How cited: Presley v. U.S. Postal Service · Go Syfert

Presley v. U.S. Postal Service (2003)

green · 33 citation events across 5 courts. Showing the 9 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Treatment trajectory · 2003 → 2026 · click a year to view the case as of then
200320142026
Rule Authority · 2d Cir. · 2 citations in this opinion
Presley, 317 F.3d at 173.
Rule Authority · 2d Cir.
“A district court applying this standard ‘reviews the evidence presented at trial in support of the challenged damage award and compares the award to other New York cases in which evidence of similar injuries was presented.’ ” Id. (quoting Presley v. U.S. Postal Service, 317 F.3d 167, 173 (2d Cir.2003)).
Rule Authority · N.D.N.Y.
Non-Pecuniary Damages “[A] district court reviews the evidence presented at trial in support of the challenged damage award and compares the award to other New York cases in which evidence of similar injuries was presented.” Presley v. U.S. Postal Service, 317 F.3d 167, 173 (2d Cir.2003) (citing Gasperini v. Ctr. for Humanities, Inc., 518 U.S. 415, 437-39 , 116 S.Ct. 2211 , 135 L.Ed.2d 659 (1996)).
Rule Authority · N.D.N.Y.
“In applying this standard, a district court reviews the evidence presented at trial in support of the challenged damage award and compares the award to other New York cases in which evidence of similar injuries was presented.” Presley v. United States Postal Serv., 317 F.3d 167, 173 (2d Cir.2003) (citing Gasperini, 518 U.S. at 437-39 , 116 S.Ct. at 2224-25 ).
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Presley v. U.S. Postal Serv., 317 F.3d 167 , 173 (2d Cir.2003).
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See Presley v. U.S. Postal Serv., 317 F.3d 167 , 173 (2d Cir.2003).
Cited (see also) · 1st Cir. · signal: see also
The district judge denied the motion without comment, so we have two choices: remand for *78 clarification or address the issue head-on “if a reasonable basis supporting the order is made manifest on the record.” United States v. Podolsky, 158 F.3d 12, 16 (1st Cir.1998); see also generally Presley v. United States Postal Serv., 317 F.3d 167 , 173 (2d Cir.2003) (noting that “[w]hile a written explanation of a district court’s basis for denying [a new-trial motion] is certainl…
Cited (see also) · 1st Cir. · signal: see also
The district judge denied the motion without comment, so we have two choices: remand for clarification or address the issue head-on "if a reasonable basis supporting the order is made manifest on the record." United States v. Podolsky, 158 F.3d 12, 16 (1st Cir. 1998); see also generally Presley v. United States Postal Serv., 317 F.3d 167 , 173 (2d Cir. 2003) (noting that "[w]hile a written explanation of a district court's basis for denying [a new-trial motion] is certainly …
noting that "[w]hile a written explanation of a district court's basis for denying [a new-trial motion] is certainly preferable as an aid to appellate review, a separate written opinion is not necessarily required when a district court" rebuffs the motion
green Eisenberg v. Reid (2003)
Cited (see also) · 2d Cir. · signal: see also
Auth., 297 F.3d 142, 151 (2d Cir.2002) (quoting Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Prods., Inc., 530 U.S. 133, 150 , 120 S.Ct. 2097 , 147 L.Ed.2d 105 (2000)); see also Presley v. United States Postal Serv., 317 F.3d 167 , 178 (2d Cir.2003) (“[T]he ultimate decision as to all witnesses’ credibility and as to the persuasive force of their testimony is for the trier of fact, as is the ultimate determination of damages, subject only to the outer limits of reasonableness.”).