How cited: Cluster 577743 · Go Syfert

Cluster 577743

green · 17 citation events across 5 courts. Showing the 8 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
See King v. Chafer, 72 F.3d 85, 87 (8th Cir.1995); Nettles v. Sullivan, 956 F.2d 820, 822-23 (8th Cir.1992).
Rule Authority · 8th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Nettles v. Sullivan, 956 F.2d 820, 822 (8th Cir. 1992).
Rule Authority · 8th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Nettles v. Sullivan, 956 F.2d 820, 822 (8th Cir.1992).
Rule Authority · 8th Cir.
See 42 U.S.C. § 423 (a)(1), § 423(d)(1)(A); Orrick v. Sullivan, 966 F.2d 368, 370 (8th Cir.1992) (per curiam); and Nettles v. Sullivan, 956 F.2d 820, 823-24 (8th Cir.1992).
Cited · E.D. Cal. · signal: see
See Nettles, 956 F.2d at 11 822- 824 (considering whether the claimant made an unsuccessful work attempt and finding the 12 claimant failed to show she was “unable to engage in substantial gainful activity for a period longer 13 than twelve months); Barina, 35 F.3d 555 (unpub.), 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS at *6-8 (4th Cir. Sept. 6, 14 1994) (rejecting the claimant’s argument that she was engaged in an unsuccessful work attempt and 15 upholding the ALJ’s decision that the claimant …
Cited · C.D. Cal. · signal: see
See Nettles v. Sullivan, 956 F.2d 820 , *1186 822-23 (8th Cir.1992) (Although Court did have some sympathy for claimant, her work went over a period of six months, and she had not shown that she could not perform substantial gainful activity for a continuous twelve month period.) B.
green Curtis v. Sullivan (1992)
Cited · D.N.H. · signal: see
See Nettles v. Sullivan, 956 F.2d 820, 822 (8th Cir.1992).
green Guerrero v. Apfel (1999)
Cited (see also) · N.D. Iowa · signal: see also
See Titus v. Sullivan, 4 F.3d 590, 594-95 (8th Cir.1993) (citing Alexander v. Richardson, 451 F.2d 1185, 1186 (10th Cir.1971)); see also Nettles v. Sullivan, 956 F.2d 820, 823 (8th Cir.1992) (a disability benefits claimant who missed work three or four days a month as a result of a painful back condition did not show inability to engage in substantial gainful activity for a period longer than twelve months as required to show disability under 42 U.S.C. § 423 (d)(1)(A)).