Cluster 538562
green
· 79 citation events
across 10 courts.
Showing the 50 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green
Nicoski v. Kijakazi (2023)
See Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990) (“[T]he ALJ properly focused on the functional limitations caused by [Plaintiff’s condition].”).
“[T]he ALJ properly focused on the functional limitations caused by [Plaintiff’s condition].”
green
Buckner v. Astrue (2011)
See Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990) (“Depression ... is not necessarily disabling.”).
“Depression ... is not necessarily disabling.”
green
Kaitlin Welch v. Frank Bisignano (2026)
See Grable v. Colvin, 770 F.3d 1196, 1200-02 (8th Cir. 2014) (affirming where ALJ considered claimant’s pain in determining RFC, but did not include fibromyalgia because specialists found she did not meet criteria, despite other physicians’ diagnoses of fibromyalgia); Gallus v. Callahan, 117 F.3d 1061, 1064-65 (8th Cir. 1997) (substantial evidence supported ALJ’s finding that claimant did not have mental impairment; diagnosis by one provider was not supported by record, and …
critical question in disability claim is not diagnosis, but rather functional limitations imposed by impairment
Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990).
Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990).
Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990).
green
Shelton v. Social Security Administration (2025)
Listings Shelton next avers that she met a Listing 8.09 for her skin condition, which she alleged presented as boils or lesions.8 Listing 8.09 addresses skin conditions.9 To meet the Listing, a claimant must show chronic pain from the condition despite prescribed adherence to treatment for three months and one of the following: (1) an inability to use both upper extremities for fine and gross motor movements; (2) an inability to use one upper extremity for the same and a nee…
green
Bajalia v. Bisignano (2025)
Minn. May 14, 2025) (citing Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990)), R. & R. adopted, 2025 WL 1555745 (D.
green
Oudom v. Dudek (2025)
Minn. June 7, 2010), citing Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990)).
green
Vanscoy v. Social Security Administration (2024)
Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990).
green
Horn v. Social Security Administration (2024)
McGeorge v. Barnhart, 321 F.3d 766, 769 (8th Cir. 2003). 9 See Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990) (a diagnosis alone does not infer disability; there must be a functional loss establishing the inability to engage in substantial gainful activity). 10 See 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1568 (a), 416.968(b) SSR 83-10 (unskilled work “needs little or no judgment to do simple duties that can be learned on the job in a short period of time”). 9 RFC. ii) Argument that the ALJ …
a diagnosis alone does not infer disability; there must be a functional loss establishing the inability to engage in substantial gainful activity
green
Clark v. O'Malley (2024)
Minn. June 7, 2010) (citing Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990)).
green
DeSalvo v. Social Security Administration (2023)
Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990).
green
Williams v. Social Security Administration (2022)
Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990).
green
Stephen Klick v. Kilolo Kijakazi (2022)
See Warburton v. Apfel, 188 F.3d 1047, 1050-51 (8th Cir. 1999) (finding ALJ’s decision adequate where, although record did not contain precise diagnosis of claimant’s mental impairment, ALJ adequately captured effects of impairment in RFC determination); Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990) (critical question in disability claim is not diagnosis, but rather functional limitations imposed by impairment).
critical question in disability claim is not diagnosis, but rather functional limitations imposed by impairment
green
Wortmann v. Social Security Administration (2022)
Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990).
green
Wilson v. Social Security Administration (2022)
See Dunahoo v. Apfel, 241 F.3d 1033 , 1039–40 (8th Cir. 2001); Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990).
green
Norwood v. Social Security Administration (2021)
Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990).
green
Buckentin v. Kijakazi (2021)
Minn. June 7, 2010) (citing Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990)) (“The mere presence of a medical condition is not per se disabling.
green
Solomon v. Saul (2020)
Mo. Mar. 5, 2013) (citing Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990)), R.&R. adopted sub nom.
green
Brock v. Berryhill (2020)
Id. (citing Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990) (citing 42 U.S.C. § 423 (d)(2)(A)); also citing Domingue v. Barnhart, 388 F.3d 462, 463 (5th Cir. 2004) (diagnosis of depression, without more, does not necessitate a finding of disability)).
citing 42 U.S.C. § 423 (d)(2)(A)
green
Taylor v. Social Security Administration (2020)
Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990).
