How cited: Cluster 486487 · Go Syfert

Cluster 486487

green · 106 citation events across 23 courts. Showing the 27 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Quote Authority · 11th Cir.
Ctr. v. Bowen, 815 F.2d 1435 , 1446 n.16 (11th Cir. 1987) (“[A] party cannot argue an issue in its reply brief that was not preserved in its initial brief.”).
“[A] party cannot argue an issue in its reply brief that was not preserved in its initial brief.”
Quote Authority · 11th Cir.
Ctr. v. Bowen, 815 F.2d 1435 , 1446 n.16 (11th Cir. 1987) (“In this case, the single footnote in the Secretary’s initial brief did not sufficiently preserve the mootness issue.”); see also Asociacion de Empleados del Area Canalera v. Panama Canal Comm’n, 453 F.3d 1309 , 1316 n.7 (11th Cir. 2006) (“[T]hat argument is waived because it appears only in a footnote in their initial brief and is unaccompanied by any argu- ment.” (citation omitted)); Greenbriar, Ltd. v. City of Alaba…
“In this case, the single footnote in the Secretary’s initial brief did not sufficiently preserve the mootness issue.”
Quote Authority · N.D. Ga.
Ctr. v. Bowen, 815 F.2d 1435 , 1446 n.16 (11th Cir. 1987) (“It is well settled that a party cannot argue an issue in its reply brief that was not preserved in its initial brief.”). will be ‘redressed by a favorable decision’” of the court.
“It is well settled that a party cannot argue an issue in its reply brief that was not preserved in its initial brief.”
green Dees v. New Rez LLC (2022)
Quote Authority · N.D. Ga.
Ctr. v. Bowen, 815 F.2d 1435 , 1446 n.16 (11th Cir. 1987) (“It is well settled that a party cannot argue an issue in its reply brief that was not preserved in its initial brief.”). 13 In the Motion to Vacate, Appellant does not specify under which subsection of Rule 60(b) she seeks relief.
“It is well settled that a party cannot argue an issue in its reply brief that was not preserved in its initial brief.”
green Yancey v. Tillman (2022)
Quote Authority · N.D. Ga.
Ctr. v. Bowen, 815 F.2d 1435 , 1446 n.16 (11th Cir. 1987) (“It is well settled that a party cannot argue an issue in its reply brief that was not preserved in its initial brief.”) supervise.” Woodard v. Town of Oakman, 885 F. Supp. 2d 1216, 1235 (N.D.
“It is well settled that a party cannot argue an issue in its reply brief that was not preserved in its initial brief.”
Quote Authority · 11th Cir.
Ctr. v. Bowen, 815 F.2d 1435 , 1446 n.16 (11th Cir. 1987) (“It is well settled that a party cannot argue an issue in its reply brief that was not preserved in its initial brief.”). 2 Case: 19-11200 Date Filed: 04/24/2020 Page: 3 of 8 § 924(a)(1)(A).
“It is well settled that a party cannot argue an issue in its reply brief that was not preserved in its initial brief.”
Quote Authority · 11th Cir.
Ctr. v. Bowen , 815 F.2d 1435 , 1446 n.16 (11th Cir. 1987) ("In this case, the single footnote in the [appellant's] initial brief did not sufficiently preserve the ... issue.").
"In this case, the single footnote in the [appellant's] initial brief did not sufficiently preserve the ... issue."
Quote Authority · 11th Cir.
Ctr. v. Bowen, 815 F.2d 1435 , 1445 n. 16 (11th Cir. 1987) (“[q]uestions of jurisdiction” such as mootness “can appropriately be raised at any time in the litigation”); Carr v. Saucier, 582 F.2d 14, 15-16 (5th Cir. 1978) (per curiam) (“If a controversy becomes moot at any time during the trial or appellate process, the court involved must dismiss the suit for want of jurisdiction. . . .
“[q]uestions of jurisdiction” such as mootness “can appropriately be raised at any time in the litigation”
Rule Authority · D.C. Cir.
In Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center v. Bowen, 815 F.2d 1435, 1456 (11th Cir. 1987), the Eleventh Circuit rejected the Secretary’s attempt to apply retroactively a new rule concerning reimbursement rates for malpractice insurance “only to hospitals whose claims” that the prior rule was invalid “[we]re still being reviewed,” even 10 though other hospitals challenging the same prior rule had received reimbursement at different rates.
Rule Authority · 11th Cir.
We held that “[t]he case or controversy requirement of the Constitution requires that moot cases be dismissed; in a moot case, there is no longer the vitality and interest among the parties that our adver *1237 sary system of justice requires.” Id. at 1448.
Rule Authority · Ct. Cl.
