Cluster 546965

green · 113 citation events across 30 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 50

green Allied Financial, Inc. v. WM Capital Partners 53, LLC (In re Allied Financial, Inc.) (2017)

Rule Authority · Bankr. D.P.R.

Corp. v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1469 (10th Cir. 1990).

green Newman v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (2015)

Rule Authority · D. Minnesota

Corp. v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1472-1473 (10th Cir.1990) (state law restriction on transfer of letters of credit is preempted by 12 U.S.C. § 1823 , which allows the FDIC to purchase "any assets” of a failed bank).

green BKWSPOKANE LLC v. Federal Deposit Insurance (2014)

Rule Authority · E.D. Wash.

Corp. v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1469 (10th Cir.1990).

green In re Gordon (2013)

Rule Authority · Bankr. N.D. Okla · 2 citations in this opinion

In re AgriBioTech, Inc., 319 B.R. 207 (D.Nev.2004). . 911 F.2d 1466, 1469 (10th Cir.1990). .

green Dubois v. Washington Mutual Bank (2010)

Rule Authority · D.D.C.

Corp. v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1473 (lOth Cir. 1990); Fed.

green RTC Mortgage Trust 1994 N-1 v. Fidelity National Title Insurance (1998)

Rule Authority · D.N.J.

See, e.g., Sahni, 83 F.3d at 1059 (holding that California rule regarding consent necessary for transfer of asset was preempted by 12 U.S.C. § 1821 (d)(2)(G)(i)(II), and citing cases); FDIC v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1473-74 (10th Cir.1990) (holding that asset which was not transferable under state law was transferable under federal law, and drawing analogy from cases finding tort claims freely assignable), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 904 , 111 S.Ct. 1103 , 113 L.Ed.2d 21…

green UMLIC-Nine Corp. v. Lipan Springs Development Corp. (1998)

Rule Authority · D. Colo.

FDIC v. Bank of Boulder; 911 F.2d 1466, 1474 (10th Cir.1990), cert, denied, 499 U.S. 904 , 111 S.Ct. 1103 , 113 L.Ed.2d 213 (1991).

green Vasquez v. Neal (1996)

Rule Authority · 10th Cir.

FDIC v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1469 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 904 (1991). 15 In Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 , 114 S.Ct. 2364, 2369 (1994), the Court held that "habeas corpus is the exclusive remedy for a state prisoner who challenges the fact or duration of his confinement and seeks immediate or speedier release, even though such a claim may come within the literal terms of § 1983." "[W]hen a state prisoner is challenging the very fact or duration o…

green City of Grand Junction v. Ute Water Conservancy District (1995)

Rule Authority · Colo.

Corp. v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1472-73 (10th Cir.1990) (en banc) (emphasis added), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 904 , 111 S.Ct. 1103 , 113 L.Ed.2d 213 (1991).

green Franklin Financial, a New Jersey General Partnership v. Resolution Trust Corporation, Receiver of Benjamin Fr… (1995)

Rule Authority · 9th Cir.

Corp. v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1469-70 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 904 , 111 S.Ct. 1103 , 113 L.Ed.2d 213 (1991) 2 Franklin was, in many ways, an attractive institution to acquire.

green Franklin Financial v. Resolution Trust Corp. (1995)

Rule Authority · 9th Cir.

Corp. v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1469-70 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 904 , 111 S.Ct. 1103 , 113 L.Ed.2d 213 (1991). .

green United States v. Colorado & Eastern Railroad Company, Farmland Industries, Inc., and Maytag Corporation, McKe… (1995)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

FDIC v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1469 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 904 , 111 S.Ct. 1103 , 113 L.Ed.2d 213 (1991).

green United States v. Colorado & Eastern Railroad (1995)

Rule Authority · 10th Cir.

