Estate of Otani v. Broudy (2004)
green
· 36 citation events
across 5 courts.
Showing the 8 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2004 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200420152026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
yellow
Deggs v. Asbestos Corp. (2016)
See 6 Washington Practice: Washington Pattern Jury Instructions: Civil 31.01, at 331-32 (6th ed. 2012) (WPI) (identifying separate survival and wrongful death claims, the former for injuries personal to the decedent and the latter for losses to specified beneficiaries); see also Estate of Yaeko Otani v. Broudy, 151 Wn.2d 750, 755 , 92 P.3d 192 (2004) (noting that “wrongful death and survival actions can be distinguished in that the wrongful death statutes govern postdeath da…
noting that “wrongful death and survival actions can be distinguished in that the wrongful death statutes govern postdeath damages of the deceased and the survival statutes govern predeath damages”
yellow
Deggs v. Asbestos Corp. (2016)
See 6 WASHINGTON PRACTICE: WASHINGTON PATTERN JURY INSTRUCTIONS: CIVIL 31.01, at 331-32 (6th ed. 2012) (WPI) (identifYing separate survival and wrongful death claims, the former for injuries personal to the decedent and the latter for losses to specified beneficiaries); see also Estate ofYaeko Otani v. Broudy, 151 Wn.2d 750, 755 , 92 P.3d 192 (2004) (noting that "wrongful death and survival actions can be distinguished in that the wrongful death statutes govern postdeath dam…
noting that "wrongful death and survival actions can be distinguished in that the wrongful death statutes govern postdeath damages of the deceased and the survival statutes govern predeath damages"
green
Dawson v. Naphcare Inc (2022)
Dkt. 9 #222 at 16 (citing Otani v. Broudy, 151 Wn.2d 750, 762 (2004)).
green
Ostling v. City of Bainbridge Island (2012)
Shigaki v. Broudy, 151 Wash.2d 750, 756 , 92 P.3d 192 (2004) (“recovery under the general survival statute is for the benefit of, and passes through, the decedent’s estate, whereas recovery under the special survival statute is for the benefit of, and is distributed directly to, the statutory beneficiaries”).
“recovery under the general survival statute is for the benefit of, and passes through, the decedent’s estate, whereas recovery under the special survival statute is for the benefit of, and is distributed directly to, the statutory beneficiaries”
green
Deggs v. Asbestos Corp. (2015)
See Estate of Otani v. Broudy, 151 Wn.2d 750, 755, 762 , 92 P.3d 192 (2004).
green
Judy R. Deggs v. Asbestos Corporation Limited (2015)
See Estate of Otani v. Broudv. 151 Wn.2d 750, 755, 762 , 92 P.3d 192 (2004).
green
Wilson v. Grant (2011)
See Otani, 151 Wn.2d at 758 .
green
State v. Manro (2005)
See State v. Carson, 128 Wash.2d 805, 820 , 912 P.2d 1016 (1996) (holding that a trial commences when the trial court hears and disposes of preliminary motions). [3] Est. of Otani v. Broudy, 151 Wash.2d 750, 753 , 92 P.3d 192 (2004); State v. Stanley, 120 Wash.App. 312, 314 , 85 P.3d 395 (2004). [4] The juvenile court is a branch or "session" of the superior court.