Cluster 7634591

green · 3 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 3 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 3

green Daisy Ellis, Lindsey Dubose, and Samantha Maza v. Richard M. Ireland, Jr (2025)

Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.

R.S. 9:3252(A) specifically states that the failure to submit the security deposit “within thirty days after written demand for a refund shall constitute willful failure.” Additionally, it is “well settled that even if there is a valid dispute over a lease, a lessor must comply with the statute or suffer the 9 See n. 3 24 penalties provided.” Woodery v. Smith, 527 So.2d 389, 390 (La. 4th Cir. App. 1988) (citing Altazin v. Pirello, 391 So.2d 1267, 1269 (La.

citing Altazin v. Pirello, 391 So.2d 1267, 1269 (La. App. 1st Cir.1980

green Rickeshia-Raquel Devall v. Home Finders International, Inc. and Natalie W. Gamble (2023)

Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.

Woodery v. Smith, 527 So.2d 389, 390 (La.

quoting Garb v. Clayton-Kent Builders, Inc., 307 So.2d 813, 815 (La. App. 1st Cir. 1975)

green Webapps, LLC v. Murdock (2016)

Rule Authority · La. Ct. App.

We discussed this issue in Woodery v. Smith, 527 So.2d 389, 390 (La.App. 4th Cir.1988), we stated: One reason the statute requires an itemization is to prevent a lessor from arbitrarily withholding the deposit.