FDIC v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1469 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 904 , 111 S.Ct. 1103 , 113 L.Ed.2d 213 (1991).

green In Re the Receivership of the Mt. Pleasant Bank & Trust Co. (1995)

Rule Authority · Iowa

See, e.g., id.; FDIC v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1471 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 904 , 111 S.Ct. 1103 , 113 L.Ed.2d 213 (1991); FDIC v. Nichols, 885 F.2d 633, 636 (9th Cir.1989).

green Rec. of First Nat. Bank in Humboldt (1994)

Rule Authority · Iowa · 2 citations in this opinion

Corp. v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1470 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 904 , 111 S.Ct. 1103 , 113 L.Ed.2d 213 (1991).

green Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Iowa Growthland Financial Corp. (1994)

Rule Authority · Iowa · 2 citations in this opinion

Corp. v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1470 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 904 , 111 S.Ct. 1103 , 113 L.Ed.2d 213 (1991).

green E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Receiver for United National Ba… (1994)

Rule Authority · D.C. Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion

FDIC v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1475 (10th Cir.1990); FDIC v. Bank of San Francisco, 817 F.2d 1395, 1399-1400 (9th Cir.1987).

green Resolution Trust Corporation, as Conservator for Commonwealth Federal Savings Bank v. Maplewood Investments, … (1994)

Rule Authority · 4th Cir.

Corp. ("FDIC") v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1469 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 904 , 111 S.Ct. 1103 , 113 L.Ed.2d 213 (1991).

green Resolution Trust Corp. v. Maplewood Investments (1994)

Rule Authority · 4th Cir.

Corp. ("FDIC") v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1469 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 904 , 111 S.Ct. 1103 , 113 L.Ed.2d 213 (1991).

green Resolution Trust Corp. v. Heiserman (1994)

Rule Authority · D. Colo.

Corp. v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1474 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 904 , 111 S.Ct. 1103 , 113 L.Ed.2d 213 (1991).

green Resolution Trust Corp. v. Heiserman (1994)

Rule Authority · D. Colo.

Corp. v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1474 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 904 , 111 S.Ct. 1103 , 113 L.Ed.2d 213 (1991).

green Exxon Corporation v. Allen Gann (1994)

Rule Authority · 10th Cir.

FDIC v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1469 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 904 , 111 S.Ct. 1103 , 113 L.Ed.2d 213 (1991).

green Hackford v. Babbitt (1994)

Rule Authority · 10th Cir.

FDIC v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1469 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 904 , 111 S.Ct. 1103 , 113 L.Ed.2d 213 (1991).

green Hackford v. Babbitt (1994)

Rule Authority · 10th Cir.

FDIC v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1469 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 904 , 111 S.Ct. 1103 , 113 L.Ed.2d 213 (1991).

green Resolution Trust Corp. v. Ascher (1993)

Rule Authority · D. Colo.

Corp. v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1474 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 904 , 111 S.Ct. 1103 , 113 L.Ed.2d 213 (1991).

green Resolution Trust Corp. v. Heiserman (1993)

Rule Authority · D. Colo.

Corp. v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1474 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 904 , 111 S.Ct. 1103 , 113 L.Ed.2d 213 (1991).

green Reich v. IBP, Inc. (1993)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Corp. v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1474 (10th Cir. 1990) (citing Milwaukee v. Illinois, 451 U.S. 304, 313-14 , 101 S.Ct. 1784, 1790-91 , 68 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981)); see also Joiner v. City of Macon, 627 F.Supp. 1532, 1535-36 (M.D.Ga.1986) (“Federal common law is inapplicable where Congress has determined by statute — as here the FLSA and the Portal to Portal Act ... — the underlying policy and its enforcement.”).

citing Milwaukee v. Illinois, 451 U.S. 304, 313-14 , 101 S.Ct. 1784, 1790-91 , 68 L.Ed.2d 114 (1981)

green Resolution Trust Corp. v. Hess (1993)

