Cluster 667646

green · 281 citation events across 18 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 50

green (PC) Blackman v. Gomez (2021)

Quote Authority · S.D. Cal. · signal: see

See Yourish v. California Amplifier, 191 21 F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir. 1999) (“[T]he public’s interest in expeditious resolution of 22 litigation always favors dismissal.”); Pagtalunan, 291 F.3d at 642 (“The trial judge 23 is in the best position to determine whether the delay in a particular case interferes 24 with docket management and the public interest.”); Nevijel v. North Coast Life 25 Insurance Co., 651 F.2d 671, 674 (9th Cir. 1981) (a court is not required to exhaust 26…

“[T]he public’s interest in expeditious resolution of 22 litigation always favors dismissal.”

green Patton v. Massanari (2001)

Quote Authority · 10th Cir. · signal: see · 4 citations in this opinion

See Glenn, 21 F.3d at 987 (“the [Commissioner] has recognized that, before termination of benefits, the [Commissioner] has the burden of showing that a claimant has the ability to engage in substantial gainful activity”).

“the [Commissioner] has recognized that, before termination of benefits, the [Commissioner] has the burden of showing that a claimant has the ability to engage in substantial gainful activity”

green Rosa H. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security (2026)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Patton v. Massanari, 20 F. Appx. 788, 789 (10th Cir. 2001) (citing Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 987 (10th Cir. 1994); and 20 C.F.R. 404.1594(a)); Jaramillo, 21 F. Appx. at 794 (same).

green Courtney T. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security (2026)

Rule Authority · D. Utah

The burden of proof is on the Commissioner in a termination-of-benefits review.” (citation modified) (citing Hayden v. Barnhart, 374 F.3d 986, 988 (10th Cir. 2004); Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 987 (10th Cir. 1994))). 33 Garcia v. Barnhart, No. CV 02-800 RLP, 2003 WL 27385263 , at *2 (D.N.M.

green L.H. v. Frank Bisignano, Commissioner of Social Security (2025)

Rule Authority · D. Kan. · 2 citations in this opinion

Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 984 (10th Cir. 1994); Lax v. Astrue, 489 F.3d 1080, 1084 (10th Cir. 2007).

green Un v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2025)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 984 (10th Cir. 1994).

green Noller v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2025)

Rule Authority · D. Kan. · 2 citations in this opinion

Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 984 (10th Cir. 1994); Lax v. Astrue, 489 F.3d 1080, 1084 (10th Cir. 2007).

green Sheets v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2025)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 984 (10th Cir. 1994).

green Ingalls v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2024)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 984 (10th Cir. 1994).

green Laurack D. Bray v. Matthew S. Kenefick (2024)

Rule Authority · C.D. Cal.

“Under Ninth Circuit precedent, when a plaintiff fails to amend his 18 complaint after the district judge dismisses the complaint with leave to amend, the 19 dismissal is typically considered a dismissal for failing to comply with a court order 20 rather than for failing to prosecute the claim.” Yourish v. California Amplifier, 191 21 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 1999). 22 “[I]n order for a court to dismiss a case as a sanction, the district court must 23 consider five factors: ‘…

green Balmain v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2024)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Appx. 788, 789 (10th Cir. 2001) (citing Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 987 (10th Cir. 1994); and 20 C.F.R. 404.1594(a)); Jaramillo, 21 Fed.

green Hill v. Clay (2024)

Rule Authority · N.D. Cal.

Mulligan v. Nichols, 835 21 F.3d 983, 988 (9th Cir. 2016).

green Soetaert v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2024)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 984 (10th Cir. 1994).

green Sallee v. Social Security Administration (2024)

Rule Authority · D.N.M.

Hayden v. Barnhart, 374 F.3d 986, 988 (10th Cir. 2004); Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 984 (10th Cir. 1994); see Maes v. Astrue, 522 F.3d 1093, 1096 (10th Cir. 2008); Hamlin v. Barnhart, 365 F.3d 1208, 1214 (10th Cir. 2004); Langley v. Barnhart, 373 F.3d 1116, 1118 (10th Cir. 2004).

green Crowley v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2023)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 984 (10th Cir. 1994).

green Yarborough v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration (2023)

Rule Authority · D. Colo.

The burden of proof is on the Commissioner to show medical improvement “by establishing that the claimant’s medical condition has improved, the improvement is related to the claimant’s ability to work, and the claimant is currently able to engage in substantial gainful activity.” Knapp v. Barnhart, 68 F. App'x 951, 952 (10th Cir. 2003) (citing Glenn v Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 987 (10th Cir. 1994)).

green Ayers v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2023)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 984 (10th Cir. 1994).

green Bennett v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2023)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 984 (10th Cir. 1994).

green Henry v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 984 (10th Cir. 1994).

green Slowter v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 984 (10th Cir. 1994).

green Stakebake v. Kijazaki (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Utah

This court reviews the ALJ’s decision and the whole record to determine if substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s factual findings and whether the ALJ applied the correct legal standards. 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g); Lax v. Astrue, 489 F.3d 1080, 1084 (10th Cir. 2007); Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 984 (10th Cir. 1994).

green Johnson v. Kijakazi (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Utah

This court reviews the ALJ’s decision and the whole record to determine if substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s factual findings and if the ALJ applied the correct legal standards. 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g); Lax v. Astrue, 489 F.3d 1080, 1084 (10th Cir. 2007); Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 984 (10th Cir. 1994).

