliation claim, a plaintiff must allege: (1) she took or sought FMLA leave; (2) she suffered an adverse employment decision; and (3

green O'Malley v. Dowd Marketing, Inc. (2020)

Rule Authority · M.D. Penn.

In the context of this case, Clark must allege facts from which it could be inferred that the unfavorable performance review adversely affected the terms or conditions of her employment. 701 F.App’x. 113, 117 (3d Cir. 2017).

green Baker v. Benton Area School District (2019)

Rule Authority · M.D. Penn. · 2 citations in this opinion

Auth., 701 F. App’x 113, 117 (3d Cir. 2017); see Suppan v. Dadonna, 203 F.3d 228, 234-35 (3d Cir. 2000) (placing plaintiffs lower on promotion ranking lists was adverse action).227 3.

green WARRICK v. NEW JERSEY OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL (2022)

Cited · D.N.J. · signal: see

See Clark, 701 F. App’x at 117 .

green Orseno v. EAGLEVILLE HOSPITAL (2025)

Cited (see also) · E.D. Pa. · signal: see, e.g.

See, e.g., Clark v. Philadelphia Housing Auth. 701 Fed.

unreported