Rule Authority · D. Utah

Corp. v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1474 (10th Cir.1990), cert. denied, - U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1103 , 113 L.Ed.2d 213 (1991), wherein the court said that “resbrt to federal common law is only necessary where Congress has not plainly spoken to the matter under consideration”. 2 However, the Canfield court placed particular emphasis on the savings clause of § 1821 (k) which reads: “Nothing in this paragraph shall impair or affect any right of the Corporation under other appl…

green Comeau v. Rupp (1992)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

But as the Accountants themselves must concede, federal common law ultimately governs the rights of the FDIC, see FDIC v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1474-77 (10th Cir.1990) (en banc), Downriver Community Fed.

green Dababneh v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (1992)

Rule Authority · 10th Cir.

Corp. v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1471 (10th Cir.1990) (en banc), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 111 S.Ct. 1103 , 113 L.Ed.2d 213 (1991).

green Capitol Bank & Trust Co. v. 604 Columbus Avenue R6ealty Trust (1992)

Rule Authority · 1st Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion

See Wood, 758 F.2d at 160-61 (federal holder in due course rule necessary because “the essence of a purchase and assumption transaction is speed”); Campbell Leasing, 901 F.2d at 1248-1249 (same analysis); Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d at 1474-75 (uniform rule of transferability necessary because of time constraints of purchase and assumption).

uniform rule of transferability necessary because of time constraints of purchase and assumption

green In Re 604 Columbus Avenue Realty Trust, Debtor. Capitol Bank & Trust Company v. 604 Columbus Avenue Realty Tr… (1992)

Rule Authority · 1st Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion

See Wood, 758 F.2d at 160-61 (federal holder in due course rule necessary because "the essence of a purchase and assumption transaction is speed"); Campbell Leasing, 901 F.2d at 1248-1249 (same analysis); Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d at 1474-75 (uniform rule of transferability necessary because of time constraints of purchase and assumption). 92 B.

uniform rule of transferability necessary because of time constraints of purchase and assumption

green In Re Sunrise Securities Litigation (1992)

Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.

FDIC v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1476 (10th Cir.1990); see also Blue Rock, 766 F.2d at 748 (where dispute involves ability of a co-maker to a note to raise a defense of impairment of collateral against FDIC “[tjhere is no reason to believe that ... any of the parties predicated their behavior upon state law”).

green Dababneh v. Federal Deposit Insurance (1992)

Rule Authority · 10th Cir.

Corp. v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1471 (10th Cir.1990) (en banc), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1103 , 113 L.Ed.2d 213 (1991).

green Texas American Bancshares, Inc. v. Robert Logan Clarke, the Comptroller of the Currency, Federal Deposit Insu… (1992)

Rule Authority · 5th Cir.

Corp. v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1469 (10th Cir.1990) (determining that the question of whether the FDIC has statutory authority to purchase a letter of credit in a purchase and assumption agreement is a question of law), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1103 , 113 L.Ed.2d 213 (1991).

green Johnson-Bowles Co. v. Division of Securities of the Department of Commerce (1992)

Rule Authority · Utah Ct. App.

Corp. v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1472 (10th Cir.1990) (quoting Pacific Gas & Elec. v. State Energy Resources Conserv. & Dev.

green Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Moss (1991)

Rule Authority · Okla. · 2 citations in this opinion

After FDIC in its corporate capacity acquires assets from the FDIC as receiver, FDIC-corporate may bring suit to recover on those assets "in its own right." F.D.I.C. v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1470 (10th Cir.1990). *618 The distinct capacities become relevant when Moss' counterclaim is considered.

green Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Martin (1991)

Rule Authority · M.D. Fla.

