How cited: Cluster 505544 · Go Syfert

Cluster 505544

green · 45 citation events across 30 courts. Showing the 21 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green Yao v. Kao (2020)
Rule Authority · Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
Aug. 30, 2000); McLean Indus., Inc., 90 B.R. at 618 (“The burden of proof, moreover, squarely rests with [the creditor] in demonstrating its entitlement to setoff in light of the facts of this case.”) (citing Pester Refining Co. v. Mapco Gas Prods., Inc., 845 F.2d 1476, 1486 (8th Cir. 1988) (stating that the burden is on creditors to establish valid rights of setoff)); see also Glob.
stating that the burden is on creditors to establish valid rights of setoff
green Gonzalez v. Selznick (2020)
Rule Authority · Bankr. D. Ariz.
Matter of Pester Refining Co., 845 F.2d 1476, 1486 (8th 25 Cir. 1988). 26 27 28 22 Unless indicated otherwise, statutory citations refer to the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §§ 101 – 1532. 1 B.
Rule Authority · Bankr. S.D.N.Y.
Aug. 30, 2000); McLean Indus., Inc., 90 B.R. at 618 (“The burden of proof, moreover, squarely rests with [the creditor] in demonstrating its entitlement to setoff in light of the facts of this case.”) (citing Pester Refining Co. v. Mapco Gas Prods., Inc., 845 F.2d 1476, 1486 (8th Cir. 1988) (stating that burden is on creditors to establish valid rights of setoff)).
stating that burden is on creditors to establish valid rights of setoff
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
Co., 845 F.2d 1476, 1486 (8th Cir.1988) ("Because it was not properly raised and litigated in the bankruptcy court and was not addressed by that court, we will not address the merits of Mid-America’s setoff claim.”). 6 .Wyse and Williams also contend the bankruptcy court erred in articulating the burden of proof in the hearing on their motion for relief.
Rule Authority · 8th Cir. BAP
Co.), 845 F.2d 1476, 1486 (8th Cir. 1988) and Hofer v. Merchants State Bank, 823 F.2d 271, 272 (8th Cir. 1987) (per curiam) (noting that issue would not be considered on appeal where debtor did not present issue to bankruptcy court by complaint or by motion to reconsider and did not raise issue in designation of issues appealed to district court)).
Rule Authority · 8th Cir. BAP
Pester Refining Co. v. Mapco Gas Products, Inc. (In re Pester Refining Co.), 845 F.2d 1476, 1482 (8th Cir.1988)(it is irrelevant whether the buyer or seller has title to the goods when evaluating the seller’s right to stop a shipment in transit); In re Trico Steel, Co., LLC, 282 B.R. 318, 323-24 (Bankr.D.Del.2002); In re Nevins Ammunition, Inc., 79 B.R. 11, 16 (Bankr.D.Id.1987) (“[W]hether a contract is a ‘shipment’ contract or a ‘destination’ contract is of little or no con…
Rule Authority · 8th Cir. BAP
Pester Refining Co. v. Mapco Gas Products, Inc. (In re Pester Refining Co.), 845 F.2d 1476, 1482 (8th Cir. 1988)(it is irrelevant whether the buyer or seller has title to the goods when evaluating the seller’s right to stop a shipment in transit); In re Trico Steel, Co., LLC, 282 B.R. 318, § 323-24 (Bankr.
it is irrelevant whether the buyer or seller has title to the goods when evaluating the seller’s right to stop a shipment in transit
Rule Authority · D. Ga.
“In order to defeat a debtor’s action for turnover, however, the burden is on the creditor to establish a valid right of setoff under section 553.” Pester Refining Co. v. Mapco Gas Products, Inc. (In re Pester Refining Co.), 845 F.2d 1476, 1486 (8th Cir.1988).
Rule Authority · Bankr. D. Iowa
Similarly, § 542(a) requires "one in possession of property of the bankruptcy estate ... to deliver such property to the trustee unless it is of inconsequential value or benefit to the estate.” Matter of Pester Refining Co., 845 F.2d 1476, 1480 (8th Cir.1988) (citing 11 U.S.C. § 542 (a)). 3 .
Rule Authority · Bankr. S.D. Florida
Pester Refining Co. v. Mapco Gas Products, Inc., (Matter of Pester Refining Co.), 845 F.2d 1476, 1486 (8th Cir.1988).
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
Pester, 845 F.2d at 1487; C.
Cited · 1st Cir. BAP · signal: see
See Pester Refining Co. v. Mapco Gas Prods., Inc. (In re Pester Refining Co.), 845 F.2d 1476 , 1486 (8th Cir.1988) (burden of proof is on the party asserting right of setoff); Barnett Bank of Tampa v. Tower Envtl., Inc. (In re Tower Envtl., Inc.), 217 B.R. 933, 937 (Bankr.M.D.Fla.1997) C'[T]he party asserting the right to setoff has the burden of proof with respect to its validity and propriety.”); see also Juniper Dev.
Cited · 7th Cir. · signal: see
See In the Matter of Pester Refining Co., 845 F.2d 1476, 1482 (8th Cir.1988); In re Murdock Machine and Engineering Co., 620 F.2d 767, 773 (10th Cir.1980).
Cited · 7th Cir. · signal: see
See In the Matter of Pester Refining Co., 845 F.2d 1476, 1482 (8th Cir.1988); In re Murdock Machine and Engineering Co., 620 F.2d 767, 773 (10th Cir.1980).
Cited · Bankr. D. Conn. · signal: see
See In re Pester Refining Co., 845 F.2d 1476 , 1486 (8th Cir.1988).
Cited · Bankr. C.D. Cal. · signal: see
See Pester Refining Co. v. Mapco Gas Products, Inc. (Matter of Pester Refining Co.), 845 F.2d 1476, 1486 (8th Cir.1988).
Cited · Bankr. M.D. Tenn. · signal: see
See In re Pester Refining Co., 845 F.2d 1476 , 1485-86 (8th Cir.1988) (“ ... 11 U.S.C. § 542 (a) states that property of the bankruptcy estate that the trustee may use, sell, or lease under section 363 shall be delivered to the trustee ...
Cited · S.D. Fla. · signal: see
See In re Pester Refining Co., 845 F.2d 1476, 1486 (8th Cir. 1988).
Cited · W.D. Mo. · signal: see
See, In re Pester, 845 F.2d 1476 , 1486 (8th Cir.1988).
Cited · D. Neb. · signal: see
See Neb.Rev.Stat. § 76-301 and In re Pester Refining Co., 845 F.2d 1476 , 1486 (8th Cir.1988).