green
Berry v. Colvin (2015)
Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir.1990).
green
Hinton v. Astrue (2013)
Although it is undisputed that Plaintiff suffers from depression, “[depression ... is not necessarily disabling.” Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir.1990) (finding ALJ had not erred in concluding that claimant had not suffered from severe depression doing relevant time period regardless of two doctors’s findings that she had been depressed at various times).
green
Ostmann v. Massanari (2001)
Wingert v. Bowen, 894 F.2d 296, 298 (8th Cir.1990); Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1365 (8th Cir.1990).
green
Maddox v. Massanari (2001)
Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990); Stanfield v. Chater, 970 F.Supp. 1440, 1458 (E.D.Mo.1997) (where a claimant's mental or emotional problems do not result in a marked restriction of his daily activities, constriction of interests, deterioration of personal habits, or impaired ability to relate, they are not considered disabling).
green
Monier v. Apfel (1998)
Wingert v. Bowen, 894 F.2d 296, 298 (8th Cir.1990); Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1365 (8th Cir.1990).
green
Leitzke v. Callahan (1997)
Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1363-64, n. 3 (8th Cir.1990) (paraphrasing Bowen v. Yuckert, 482 U.S. 137, 140-42 , 107 S.Ct. 2287, 2290-92 , 96 L.Ed.2d 119 (1987)). 9 .
green
Wiley v. Chater (1997)
Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir.1990).
green
Craig v. Chater (1996)
Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir.1990). *1189 After evaluating all the evidence of record, the ALJ determined that plaintiff had mild to moderate bulging of the lumbosacral spine at L4-5.
green
Roger C. FISHER, Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Ap… (1994)
Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir.1990).
green
Schroder v. Sullivan (1992)
Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir.1990).
green
Watson v. Social Security Administration (2025)
See Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990). 9 A hypothetical question need only include those impairment and limitations found credible by the ALJ.
green
Shannon Truxel v. Frank Bisignano (2025)
See Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990) (critical question in disability claim is not diagnosis, but rather functional limitations imposed by impairment).
critical question in disability claim is not diagnosis, but rather functional limitations imposed by impairment
green
Garcia v. Bisignano (2025)
See Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990).
green
Carter v. Dudek (2025)
Accord Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990).
green
Markkanen v. Dudek (2025)
Accord Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990).
green
Zell v. Social Security Administration (2024)
See Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990). 13 Functional limitations must have a basis in the medical evidence and are not established based solely on a claimant’s statement of symptoms. 20 C.F.R. §§ 404.1508 , 416.908; Harris v. Barnhart, 356 F.3d 926, 930 (8th Cir. 2004). 14 An ALJ is not required to include limitations in the RFC that are not supported by the evidence in the record.
green
Quattlebaum v. Social Security Administration (2023)
See Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361 (8th Cir. 1990).
green
Jennifer Porter v. Kilolo Kijakazi (2023)
See Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990) (critical question in disability claim is not diagnosis, but functional limitations imposed by impairment).
critical question in disability claim is not diagnosis, but functional limitations imposed by impairment
green
Hopkins v. Social Security Administration (2023)
See Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990).
See Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990) (holding there must be some evidence to establish a functional loss resulting from said diagnosis).
holding there must be some evidence to establish a functional loss resulting from said diagnosis
See Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990).
green
Eddington v. Social Security Administration (2022)
See Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990).
green
Gierach v. Social Security Administration (2022)
See Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990). 7 Such daily activities undermine her claims of disability.
green
Catterton v. Social Security Administration (2022)
See Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990).
green
Thompson v. Social Security Administration (2022)
See Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990).
green
Catterton v. Social Security Administration (2022)
See Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990).
green
Jackson v. Social Security Administration (2021)
See Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990).
green
Barnes v. Social Security Administration (2021)
See Trenary v. Bowen, 898 F.2d 1361, 1364 (8th Cir. 1990). 3 When evaluating a claimant's subjective complaints of pain, the ALJ must consider objective medical evidence, the claimant's work history, and other evidence relating to (1) the claimant's daily activities; (2) the duration, frequency, and intensity of the pain; (3) precipitating and aggravating factors; (4) the dosage, effectiveness, and side effects of medication; and (5) the claimant's functional restrictions.