Thus, we hold that § 1821(c)(2)(A) creates a power in FDIC/Corporation to purchase any assets, including assets nontransferable under state law, from FDIC/Receiver in order to facilitate a P & A transaction.” FDIC v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1472-73 (10th Cir.1990). 12 C.F.R. § 569a.6(c)(l) provides: The Receiver shall have the power to: (i) Sell for cash or on terms, exchange, or otherwise dispose of, in whole or in part, any or all of the assets and property of the …

green Adams v. Walker (1991)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Corp. v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1469-70 (10th Cir.1990) (When tendered the appointment of receiver for a failed state bank, the FDIC is statutorily obligated to accept it and, therefore, cannot avoid acting in two capacities in the purchase and assumption option.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1103 , 113 L.Ed.2d 213 (1991). 2 .

green Wallis v. Indymac Federal Bank (2010)

Cited · W.D. Wash. · signal: see

See FDIC v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1470 (10th Cir. *1202 1990) (when the “FDIC is tendered the appointment as Receiver, it is statutorily obligated to accept the appointment”).

when the “FDIC is tendered the appointment as Receiver, it is statutorily obligated to accept the appointment”

green Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. J. William Oldenburg (1994)

Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see

See FDIC v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1469-71 (10th Cir.1990) (en banc) (discussing mechanics of purchase and assumption transaction), cert. denied, 499 U.S. 904 , 111 S.Ct. 1103 , 113 L.Ed.2d 213 (1991).

green Federal Deposit Insurance v. Oldenburg (1994)

Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see

green Comeau v. Rupp (1992)

Cited · D. Kan. · signal: see

See FDIC v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1470 (10th Cir.1990) ("FDIC cannot avoid acting in two capacities in a P & A transaction"), cert, denied, — U.S.-, 111 S.Ct. 1103 , 113 L.Ed.2d 213 (1991).

green Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Isham (1992)

Cited · D. Colo. · signal: see

See generally, FDIC v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1474 (10th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 1103 , 113 L.Ed.2d 213 (1991), (overarching statutory mandate to FDIC is to minimize loss to the insurance fund).

green Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Neitzel (1991)

Cited · D. Kan. · signal: see

See FDIC v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1474-77 (10th Cir.1990) (en banc); Downriver Community Fed.

green The United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians v. The State of Oklahoma, Ex Rel. Davis Moss, District Attorney… (1991)

Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see

See FDIC v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1478 (10th Cir.1990) (en banc).

green Gary v. American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa. (1990)

Cited · W.D. Okla. · signal: see

See Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Bank of Boulder, 865 F.2d 1134, 1137 (10th Cir.1988), aff'd on rehearing en banc, 911 F.2d 1466 (10th Cir.1990).

green Gaff v. Federal Deposit Insurance (1990)

Cited · 6th Cir. · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion

See FDIC v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d at 1476 ; FDIC v. Blue Rock Shopping Center, 766 F.2d 744, 748 (3d Cir. 1985) (“[Njational uniformity is important to permit the FDIC to promote the stability of and confidence in our nation’s banking system.”); FDIC v. Gulf Life Ins.

green Joel R. Gaff v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (1990)

Cited · 6th Cir. · signal: see · 3 citations in this opinion

See FDIC v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d at 1476 ; FDIC v. Blue Rock Shopping Center, 766 F.2d 744, 748 (3d Cir.1985) ("[N]ational uniformity is important to permit the FDIC to promote the stability of and confidence in our nation's banking system."); FDIC v. Gulf Life Ins.

green Federal Deposit Insurance v. Moll (1993)

Cited (see also) · D. Colo. · signal: see also

The application of a federal common law of joint and several liability to the FDIC’s actions against the directors and officers of failed banks satisfies the test set forth in United States v. Kimbell Foods, 440 U.S. 715, 728-29 , 99 S.Ct. 1448, 1458-59 , 59 L.Ed.2d 711 (1979); see also FDIC v. Bank of Boulder, 911 F.2d 1466, 1474 (10th Cir.1990), ce rt. denied, 499 U.S. 904 , 111 S.Ct. 1103 , 113 L.Ed.2d 213 (1991). 30.A uniform system of recovery from culpable directors is…