Cluster 558021
green
· 25 citation events
across 12 courts.
Showing the 18 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green
Nguyen v. United States (2023)
See id. at 351–52; see also Fernos-Lopez v. Figarella Lopez, 929 F.2d 20, 23 (1st Cir. 1991)(“The caselaw does contain various intimations that imminent custody might provide a basis for habeas jurisdiction”).
“The caselaw does contain various intimations that imminent custody might provide a basis for habeas jurisdiction”
green
Garcia v. A. Boncher (2018)
Cf. Duncan v. Walker, 533 U.S. 167, 176 (2001) (“[F]ederal habeas corpus review may be available to challenge the legality of a state court order of civil commitment.”); Fernos-Lopez v. Lopez, 929 F.2d 20, 23 (1st Cir. 1991) (“[A] person incarcerated for civil contempt, even in the domestic relations context, is obviously in ‘custody,’ in the traditional sense, for the purposes of invoking habeas jurisdiction.”).
“[A] person incarcerated for civil contempt, even in the domestic relations context, is obviously in ‘custody,’ in the traditional sense, for the purposes of invoking habeas jurisdiction.”
green
Garcia v. Spaulding (2018)
Cf. Duncan v. Walker , 533 U.S. 167 , 176, 121 S.Ct. 2120 , 150 L.Ed.2d 251 (2001) ("[F]ederal habeas corpus review may be available to challenge the legality of a state court order of civil commitment."); Fernos-Lopez v. Lopez , 929 F.2d 20 , 23 (1st Cir. 1991) ("[A] person incarcerated for civil contempt, even in the domestic relations context, is obviously in 'custody,' in the traditional sense, for the purposes of invoking habeas jurisdiction.").
"[A] person incarcerated for civil contempt, even in the domestic relations context, is obviously in 'custody,' in the traditional sense, for the purposes of invoking habeas jurisdiction."
green
St. John v. Campbell (2026)
We have gone so far as to deem custody "the essential statutory ingredient for initial jurisdiction." Fernos-Lopez v. Figarella Lopez, 929 F.2d 20, 23 (1st Cir. 1991) (per curiam) (quoting United States v. Michaud, 901 F.2d 5, 6 (1st Cir. 1990) (per curiam)).
per curiam
green
Chad L. Hauber v. Roger Klopp (2025)
Meyer v. Weil, 458 F.2d 1068, 1071 (7th Cir. 1972); Elliott v. Cochise Cnty., 212 F. App’x 677, 678 (9th Cir. 2006); Fernos-Lopez v. Figarella Lopez, 929 F.2d 20, 24 (1st Cir. 1991).
green
BERRY v. STATE OF MAINE (2021)
Fernos-Lopez v. Figarella Lopez, 929 F.2d 20, 23 (1st Cir. 1991).
green
LARSEN v. AROOSTOOK UNIFIED COURTS (2020)
Fernos-Lopez v. Figarella Lopez, 929 F.2d 20, 23 (1st Cir. 1991).
green
KINGSLEY v. STATE OF MAINE (2020)
Fernos-Lopez v. Figarella Lopez, 929 F.2d 20, 23 (1st Cir. 1991).
Fernos-Lopez v. Figarella Lopez, 929 F.2d 20, 22 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 886 , 112 S.Ct. 244 , 116 L.Ed.2d 199 (1991); Flood v. Braaten, 727 F.2d 303, 308 (3d Cir. 1984); Franks v. Smith, 717 F.2d 183, 185 (5th Cir.1983); Ingram v. Hayes, 866 F.2d 368, 371 (11th Cir. 1988).
green
Gonzalez-Fuentes v. Molina (2010)
Court, 411 U.S. 345, 351-52 , 93 S.Ct. 1571 , 36 L.Ed.2d 294 (1973); Fer-nos-Lopez v. Figarella Lopez, 929 F.2d 20, 24 (1st Cir.1991) (per curiam); Roba v. United States, 604 F.2d 215, 219 (2d Cir.1979).
Fernos-Lopez v. Figarella Lopez, 929 F.2d 20, 22-23 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 886 , 112 S.Ct. 244 , 116 L.Ed.2d 199 (1991).
green
Rubin v. Smith (1993)
Fernos-Lopez v. Figarella Lopez, 929 F.2d 20, 22 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 244 , 116 L.Ed.2d 199 (1991).
green
Rubin v. Smith (1993)
Fernos-Lopez v. Lopez, 929 F.2d 20, 22 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 244 , 116 L.Ed.2d 199 (1991).
green
Fiumara v. McCarthy (1998)
See Rubin v. Smith, 817 F. Supp. 987, 991 (D.N.H. 1993) (citing Fernos-Lopez v. Lop e z , 929 F.2d 20, 22 (1st Cir.), cert, denied, 502 U.S. 886 (1991)).
green
Smullen v. United States (1996)
See Fernos-Lopez v. Figarella Lopez, 929 F.2d 20, 23 (1st Cir.1991) (holding that the "custody” requirement of 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is determined as of the date a habeas petition is filed), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 886 , 112 S.Ct. 244 , 116 L.Ed.2d 199 (1991); United States v. Michaud, 901 F.2d 5, 6 (1st Cir.1990). 2 .
green
Smullen v. United States (1996)
See Fernos- ___ _______ Lopez v. Figarella Lopez, 929 F.2d 20, 23 (1st Cir. 1991) _____ ________________ (holding that the "custody" requirement of 28 U.S.C. 2255 is determined as of the date a habeas petition is filed), cert. denied, 502 U.S. 886 (1992); United States v. Michaud, _____________ _____________ _______ 901 F.2d 5, 6 (1st Cir. 1990). -2- I.
green
John Brett Allen v. Anthony Belaski, Warden United States Bureau of Prisons United States Marshal (1994)
See Fernos-Lopez v. Figarella-Lopez, 929 F.2d 20, 23-25 (1st Cir.) (holding that custody not established where petitioner was not incarcerated until 22 days after habeas action filed), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 244 (1991).
See Fernos-Lopez v. Figarella Lopez, 929 F.2d 20, 23 (1st Cir.1991); Leonard v. Hammond, 804 F.2d 838, 841 (4th Cir.1986).