For thorough canvassing of the legal development and background of the Medicare program, see Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center v. Bowen, 815 F.2d 1435, 1438-40 (11th Cir. 1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1020 , 108 S.Ct. 1573 , 99 L.Ed.2d 888 (1988), and Athens Community Hosp., Inc. v. Scheiker, 743 F.2d 1 , 2-4 (D.C.Cir.1984). .
Rule Authority · D.C. Cir.
V 1987), through a complex reimbursement process, see Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center v. Bowen, 815 F.2d 1435, 1438-40 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1020 , 108 S.Ct. 1573 , 99 L.Ed.2d 888 (1988), furnishes providers of health care services with reimbursements for certain costs associated with the treatment of the aged and disabled.
Rule Authority · D.C. Cir.
V 1987), through a complex reimbursement process, see Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center v. Bowen, 815 F.2d 1435, 1438-40 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 108 S.Ct. 1573 , 99 L.Ed.2d 888 (1988), furnishes providers of health care services with reimbursements for certain costs associated with the treatment of the aged and disabled.
Rule Authority · SCOTUS · 2 citations in this opinion
E. g., Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center v. Bowen, 815 F. 2d 1435, 1453-1454 (CA11 1987), cert. denied, 485 U. S. 1020 (1988); Fairfax Nursing Center, Inc. v. Califano, 590 F. 2d 1297, 1300 (CA4 1979); Springdale Convalescent Center v. Mathews, 545 F. 2d 943, 954-955 (CA5 1977).
Rule Authority · D.D.C.
For a thorough review of the technical aspects of reimbursement see Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center v. Bowen, 815 F.2d 1435, 1438-40 (11th Cir.1987), petition for cert. filed, Sept. 2, 1987. 3 .
Rule Authority · Ct. Cl. · 2 citations in this opinion
Id. at 1457.
Rule Authority · 1st Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
See Mason General Hospital v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 809 F.2d 1220 (6th Cir.1987) (finding retroactive application invalid); Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center v. Bowen, 815 F.2d at 1453 (same).
same
Rule Authority · 1st Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
See Mason General Hospital v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 809 F.2d 1220 (6th Cir.1987) (finding retroactive application invalid); Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center v. Bowen, 815 F.2d at 1453 (same).
same
Cited · 7th Cir. · signal: accord · 2 citations in this opinion
Accord Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center v. Bowen, 815 F.2d 1435 , 1443 n. 12 (11th Cir.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1573 , 99 L.Ed.2d 888 (1988).
Cited · D.C. Cir. · signal: see
See Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center v. Bowen, 815 F.2d 1435, 1453-54 (11th Cir.1987); Mason Gen.
Cited · D.C. Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center v. Bowen, 815 F.2d 1435, 1453-54 (11th Cir.1987); Mason Gen.
Cited (see also) · 11th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center v. Bowen, 815 F.2d 1435 , 1446 n. 16 (11th Cir.1987).
Cited (see also) · 11th Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center v. Bowen, 815 F.2d 1435 , 1446 n. 16 (11th Cir.1987).
Cited (see also) · M.D. Ala. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center v. Bowen, 815 F.2d 1435 , *1148 1446 n. 16 (11th Cir.1987) (Clark, J.) (“It is well settled that a party cannot argue an issue in its reply brief that was not preserved in its initial brief.”) (citing United States v. Oakley, 744 F.2d 1553, 1556 (11th Cir.1984) (per curiam)).
Cited (see also) · 1st Cir. · signal: see also
Ctr. v. Department of HHS, 698 F.2d 1337, 1346 (7th Cir.1983) (rejecting the Secretary’s § 1395oo(d) jurisdictional argument); see also Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center v. Bowen, 815 F.2d 1435, 1458-59 (11th Cir.1987) (finding subsection (f) more relevant, even though the district courts and parties focused on subsection (d)).
Cited (see also) · 4th Cir. · signal: see also
See In re Ghandtchi, 705 F.2d 1315, 1316 (11th Cir.1983); see also Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center v. Bowen, 815 F.2d 1435 , 1445 n. 14 (11th Cir.1987) (noting Ghandtchi court's holding), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1020 , 108 S.Ct. 1573 , 99 L.Ed.2d 888 (1988).
green Clipper v. Takoma Park (1989)
Cited (see also) · 4th Cir. · signal: see also
See In re Ghandtchi, 705 F.2d 1315, 1316 (11th Cir.1983); see also Tallahassee Memorial Regional Medical Center v. Bowen, 815 F.2d 1435 , 1445 n. 14 (11th Cir.1987) (noting Ghandtchi court’s holding), cert. denied, 485 U.S. 1020 , 108 S.Ct. 1573 , 99 L.Ed.2d 888 (1988).