Cluster 7314829
green
· 34 citation events
across 7 courts.
Showing the 26 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green
Cangrejeros de Santurce Baseball Club, LLC v. Liga de Beisbol Profesional de Puerto Rico, Inc. (2025)
See Garber v. Off. of the Comm'r of Baseball, 120 F. Supp. 3d 334, 339 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) ("[T]he scope of the baseball exemption is not a jurisdictional issue.
"[T]he scope of the baseball exemption is not a jurisdictional issue. It is a threshold merits issue."
green
George Mandala, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. NTT Data, Inc. (2026)
As a result, even when the elements of section 1292(b) are satisfied, “the district court retains unfettered discretion to deny certification.” Garber v. Office of the Com’ of Baseball, 120 F. Supp. 3d 334, 337 (S.D.N.Y. 2014).
green
Christina Medina v. AAM 15 Management LLC (2025)
July 6, 2021) (quoting Garber v. Off. of the Comm’r of Baseball, 120 F. Supp. 3d 334, 337 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)), as “interlocutory appeals are presumptively disfavored,” Quartararo, 521 F. Supp. 3d at 265 (quoting McGraw-Hill Glob.
green
Sharma v. Rent the Runway, Inc. (2025)
Ultimately, “even when the elements of [S]ection 1292(b) are satisfied, the district court retains ‘unfettered discretion’ to deny certification.” Garber v. Office of the Commissioner of Baseball, 120 F. Supp. 3d 334, 337 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (quoting National Asbestos Workers Medical Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc., 71 F. Supp. 2d 139 , 162–63 (E.D.N.Y. 1999)); In re Facebook, Inc., 986 F. Supp. 2d at 530 (stating that a district court’s decision may be for “any reason”) (citation o…
quoting National Asbestos Workers Medical Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc., 71 F. Supp. 2d 139 , 162–63 (E.D.N.Y. 1999)
green
De Oliveira v. Tenet Healthcare (2025)
However, “even when the elements of section 1292(b) are satisfied, the district court retains unfettered discretion to deny certification.” Garber v. Off. of the Com’r of Baseball, 120 F. Supp. 3d 334, 337 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (internal quotation marks omitted).
internal quotation marks omitted
green
B & R Supermarket, Inc. v. Visa, Inc. (2025)
Nov. 16, 2020) (quoting Garber v. Off. of the Comm’r of Baseball, 120 F. Supp. 3d 334, 337 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)); James, 715 F. Supp. 2d at 218 (“Substantial ground for a difference of opinion requires more than a claim that the court’s ruling was wrong. . . . [S]imply because a question is particularly difficult does not mean that there is a difference of opinion.” (quoting United States ex rel.
green
In Re Amazon.com, Inc. eBook Antitrust Litigation (2025)
Nov. 16, 2020) (quoting Garber v. Office of the Comm’r of Baseball, 120 F. Supp. 3d 334, 337 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)).
green
New v. M&T Bank Corporation (2024)
“Interlocutory appeals are presumptively disfavored,” and “even when the elements of section 1292(b) are satisfied, the district court retains unfettered discretion to deny certification.” Garber v. Off. of Comm’r of Baseball, 120 F. Supp. 3d 334, 337 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (internal quotation marks omitted).
internal quotation marks omitted
green
Teta v. Go New York Tours, Inc. (2024)
Finally, “even when the elements of [S]ection 1292(b) are satisfied, the district court retains ‘unfettered discretion’ to deny certification.” Garber v. Office of the Commissioner of Baseball, 120 F. Supp. 3d 334, 337 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (quoting National Asbestos Workers Medical Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc., 71 F. Supp. 2d 139 , 162–63 4 Supra footnote 3.
quoting National Asbestos Workers Medical Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc., 71 F. Supp. 2d 139 , 162–63 4 Supra footnote 3. (E.D.N.Y. 1999)
But if “the silence of an appellate court” were sufficient to satisfy the requirements of § 1292(b), then interlocutory appeals “would be the norm, not the exception.” Garber v. Off. of the Comm’r of Baseball, 120 F. Supp. 3d 334, 338 (S.D.N.Y. 2014).
green
Rosenberg v. Rosenberg (2023)
July 6, 2021) (quoting Garber v. Off. of the Comm'r of Baseball, 120 F. Supp. 3d 334, 337 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)), because “interlocutory appeals are presumptively disfavored,” Quartararo, 521 F. Supp. 3d at 273 (alteration omitted) (quoting McGraw-Hill Glob.
Conflicting authority entails more than a “simple disagree- ment[.]” Garber v. Office of the Comm’r of Baseball, 120 F. Supp. 3d 334, 337 (S.D.N.Y. 2014).
green
Silver v. Hauser (2023)
“Interlocutory appeals are presumptively disfavored,” and “even when the elements of section 1292(b) are satisfied, the district court retains unfettered discretion to deny certification.” Garber v. Off. of Comm’r of Baseball, 120 F. Supp. 3d 334, 337 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (internal quotation marks omitted).
internal quotation marks omitted
green
HERMES INTERNATIONAL and HERMES OF PARIS, INC. v. \MASON ROTHSCHILD\" a/k/a SONNY ESTIVAL" (2022)
Even if it had not, “the silence of an appellate court is not enough to satisfy [§] 1292(b),” for otherwise the mere fact that an appellate court cannot anticipate and address every legal issue that could possibly be raised by litigants would make interlocutory appeals “the norm, [rather than] the exception.” Garber v. Office of the Comm’r of Baseball, 120 F. Supp. 3d 334, 338 (S.D.N.Y. 2014).