green Hays v. Kijakazi (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Utah

This court reviews the ALJ’s decision and the record as a whole to determine whether substantial evidence supports the factual findings and whether the ALJ applied the correct legal standards.7 “[A]n ALJ’s factual findings . . . shall be conclusive if supported by substantial evidence.”8 Although the evidentiary sufficiency threshold for substantial evidence is “not high,” it is “more than a mere scintilla.”9 Substantial evidence is “such relevant evidence as a reasonable mi…

green Hargreaves v. Kijakazi (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Utah

Kan. 2020). 8 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g); Lax v. Astrue, 489 F.3d 1080, 1084 (10th Cir. 2007); Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 984 (10th Cir. 1994). 9 Langley v. Barnhart, 373 F.3d 1116, 1118 (10th Cir. 2004). 10 Biestek v. Berryhill, 139 S. Ct. 1148, 1153 , ___ U.S. ___ (2019) (internal quotation marks omitted). 11 Id. at 1154 (internal quotation marks omitted). 12 Id. (internal quotation marks omitted). 13 Lax, 489 F.3d at 1084 (internal quotation marks omitted).

green Bagshaw v. Kijakazi (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Utah

green Barnett v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 984 (10th Cir. 1994).

green Purk v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 984 (10th Cir. 1994).

green Lowery v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 984 (10th Cir. 1994) (quoting Casias v. Secretary of Health & Human Services, 933 F.2d 799, 800-01 (10th Cir. 1991)).

quoting Casias v. Secretary of Health & Human Services, 933 F.2d 799, 800-01 (10th Cir. 1991)

green Watkins v. Kijakazi (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Utah

Finally, the court “examine[s] the record as a whole, including whatever in the record fairly detracts from the weight of the [ALJ’s] decision and, on that basis, determine[s] if the substantiality of the evidence test has been met.” Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 984 (10th Cir. 1994) (quotations and citations omitted.) An impairment is "not severe" when the "medical evidence establishes only a slight abnormality or a combination of slight abnormalities which would have no m…

quotations and citations omitted.

green Miller v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 984 (10th Cir. 1994).

green Osborn v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 984 (10th Cir. 1994).

green Lofton v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 984 (10th Cir. 1994).

green Roach v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 984 (10th Cir. 1994).

green Viau v. Kijakazi (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Utah

green Briggs v. Kijakazi (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Utah

This court reviews the ALJ’s decision and the whole record to determine whether substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s factual findings and whether the ALJ applied the correct legal standards. 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g); Lax v. Astrue, 489 F.3d 1080, 1084 (10th Cir. 2007); Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 984 (10th Cir. 1994). “[A]n ALJ’s factual findings . . . shall be conclusive if supported by substantial evidence.” Biestek v. Berryhill, 139 S. Ct. 1148, 1153 , ___ U.S. ___ (2019…

green Moss v. Kijakazi (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Utah

This court reviews the ALJ’s decision and the whole record to determine (1) whether substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s factual findings and (2) whether the ALJ applied the correct legal standards. 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g); Lax v. Astrue, 489 F.3d 1080, 1084 (10th Cir. 2007); Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 984 (10th Cir. 1994).

green Zimmerling v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 984 (10th Cir. 1994).

green Hodzic v. Kijakazi (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Utah

green Vincent v. Garland (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Utah

green Brunson v. Kijakazi (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Utah

green Wightman v. Kijakazi (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Utah

green Rivas v. Kijakazi (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Utah

No. 12.) decision and, on that basis, determine if the substantiality of the evidence test has been met.” Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 984 (10th Cir. 1994) (internal quotation marks omitted).

internal quotation marks omitted

green Ramirez v. Kijakazi (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Utah

This court reviews the ALJ’s decision and the record as a whole to determine whether substantial evidence supports the ALJ’s factual findings and whether the ALJ applied the correct legal standards. 42 U.S.C. § 405 (g); Lax v. Astrue, 489 F.3d 1080, 1084 (10th Cir. 2007); Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 984 (10th Cir. 1994). “[A]n ALJ’s factual findings . . . shall be conclusive if supported by substantial evidence.” Biestek v. Berryhill, 139 S. Ct. 1148, 1153 , ___ U.S. ___ …

green Ball v. Kijakazi (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Utah

green Hernandez v. Kijakazi (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Utah

green Hood v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 984 (10th Cir. 1994).

green Redding v. Kijakazi (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Utah

quotations and citations omitted.

green Owings v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration (2021)

Rule Authority · W.D. Okla.

Kepler v. Chater, 68 F.3d 387, 392 (10th Cir. 1995) (citing Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 988 (10th Cir. 1994)).

green Pfefer v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2021)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 984 (10th Cir. 1994) (quoting Casias v. Secretary of Health & Human Services, 933 F.2d 799, 800-01 (10th Cir. 1991)).

quoting Casias v. Secretary of Health & Human Services, 933 F.2d 799, 800-01 (10th Cir. 1991)

green Delay v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner of (2021)

Rule Authority · D. Kan.

Glenn v. Shalala, 21 F.3d 983, 984 (10th Cir. 1994) (quoting Casias v. Secretary of Health & Human Services, 933 F.2d 799, 800-01 (10th Cir. 1991)).

quoting Casias v. Secretary of Health & Human Services, 933 F.2d 799, 800-01 (10th Cir. 1991)