Emory v. United States (1983)
green
· 20 citation events
across 11 courts.
Showing the 6 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 1983 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
198320042026
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
green
Harker v. State Use Industries (1993)
Vanskike, 974 F.2d at 808 (“courts have not extended the FLSA’s definition of ‘employee’ to cover prisoners who are assigned to work within the prison walls for the prison”); Miller, 961 F.2d at 8 (“courts have uniformly denied FLSA and state minimum wage law coverage to convicts who work for the prisons in which they are inmates”); Worsley v. Lash, 421 F.Supp. 556 (N.D.Ind.1976) (holding that an inmate working as a trustee in the criminal detention ward of a state hospital …
“Prisoners are not employees, within the meaning of the [Act]”
green
Harker v. State Use Industries (1993)
Vanskike, 974 F.2d at 808 ("courts have not extended the FLSA's definition of 'employee' to cover prisoners who are assigned to work within the prison walls for the prison"); Miller, 961 F.2d at 8 ("courts have uniformly denied FLSA and state minimum wage law coverage to convicts who work for the prisons in which they are inmates"); Worsley v. Lash, 421 F.Supp. 556 (N.D.Ind.1976) (holding that an inmate working as a trustee in the criminal detention ward of a state hospital …
"Prisoners are not employees, within the meaning of the [Act]"
Baker v. United States, 222 Ct.Cl. 263, 272 , 614 F.2d 263, 268 (1980).” Emory v. United States, 2 Cl.Ct. 579, 580 (1983).
green
McCaslin v. Cornhusker State Industries (1996)
Apr. 27, 1995) (holding FLSA does not apply to state prison setting); Emory v. United States, 2 Cl.Ct. 579, 580 (“Prisoners are not employees within the meaning of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938.”), aff'd, 727 F.2d 1119 (Fed.Cir.1983).
green
McMaster v. State of Minn. (1993)
Harker v. State Use Industries, 990 F.2d 131 (4th Cir. 1993); Vanskike v. Peters, 974 F.2d 806 (7th Cir.1992), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 1303 , 122 L.Ed.2d 692 (1993); Gilbreath, 931 F.2d 1320 (9th Cir.1991); Miller v. Dukakis, 961 F.2d 7 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 113 S.Ct. 666 , 121 L.Ed.2d 590 (1992); Worsley v. Lash, 421 F.Supp. 556 (N.D.Ind.1976); Quigg v. South, 243 Mont. 218 , 793 P.2d 831 (1990); McGinnis v. Stevens, 543 P.2d 1221 (Alaska 1975); see …
green
Whether a Federal Prisoner Worker is an \Employee\" Within the Meaning of Certain Federal Statutes" (1988)
See Emory v. United States, 2 Cl.