July 6, 2021) (quoting Garber v. Off. of the Comm’r of Baseball, 120 F. Supp. 3d 334, 337 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)), because “interlocutory appeals are presumptively disfavored,” Quartararo, 521 F. Supp. 3d at 273 (alteration omitted) (quoting 3 McGraw-Hill Glob.
July 6, 2021) (quoting Garber v. Off. of the Comm’r of Baseball, 120 F. Supp. 3d 334, 337 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)), since “interlocutory appeals are presumptively disfavored,” Quartararo, 521 F. Supp. 3d at 265 (quoting McGraw- Hill Glob.
green
Belya v. Kapral (2021)
But “even when the elements of section 1292(b) are satisfied, the district court retains ‘unfettered discretion’ to deny certification.” Garber v. Office of the Comm'r of Baseball, 120 F.Supp.3d 334, 337 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (quoting National Asbestos Workers Med.
quoting National Asbestos Workers Med. Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc., 71 F. Supp. 2d 139 , 162–63 (E.D.N.Y. 1999)
Nov. 16, 2020) (quoting Garber v. Office of the Comm’r of Baseball, 120 F. Supp. 3d 334, 337 (S.D.N.Y. 2014)).
green
Laufer v. Dove Hess Holdings, LLC (2021)
To establish the second prong—that a “substantial ground for difference of opinion” exists—the moving party must show that “(1) there is conflicting authority on the issue, or (2) the issue is particularly difficult and of first impression for the Second Circuit.” Garber v. Office of the Comm’r of Baseball, 120 F. Supp. 3d 334, 337 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (quoting Florio v. City of New York, No. 06-cv-6473, 2008 WL 3068247 , at *1, 2008 U.S. Dist.
quoting Florio v. City of New York, No. 06-cv-6473, 2008 WL 3068247 , at *1, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 59022 , at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 5, 2008)
Garber v. Office of the Comm’r of Baseball, 120 F. Supp. 3d 334, 337 (S.D.N.Y. 2014).
Still, “even when the elements of section 1292(b) are satisfied, the district court retains ‘unfettered discretion’ to deny certification.” Garber v. Office of the Comm’r of Baseball, 120 F. Supp. 3d 334, 337 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (quoting Nat’l Asbestos Workers Med.
quoting Nat’l Asbestos Workers Med. Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc., 71 F. Supp. 2d 139 , 162–63 (E.D.N.Y. 1999)
green
Yi Xiang v. Inovalon Holdings, Inc. (2017)
But “even when the elements of section'’1292(b) are satisfied, the district court retains ‘unfettered discretion’ to deny certification.” Garber v. Office of the Comm’r of Baseball, 120 F.Supp.3d 334, 337 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (quoting National Asbestos Workers Med.
quoting National Asbestos Workers Med. Fund v. Philip Morris, Inc., 71 F.Supp.2d 139, 162-63 (E.D.N.Y. 1999)
green
Hecklerco, LLC v. YuuZoo Corp. (2017)
But “even when the elements of section 1292(b) are satisfied, the district court retains ‘unfettered discretion’ to deny certification.” Garber v. Office of the Comm’r of Baseball, 120 F.Supp.3d 334, 337 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (quoting National Asbestos Workers Med.
quoting National Asbestos Workers Med. Fund v. Philip Morris. Inc., 71 F.Supp.2d 139, 162-63 (E.D.N.Y. 1999)
green
Youngers v. Virtus Investment Partners Inc. (2017)
LEGAL STANDARD “Interlocutory appeals are presumptively disfavored.” Garber v. Office of the Com’r of Baseball, 120 F.Supp.3d 334, 337 (S.D.N.Y. 2014). “[0]nly exceptional circumstances [will] justify a departure from the basic policy of postponing appellate review until after the entry of a final judgment.” In re Facebook, Inc., IPO Sec. & Derivative Litig., 986 F.Supp.2d 524, 529-30 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (quoting McNeil v. Aguilos, 820 F.Supp. 77, 79 (S.D.N.Y. 1993) (alteration …
green
Jackson v. Caribbean Cruise Line, Inc. (2015)
Attempting to reconcile this language, one district court recently concluded that “the ‘difficult and of first impression’ language refers to situations in which Second Circuit input could help resolve disagreements among other Courts of Appeals.” Garber v. Office of the Com’r of Baseball, — F.Supp.3d -, -, No. 12 CIV. 3704(SAS), 2014 WL 4716068, at *2 (S.D.N.Y.
green
Linzy v. Uber Technologies, Inc. (2024)
See, e.g., Garber v. Off. of the Comm’r of Baseball, 120 F. Supp. 3d 334, 337 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (“[E]ven when the elements of section 1292(b) are satisfied, the district court retains ‘unfettered discretion’ to deny certification.” (citation omitted)).
“[E]ven when the elements of section 1292(b) are satisfied, the district court retains ‘unfettered discretion’ to deny certification.” (citation omitted)