How cited: Cluster 7321101 · Go Syfert

Cluster 7321101

green · 28 citation events across 7 courts. Showing the 11 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Quote Authority · 4th Cir.
Inc. v. Yates Select Auto Sales, LLC, 195 F. Supp. 3d 818, 833 (E.D.
“Without evidence as to the extent of actual day-to-day use of [third-party] marks, 29 USCA4 Appeal: 23-1150 Doc: 60 Filed: 04/15/2024 Pg: 30 of 33 the probative value of such evidence is minimal.”
Rule Authority · D. Maryland · 2 citations in this opinion
Select Auto Imports, supra, 195 F.Supp. 3d at 818.
green Whitten v. Johnson (2023)
Rule Authority · W.D. Va.
Inc. v. Yates Select Auto Sales, LLC, 195 F. Supp. 3d 818, 823 (E.D.
citing Penn-Texas Corp. v. Morse, 242 F.2d 243, 247 (7th Cir. 1957). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a)(1
Rule Authority · N.D.W. Va.
Select Auto Imports Inc. v. Yates Select Auto Sales, LLC, 195 F. Supp. 3d 818, 835 (E.D.
listing several cases where courts found two marks sufficiently similar because they shared dominant words
Rule Authority · N.D.W. Va.
Select Auto Imports Inc. v. Yates Select Auto Sales, LLC, 195 F. Supp. 3d 818, 835 (E.D.
listing several cases where courts found two marks sufficiently similar because they shared dominant words
green Faver v. Clarke (2019)
Rule Authority · W.D. Va.
Inc. v. Yates Select Auto Sales, LLC, 195 F. Supp. 3d 818, 823 (E.D.
Cited · E.D. Va. · signal: see
However, “buyer sophistication will only be a key factor when the relevant market is not the public at large.” Jd.; see Select Auto Imports Inc. v. Yates Select Auto Sales, LLC, 195 F. Supp. 3d 818, 840 (E.D.
finding this factor “neutral” when the relevant consumer base was the general automobile-purchasing public
Cited · E.D. Va. · signal: see
See Select Auto Imports Inc. v. Yates Select Auto Sales, LLC , 195 F.Supp.3d 818 , 831 (E.D.
Cited · D. Maryland · signal: accord · 3 citations in this opinion
Va. 2000) (finding the GREAT MINDS OF MEDICINE mark “extremely similar” to GREAT MINDS OF THE WESTERN INTELLECTUAL TRADITION mark); accord Select Auto Imports Inc. v. Yates Select Auto Sales, LLC, 195 F.Supp.3d 818, 835-36 (E.D.
Cited (see also) · W.D. Va. · signal: see also
Compl. ¶¶ 15, 35–39; see also Select Auto Imports Inc. v. Yates Select Auto Sales, LLC, 195 F. Supp. 3d 818, 837 (E.D.
explaining that “[a] finding of similarity of advertising requires ‘some degree of overlap’ among the parties’ outlets and customers bases, but the two need not be identical”
Cited (see also) · N.D. Ga. · signal: see also
Mich. 1972) ; see also Select Auto Imps., Inc. v. Yates Select Auto Sales, LLC , 195 F. Supp. 3d 818 , 836 (E.D.
stating that the "addition of a house mark can aggravate, rather than mitigate confusion"