Cluster 506602

green · 57 citation events across 15 courts. Showing the 7 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 7

green Brilliance Audio, Inc. v. Haights Cross Communications, Inc. (2007)

Quote Authority · 6th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion

See Sebastian Int'l, Inc. v. Consumer Contacts (PTY Ltd.), 847 F.2d 1093 , 1096 (3d Cir. 1988) ("The first sale rule is statutory, but finds its origins in the common law aversion to limiting the alienation of personal property."); H.R.

"The first sale rule is statutory, but finds its origins in the common law aversion to limiting the alienation of personal property."

green Brilliance Audio v. Haights Cross (2007)

Quote Authority · 6th Cir. · signal: see

See Sebastian Int’l, Inc. v. Consumer Contacts (PTY Ltd.), 847 F.2d 1093 , 1096 (3d Cir. 1988) (“The first sale rule is statutory, but finds its origins in the common law aversion to limiting the alienation of personal property.”); H.R.

“The first sale rule is statutory, but finds its origins in the common law aversion to limiting the alienation of personal property.”

green L'AnzA Research International, Inc. v. Quality King Distributors, Inc., a New York Corporation (1996)

Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 4 citations in this opinion

Id. at 1094.

green Summit Technology, Inc. v. High-Line Medical Instruments Co. (1996)

Rule Authority · C.D. Cal. · 8 citations in this opinion

The court recognized that “[a]t first glance, section 602(a) — the importation clause — appears to-clash with the first sale doctrine.” Sebastian, 847 F.2d at 1097.

green Pearson Education, Inc. v. Liu (2009)

Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see

See Sebastian Int’l, 847 F.2d at 1098 n. 1.

green FMC Corp. v. Control Solutions, Inc. (2005)

Cited · E.D. Pa. · signal: see

See Sebastian Int’l, Inc. v. Consumer Contact (PTY) Ltd., 664 F.Supp. 909, 913 (D.N.J.1987), rev’d on other grounds, 847 F.2d 1093 (3d Cir.1988); Drop Dead Co. v. S.C.

green Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (2013)

Cited (see also) · SCOTUS · signal: compare

Compare id., at 221 (case below) (“first sale” doctrine does not apply to copies manufactured outside the United States), with Omega S. A. v. Costco Wholesale Corp., 541 F. 3d 982, 986 (CA9 2008) (“first sale” doctrine applies to copies manufactured outside the United States only if an authorized first sale occurs within the United States), aff’d by an equally divided court, 562 U. S. 40 (2010), and Sebastian Int’l, Inc. v. Consumer Contacts (PTY) Ltd., 847 F. 2d 1093 , 1098…

limitation of the first sale doctrine to copies made within the United States “does not fit comfortably within the scheme of the Copyright Act”