Cluster 706103

green · 8 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 5 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Yellow 1 Green 4

yellow WSB Electric, Inc. v. Curry (1996)

But See · 9th Cir. · signal: but see

But see Associated Builders and Contractors v. Curry, 797 F.Supp. 1528, 1537-38 (N.D.Cal.1992) (holding that the same California statute at issue in Baca is not preempted by ERISA, otherwise it "would vitiate, without any discemable [sic] legislative intent or purpose, the state's traditional power to regulate wages and to establish and enforce other labor standards”), vacated, 68 F.3d 342 (9th Cir.1995) (remanding for decision in light of Dillingham). .

green Associated General Contractors, San Diego Chapter, Inc. v. Smith (1996)

Rule Authority · 9th Cir.

Id. at 719 ; Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. Curry, 68 F.3d 342, 343 (9th Cir.1995) (applying Dillingham); see also MacDonald, 949 F.2d at 275 (action under Nevada prevailing wage law preempted); Hydrostorage, 891 F.2d at 730 (administrative order requiring company to comply with California law setting formal requirements for apprenticeship program preempted).

green 19 Employee Benefits Cas. 2503, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 417, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 678, Pens. Plan Guide P … (1996)

Rule Authority · 9th Cir.

Id. at 719; Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. Curry, 68 F.3d 342, 343 (9th Cir.1995) (applying Dillingham ); see also MacDonald, 949 F.2d at 275 (action under Nevada prevailing wage law preempted); Hydrostorage, 891 F.2d at 730 (administrative order requiring company to comply with California law setting formal requirements for apprenticeship program preempted).

green Ellis v. Costco Wholesale Corp. (2011)

Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see

See Associated Builders & Contractors, Inc. v. Curry, 68 F.3d 342, 343 (9th Cir.1995).

green Wsb Electric, Inc. And J.R. Roberts Corporation v. James Curry, in His Official Capacity as the Labor Commiss… (1996)

Cited (see also) · 9th Cir. · signal: see also

Therefore, we affirm the district court's judgment that ERISA does not preempt California's two-tier prevailing wage scheme. 1 Section 514(a) provides that ERISA "supersede[s] any and all State laws insofar as they may now or hereafter relate to any employee benefit plan." 29 U.S.C. § 1144 (a); see also 29 U.S.C. § 1002 (1) (defining employee benefit plans) 2 But see Associated Builders and Contractors v. Curry, 797 F.Supp. 1528, 1537-38 (N.D.Cal.1992) (holding that the same…