Cluster 719614
green
· 23 citation events
across 10 courts.
Showing the 5 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green
Encarnacion Ex Rel. George v. Barnhart (2002)
See also Good Samaritan, 85 F.3d at 1060 (“If ... the statute is silent or ambiguous with respect to the specific issue, we must defer to any reasonable construction of the statute by the Secretary.”).
“If ... the statute is silent or ambiguous with respect to the specific issue, we must defer to any reasonable construction of the statute by the Secretary.”
green
Memorial Hospital of South Bend v. Azar (2022)
Ctr. v. Shalala, 85 F.3d 1057 , 1062 (2d Cir. 1996) (“[B]ecause the only final decision reached by the PRRB was that it lacked jurisdiction to review Empire’s reopening denials, the district court was limited to reviewing this decision and did not have jurisdiction to review the merits of Empire’s reopening decisions.”).
“[B]ecause the only final decision reached by the PRRB was that it lacked jurisdiction to review Empire’s reopening denials, the district court was limited to reviewing this decision and did not have jurisdiction to review the merits of Empire’s reopening decisions.”
green
Community Health Care Ass'n of New York v. DeParle (1999)
Under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), a federal court may set aside agency findings of fact found to be arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with the law. § 5 U.S.C. 706; Supreme Oil Co. v. Metropolitan Transportation Authority, 157 F.3d 148, 151 (2d Cir.1998); Good Samaritan Hospital Regional Medical Center v. Shalala, 85 F.3d 1057, 1060 (2d Cir.1996).
green
Salazar v. Reich (1996)
E.g., Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 467 U.S. 837, 842-43 , 104 S.Ct. 2778, 2781-82 , 81 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984); Good Samaritan Hospital Regional Medical Center. v. Shalala, 85 F.3d 1057, 1060 (2d Cir.1996); Rye Psychiatric Hospital Center, Inc. v. Shalala, *101 52 F.3d 1163, 1168 (2d Cir.1995).
green
Huntington Hospital v. Shalala (2001)
Under the second step of *383 Chevron, the Court asks only “whether the agency’s answer is based on a permissible construction of the statute.” Chevron, 467 U.S. at 843 , 104 S.Ct. at.2782; see Good Samaritan Hospital Regional Medical Ctr. v. Shalala, 85 F.3d 1057 , 1060 (2d Cir.1996). “ ‘The view of the agency charged with administering the statute is entitled to considerable deference.’ ” Young v. Community Nutrition Institute, 476 U.S. 974, 981 , 106 S.Ct. 2360, 2365 , 90…