Cluster 596178
green
· 115 citation events
across 8 courts.
Showing the 20 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Stat. § 347.088.2 (1); see also Unigroup, Inc. v. O’Rourke Storage & Transfer Co., 980 F.2d 1217 , 1221 (8th Cir. 1992) (“It does not follow that acting according to the terms of the by-law is a breach of good faith and fair dealing.”).
“It does not follow that acting according to the terms of the by-law is a breach of good faith and fair dealing.”
green
Servais v. T.J. Management of Minneapolis, Inc. (1997)
R.Civ.P. 56(e); Celotex Corp., 477 U.S. at 317 , 106 S.Ct. at 2549-50 ; Unigroup, Inc., 980 F.2d at 1219-20.
Moreover, we are unwilling to rewrite what both parties agree is an express and unambiguous bylaw right via the rubric of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing: "[i]t does not follow that acting according to the terms of the by-law is a breach of good faith and fair dealing." Unigroup, 980 F.2d at 1221.
green
Kansas Teachers v. Mutual Guaranty (1997)
Moreover, we are unwilling to rewrite what both parties agree is an express and unambiguous bylaw right via the rubric of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing: “[i]t does not follow that acting according to the terms of the by-law is a breach of good faith and fair dealing.” Unigroup, 980 F.2d at 1221.
green
United States v. Roger D. Workman (1998)
See Unigroup v. O’Rourke Storage & Transfer, 980 F.2d 1217 , 1222 (8th Cir.1992).
green
United States v. Roger Workman (1998)
See Unigroup v. O’Rourke Storage & Transfer, 980 F.2d 1217 , 1222 (8th Cir. 1992).
See Unigroup, Inc. v. O’Rourke Storage & Transfer Co., 980 F.2d 1217 , 1221 (8th Cir.1992); Terry A. Lambert Plumbing, Inc. v. Western Sec.
green
Harmon v. United States (1996)
See Unigroup, Inc. v. O’Rourke Storage & Transfer Co., 980 F.2d 1217 , 1222 (8th Cir.1992).
green
Delores Harmon, Individually and as of the Estate of Ralph Harmon, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. United States … (1996)
See Unigroup, Inc. v. O'Rourke Storage & Transfer Co., 980 F.2d 1217 , 1222 (8th Cir.1992). 56 Harmon has devoted less than three pages of briefing to this issue and has cited only one case.
See Unigroup, Inc. v. O’Rourke Storage & Transfer Co., 980 F.2d 1217 , 1222 (8th Cir.1992) (applying Missouri law).
green
Bobby Lee Chain Jr., in his Capacity as the Executor of the Estate of Betty Chain, Deceased v. Ormonde Planta… (2020)
La. 1989) (holding that “the mere failure to pay ‘fair value’ for stock under a stock redemption agreement” is not “fraud or breach of fiduciary duty”), aff’d., 898 F.2d 150 (5th Cir. 1990); see also Unigroup Inc. v. O’Rourke Storage & Transfer Co., 980 F.2d 1217 , 1221 (8th Cir. 1992) (upholding corporate repurchase provision permitting 20 payment of “book value” and finding that there was no duty to pay “fair value” under that provision); Kanawha-Roane Lands Inc. v. Burfor…
upholding corporate repurchase provision permitting 20 payment of “book value” and finding that there was no duty to pay “fair value” under that provision
green
Njema v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (2015)
Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c); Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-23, 106 S.Ct. 2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); Anderson v. Liberty, Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 249-50, 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986); see also Unigroup, Inc. v. O’Rourke Storage & Transfer Co., 980 F.2d 1217 , 1219 (8th Cir.1992). “‘Only disputes over facts that might affect the outcome of the suit under the governing law will properly preclude the entry of summary judgment.’ ” DePugh v. Smith, 880 F.Supp.…
quoting Anderson, 477 U.S. at 248 , 106 S.Ct. 2505
green
DRB 24, LLC v. City of Minneapolis (2013)
Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e); Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-23 , 106 S.Ct. 2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 249-50 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986); see also Unigroup, Inc. v. O’Rourke Storage & Transfer Co., 980 F.2d 1217 , 1219 (8th Cir.1992). “‘Only disputes over facts that might affect the outcome of the suit under the governing law will properly preclude the entry of summary judgment.’ ” DePugh v. Smith, 880 F.Supp…
quoting Anderson, 477 U.S. at 248 , 106 S.Ct. 2505
green
Edeh v. Equifax Information Services, LLC (2013)
Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(a); Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-23 , 106 S.Ct. 2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 249-50, 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986); see also Unigroup, Inc. v. O’Rourke Storage & Transfer Co., 980 F.2d 1217 , 1219 (8th Cir.1992). “[S]ummary judgment procedure is properly regarded not as a disfavored procedural shortcut, but rather as an integral part of the Federal Rules as a whole, which are designed to …
green
Westley v. Mann (2012)
R.Civ.P. 56(a); Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-23, 106 S.Ct. 2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 249-50, 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986); see also Unigroup, Inc. v. O’Rourke Storage & Transfer Co., 980 F.2d 1217 , 1219 (8th Cir.1992).
green
Tatone v. SunTrust Mortgage, Inc. (2012)
Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c); Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-23, 106 S.Ct. 2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 249-50 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986); see also Unigroup, Inc. v. O’Rourke Storage & Transfer Co., 980 F.2d 1217 , 1219 (8th Cir.1999). ‘“Only disputes over facts that might affect the outcome of the suit under the governing law will properly preclude the entry of summary judgment.’ ” DePugh v. Smith, 880 F.Supp.…
quoting Anderson, 477 U.S. at 248 , 106 S.Ct. 2505
P. 56(c); Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-23 , 106 S.Ct. 2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 249-50, 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986); see also Unigroup, Inc. v. O’Rourke Storage & Transfer Co., 980 F.2d 1217 , 1219 (8th Cir.1999). “‘Only disputes over facts that might affect the outcome of the suit under the governing law will properly preclude the entry of summary judgment.’ ” DePugh v. Smith, 880 F.Supp. 651, 656 …
quoting Anderson, 477 U.S. at 248, 106 S.Ct. 2505
green
Nielsen v. United States Bureau of Land Management (2008)
Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c); Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-23 , 106 S.Ct. 2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 249-50 , 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986); see also Unigroup, Inc. v. O’Rourke Storage & Transfer Co., 980 F.2d 1217 , 1219 (8th Cir.1992). “[Sjummary judgment procedure is properly regarded not as a disfavored procedural shortcut, but rather as an integral part of the Federal Rules as a whole, which are designed to…
Stat. § 347.088.2 (1); see also Unigroup, Inc. v. O’Rourke Storage & Transfer Co., 980 F.2d 1217 , 1221 (8th Cir.1992) (“It does not follow that acting according to the terms of the by-law is a breach of good faith and fair dealing.”).
Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c); Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-23, 106 S.Ct. 2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 249-50, 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986); see also Unigroup, Inc. v. O’Rourke Storage & Transfer Co., 980 F.2d 1217 , 1219 (8th Cir.1992). “[S]um-mary judgment procedure is properly regarded not as a disfavored procedural shortcut, but rather as an integral part of the Federal Rules as a whole, which are designed to …