Cluster 4870788

green · 25 citation events across 6 courts. Showing the 12 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 12

green Eliazar Olea v. Teichert Pipelines, Inc. (2021)

Quote Authority · C.D. Cal. · signal: see

See Garcia v. Service Employees □□□□□ Union, 993 F.3d 757, 764 (9th Cir. 2021) (“To determine whether any state law claim is preempted and removable, ‘we need only inquire whether the claim arose under section 301.’”) (emphasis added).

“To determine whether any state law claim is preempted and removable, ‘we need only inquire whether the claim arose under section 301.’”

green Ibarra-Perez v. United States (2025)

Rule Authority · 9th Cir.

Int’l Union, 993 F.3d 757, 762 (9th Cir. 2021). 12 IBARRA-PEREZ V.

green Spencer v. PeaceHealth (2024)

Rule Authority · W.D. Wash.

Int’l 3 Union, 993 F.3d 757, 762 (9th Cir. 2021) (quoting In re Miles, 430 F.3d 1083, 1088 (9th Cir. 4 2005)). 5 “‘[T]he pre-emptive effect of § 301 [extends] beyond suits alleging contract violations’ to 6 state law claims grounded in the provisions of a CBA or requiring interpretation of a CBA.” 7 Kobold, 832 F.3d at 1032 (quoting Lueck, 471 U.S. at 210-11 ).

quoting In re Miles, 430 F.3d 1083, 1088 (9th Cir. 4 2005)

green Tiahrt v. Aria Resort & Casino, LLC (2023)

Rule Authority · D. Nev.

Int’l Union, 993 F.3d 757, 762 (9th Cir. 2021). 1 federal law.”21 The LMRA is “one of just three federal statutes that the Supreme Court has held 2 to ‘so preempt their respective fields as to authorize removal of [state-law] actions.’”22 3 “To determine whether a state-law claim is preempted and removable” under the LMRA, 4 courts “employ a two-step analysis:” The court first “determine[s] whether the cause of action 5 involves a right conferred by state law” or “by a labor…

green Roccaro v. Covenant Living West (2023)

Rule Authority · E.D. Cal.

Int’l 4 Union, 993 F.3d 757, 762 (9th Cir. 2021).

green Moore v. Covenant Living West (2023)

Rule Authority · E.D. Cal.

Int’l 9 Union, 993 F.3d 757, 762 (9th Cir. 2021).

green Moore v. Covenant Living West (2023)

Rule Authority · E.D. Cal.

Int’l 6 Union, 993 F.3d 757, 762 (9th Cir. 2021).

green Jose Mendoza, Jr. v. Amalgamated Transit Union (2022)

Rule Authority · 9th Cir.

Int’l Union, 993 F.3d 757, 762 (9th Cir. 2021).

green Jose Mendoza, Jr. v. Amalgamated Transit Union (2022)

Rule Authority · 9th Cir.

Int’l Union, 993 F.3d 757, 762 (9th Cir. 2021) (holding that § 301(a) “completely preempts state law claims based on contracts between labor unions, which may include union constitutions”).

holding that § 301(a) “completely preempts state law claims based on contracts between labor unions, which may include union constitutions”

green James Gavert,et al v. CF Modesto, LLC (2022)

Rule Authority · E.D. Cal.

See Caterpillar, 482 U.S. at 392 ; 20 Garcia v. SEIU, 993 F.3d 757, 762 (9th Cir. 2021).

green Martinez v. Spruce Holdings, LLC (2021)

Rule Authority · E.D. Cal.

See Caterpillar, 482 U.S. at 392 ; 25 Garcia v. SEIU, 993 F.3d 757, 762 (9th Cir. 2021).

green Moore v. DNATA US INFLIGHT CATERING LLC (2021)

Rule Authority · N.D. Cal. · 2 citations in this opinion

“State law claims that are completely preempted 6 are removable to federal court under the complete preemption corollary to the well-pleaded 7 complaint rule.” Garcia v. Service Employees International Union, 993 F.3d 757, 762 (9th Cir. 8 2021) (citing Caterpillar, Inc v. Williams, 482 U.S. 386 . 392-93 (1987)).

citing Caterpillar, Inc v. Williams, 482 U.S. 386 . 392-93 (1987)