How cited: Cluster 7326359 · Go Syfert

Cluster 7326359

green · 53 citation events across 4 courts. Showing the 18 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Quote Authority · E.D.N.C. · signal: see
However, the NCEEPA is applicable “to common law wrongful discharge claims or in connection with other specific statutory remedies.” McLean v. Patten Communities, Inc., 332 F.3d 714, 720 (4th Cir. 2003); see Howard v. Coll. of the Albemarle, 262 F. Supp. 3d 322, 336 (E.D.N.C. 2017) (“To prove a claim of wrongful discharge in violation of North Carolina public policy, a plaintiff must identify and rely upon a specific North Carolina statute or North Carolina constitutional pr…
“To prove a claim of wrongful discharge in violation of North Carolina public policy, a plaintiff must identify and rely upon a specific North Carolina statute or North Carolina constitutional provision stating North Carolina’s public policy.”
Rule Authority · W.D.N.C.
Such an employee must “allege ‘specific conduct by a defendant that violated a specific expression of North Carolina public policy’ in a specific North Carolina statute or a specific provision in the North Carolina Constitution.” Howard v. Coll. of the Albemarle, 262 F. Supp. 3d 322, 336 (E.D.N.C.
Rule Authority · E.D.N.C.
May 26, 2017) (unpublished); Howard v. Coll. of the Albemarle, 262 F. Supp. 3d 322, 340-41 (E.D.N.C.), aff'd, 697 F. App’x 257 (4th Cir. 2017) (per curiam) (unpublished); Efird v. Riley, 342 F. Supp. 2d 413, 427 (M.D.N.C. 2004); see, e.g., Hogan, 79 N.C.
per curiam
green York v. Lutz (2023)
Rule Authority · E.D.N.C.
Howard v. Coll. of the Albemarle, 262 F. Supp. 3d 322, 340 (E.D.N.C. 2017); Buser v. S. Food Serv., Inc., 73 F. Supp. 2d 556, 573 (M.D.N.C. 1999).
Rule Authority · E.D.N.C.
Express Corp., 703 F.3d 713, 722 (4th Cir. 2013); Howard v. Coll, of the Albemarle, 262 F. Supp. 3d 322, 332-33 (E.D.N.C.), aff'd, 697 F. App’x 257 (4th Cir. 2017) (per curiam) (unpublished); Iskander v. Dep't of Navy, 116 F. Supp. 3d 669, 678-79 (E.D.N.C.), affd, 625 F. App’x 211 (4th Cir. 2015) (per curiam) (unpublished); Fisher v. Asheville-Buncombe Tech.
per curiam
Rule Authority · M.D.N.C.
“An employer is entitled to summary judgment on the issue of pretext if the employee ‘create[s] only a weak issue of fact as to whether the employer’s reason [is] untrue and there [is] abundant and uncontroverted independent evidence that no discrimination had occurred.’” Howard v. Coll. of the Albermarle, 262 F. Supp. 3d 322, 332 (E.D.N.C. 2017) (quoting Reeves, 530 U.S. at 148 ), aff’d, 697 Fed.
quoting Reeves, 530 U.S. at 148
Rule Authority · D.S.C.
“An employer is entitled to summary judgment on the issue of pretext if the employee ‘create[s] only a weak issue of fact as to whether the employer’s reason [is] untrue and there [is] abundant and uncontroverted independent evidence that no discrimination had occurred.’” Howard v. Coll. of the Albemarle, 262 F. Supp. 3d 322, 332 (E.D.N.C. 2017) (quoting Reeves, 530 U.S. at 148 ).
quoting Reeves, 530 U.S. at 148
Rule Authority · E.D.N.C.
Coin Caterers Corp., 517 U.S. 308, 310-13 (1996); Hill v. Lockheed Martin Logistics Mgmt., Inc., 354 F.3d 277 , 285 (4th Cir. 2004) (en banc), overruled in part on other grounds by Gross, 557 U.S. at 177-80 ; Howard v. Coll. of the Albemarle, 262 F. Supp. 3d 322, 335 (E.D.N.C.), aff'd, 697 F. App’x 257 (4th Cir. 2017) (per curiam) (unpublished); Wood v. Town of Warsaw, 914 F. Supp. 2d 735, 739-40 (E.DN.C. 2012).
per curiam
Rule Authority · E.D.N.C.
See O’Connor, 517 U.S. at 310-13 ; Hill, 354 F.3d at 285; Howard v. Coll. of the Albemarle, 262 F. Supp. 3d 322, 335 (E.D.N.C. 2017), aff'd, 697 F. App’x 257 (4th - Cir. 2017) (per curiam) (unpublished); Wood v. Town of Warsaw, 914 F. Supp. 2d 735, 739-40 (E.DN.C. 2012).
Rule Authority · E.D.N.C.
See O’Connor, 517 U.S. at 310-13 ; Hill, 354 F.3d at 285; Howard v. College of the Albemarle, 262 F. Supp. 3d 322, 335 (E.D.N.C. 2017), aff'd, 697 F. App’x. 257 (4th Cir. 2017) (per curiam) (unpublished); Wood v. Town of Warsaw, 914 F. Supp. 2d 735, 739-40 (E.D.N.C. 2012).
Rule Authority · E.D.N.C.
May 2, 2017) (unpublished), aff'd, 703 F. App’x 211 (4th Cir. 2017) (per curiam) (unpublished); Howard v. Coll. of the Albemarle, 262 F. Supp. 3d 322, 331 (E.D.N.C. 2017), affd, 697 F. App’x 257 (4th Cir. 2017) (per curiam) (unpublished).
Cited · E.D.N.C. · signal: see
See id.
Cited · E.D.N.C. · signal: see
See Howard v. Coll. of the Albermarle, 262 F. Supp. 3d 322 , 329 n.1 (E.D.N.C. 2017), aff-d, 697 F. App’x 257 (per curiam) (unpublished).
Cited · E.D.N.C. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See id. [J at 61-62.
Cited · E.D.N.C. · signal: see
See Howard v. Coll. of the Albermarle, 262 F. Supp. 3d 322 , 329 n.1 (E.D.N.C.), aff'd, 697 F. App'x 257 (4th Cir. 2017) (per curiam) (unpublished).
per curiam
Cited · E.D.N.C. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Howard v. Coll. the Albermarle, 262 F. Supp. 3d 322 , 329 n.1 (E.D.N.C.), aff'd, 697 F. App’x 257 (4th Cir. 2017) curiam) (unpublished).
green Amos v. Welles (2020)
Cited · E.D.N.C. · signal: see
See Howard v. Coll. of the Albermarle, 262 F. Supp. 3d 322 , 329 n.1 (E.D.N.C.), aff'd, 697 F. App’x 257 (4th Cir. 2017) (per curiam) (unpublished).
per curiam
Cited · E.D.N.C. · signal: see
See Howard v. Coll. of the Albermarle, 262 F. Supp. 3d 322 , 329 n.1 (E.D.N.C.), aff'd, 697 F. App'x 257 (4th Cir. 2017) (per curiam) (unpublished).
per curiam