How cited: Cluster 580022 · Go Syfert

Cluster 580022

green · 80 citation events across 8 courts. Showing the 20 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Id. at 846.
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Id. at 846.
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Id. at 846.
Rule Authority · 9th Cir.
Id. at 846.
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 4 citations in this opinion
Citizens for Clean Air, 959 F.2d at 841.
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 10 citations in this opinion
Citizens for Clean Air, 959 F.2d at 841.
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 9 citations in this opinion
Citizens for Clean Air, 959 F.2d at 841.
Rule Authority · 9th Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Citizens for Clean Air, 959 F.2d at 844.
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Citizens for Clean Air v. U.S. EPA 959 F.2d 839 , 845 (9th Cir.1992); In re Cherry Berry Bl-25 SWD, UIC Appeal No. 09-02, 2010 WL 3258139 , at *1 n. 2 (EAB Aug. 13, 2010); In re New England Plating Co., 9 E.A.D. 726 , 2001 WL 328213 , at *3 (EAB 2001).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Citizens for Clean Air v. EPA, 959 F.2d 839 , 847 (9th Cir.1992).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Citizens for Clean Air v. EPA, 959 F.2d 839 , 844 (9th Cir.1992). “[I]f the statute is silent or ambiguous with respect to the specific issue, the question for the court is whether the agency’s answer is based on a permissible construction of the statute.” Chevron, 467 U.S. at 843 , 104 S.Ct. at 2782 .
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Citizens for Clean Air v. EPA, 959 F.2d 839 , 844 (9th Cir.1992).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Citizens for Clean Air v. EPA, 959 F.2d 839 , 844 (9th Cir.1992).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Citizens for Clean Air v. EPA, 959 F.2d 839 , 844 (9th Cir.1992) (only “administrative constructions which are contrary to clear congressional intent” will be rejected).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See Citizens for Clean Air v. EPA, 959 F.2d 839 , 844 (9th Cir.1992) (only "administrative constructions which are contrary to clear congressional intent" will be rejected).
green B. v. Brooks-Lasure (2022)
Cited (see also) · N.D. Cal. · signal: see also
In fact, the APA expressly gives district 5 courts such authority. 5 U.S.C. § 704 (“A preliminary, procedural, or intermediate agency 6 action or ruling not directly reviewable is subject to review on the review of the final agency 7 action.”); see also Citizens for Clean Air v. E.P.A., 959 F.2d 839 , 845–46 (9th Cir. 1992). 8 Therefore, because the City and County can channel the action through DHHS and later 9 contest the lawfulness of the relocation plan in the district c…
Cited (see also) · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see also
Portland Cement Corp. v. Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, 417 U.S. 921 -8- (1974)); see also Citizens for Clean Air v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 959 F.2d 839, 845 (9th Cir. 1992). ¶ 38 The selection of which comments are significant necessarily involves a matter of discretion.
Cited (see also) · Ill. App. Ct. · signal: see also
Portland Cement Corp. v. Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, 417 U.S. 921 (1974)); see also Citizens for Clean Air v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, 959 F.2d 839, 845 (9th Cir. 1992). ¶ 38 The selection of which comments are significant necessarily involves a matter of discretion.
Cited (see also) · signal: see also
See also Citizens for Clean Air v. EPA 959 F.2d 839 , 846-47 (9th Cir.1992).
Cited (see also) · signal: see also
See also Citizens for Clean Air v. EPA, 959 F.2d 839 , 846-47 (9th Cir.1992).