Cluster 598975
green
· 8 citation events
across 5 courts.
Showing the 8 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Freightways, 90-STA-20, 1992 WL 752678 , at *1 (Dep’t of Labor June 17, 1992) (Good faith belief is “insufficient to establish a violation ... [T]o invoke protection under the first clause of Section 2305(b), a complainant must prove that his assessment of the condition is correct.”); Robinson v. Duff Truck Line, Inc., 86-STA-3, 1987 WL 383080 , at *4-5 (Dep’t of Labor Mar. 6, 1987); but see Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Martin, 983 F.2d 1195 (2d Cir.1993) (upholding protec…
Indeed, the Second Circuit and Northern District of California have both held that the DOL adjudication of whistleblower claims involve rights “so closely integrated into a public regulatory scheme as to be a matter appropriate for agency resolution... .” Yellow Freight Sys., Inc. v. Martin, 983 F.2d 1195, 1200-01 (2d Cir. 1993) (involving a Surface Transportation Act Assistance whistleblower claim); Schmidt v. Levi Strauss & Co., 621 F. Supp. 2d 796, 807 (N.D.
involving a Surface Transportation Act Assistance whistleblower claim
green
Michael Harrison v. Administrative Review Board, U.S. Department of Labor, Roadway Express, Inc., Intervenor (2004)
But see Lambert v. Ackerley, 180 F.3d 997, 1001 (9th Cir.1999) (en banc); Yellow Freight Sys., Inc. v. Martin, 983 F.2d 1195, 1198 (2d Cir.1993). 3 .
green
Calmat Company v. U.S. Department of Labor, Administrative Review Board Robert E. Germann (2004)
But see Yellow Freight, 8 F.3d at 983 n. 1 (affirming the decision not to defer to a grievance arbitration); Yellow Freight Sys., Inc. v. Martin, 983 F.2d 1195,1198-1200 (2d Cir.1993) (same). 8 ■ STAA regulations protect employees’ right to pursue both an STAA claim and a grievance arbitration under a CBA.
green
Lynn Martin, Secretary of U.S. Department of Labor, Robert C. Spinner v. Yellow Freight System, Inc. (1993)
We have addressed and rejected this argument in Yellow Freight System, Inc. v. Lynn Martin, 983 F.2d 1195, 1199-1201 (2nd Cir.1993).
green
Clean Harbors v. Herman (1998)
See Yellow Freight Sys., Inc. v. Reich, 8 F.3d 980, 986 (4th Cir. 1993) (oral complaints to supervisor "are protected activity under the STAA"); Moon v. Transport Drivers, Inc, 836 F.2d 226, 227-29 (6th Cir. 1987) (finding that driver had engaged in protected activity under the STAA where driver had made only oral complaints to supervisors); Stiles, Case No. 92-STA-34, slip op. at 3-4 (citing cases); see also Yellow Freight Sys., Inc. v. Martin, 983 F.2d 1195, 1198 (2d Cir. …
implying but not specifically stating that employee's internal safety complaints were covered by 31105(a)
green
Clean Harbors v. Herman (1998)
See Yellow Freight Sys., Inc. v. Reich, 8 F.3d 980, 986 (4th Cir. 1993) (oral complaints to supervisor "are protected activity under the STAA"); Moon v. Transport Drivers, Inc, 836 F.2d 226, 227-29 (6th Cir. 1987) (finding that driver had engaged in protected activity under the STAA where driver had made only oral complaints to supervisors); Stiles, Case No. 92-STA-34, slip op. at 3-4 (citing cases); see also Yellow Freight Sys., Inc. v. Martin, 983 F.2d 1195, 1198 (2d Cir. …
implying but not specifically stating that employee's internal safety complaints were covered by 31105(a)
green
Clean Harbors Environmental Services, Inc. v. Alexis M. Herman, Secretary, United States Department of Labor … (1998)
See Yellow Freight Sys., Inc. v. Reich, 8 F.3d 980, 986 (4th Cir.1993) (oral complaints to supervisor “are protected activity under the STAA”); Moon v. Transport Drivers, Inc., 836 F.2d 226, 227-29 (6th Cir.1987) (finding that driver had engaged in protected activity under the STAA where driver had made only oral complaints to supervisors); Stiles, Case No. 92-STA-34, slip op. at 3-4 (citing cases); see also Yellow Freight Sys., Inc. v. Martin, 983 F.2d 1195, 1198 (2d Cir.19…