How cited: Cluster 6762070 · Go Syfert

Cluster 6762070

green · 17 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 10 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Quote Authority · Fed. Cl.
Co. v. United States, 30 Fed.Cl. 449, 459 (1994) (“SBA’s decision must set forth its rationale with clarity and must be justifiable on that basis”); see DSE, 169 F.3d at 30 .
“SBA’s decision must set forth its rationale with clarity and must be justifiable on that basis”
Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.
Co. v. United States, 30 Fed.Cl. 449, 459 (1994) (explaining that the "SBA’s decisiop must set forth its rationale with clarity, and must be justifiable on that basis"). 7 .
explaining that the "SBA’s decisiop must set forth its rationale with clarity, and must be justifiable on that basis"
Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.
Co. v. United States, 30 Fed.Cl. 449, 459 (1994)).
Rule Authority · Fed. Cl. · 2 citations in this opinion
Co. v. United States, 30 Fed.Cl. 449, 458 (1994).
Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.
Co. v. United States, 30 Fed.Cl. 449, 456 (1994) (stating that “Congress has delegated the power to perform both [rulemaking and adjudication] to SBA”).
stating that “Congress has delegated the power to perform both [rulemaking and adjudication] to SBA”
Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.
The Court also has “the power to remand appropriate matters to any administrative or executive body or official,” including the SBA, “with such direction as it may deem proper and just.” Id. at § 1491(a)(2); Y.S.K Const. Co., Inc. v. United States, 30 Fed.Cl. 449, 459 (1994). 2.
Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.
Co. v. United States, 30 Fed.Cl. 449, 459 (1994); see also Halter Marine, Inc. v. United States, 56 Fed.Cl. 144, 159 (2003).
Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.
Const. Co., Inc. v. United States, 30 Fed.Cl. 449, 459 (1994) (applying section 1491(a)(2) in a bid protest action). 2.
applying section 1491(a)(2) in a bid protest action
Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.
Co. v. United States, 30 Fed.Cl. 449, 453 (1994). .
Rule Authority · Fed. Cl.
Co. v. United States, 30 Fed.
declaring that the court may find a breach only if defendant’s actions were arbitrary and capricious, or constituted a clear and prejudicial statutory or regulatory violation