Cluster 786893
green
· 145 citation events
across 13 courts.
Showing the 50 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green
Phoenix Bond & Indemnity Company v. FDIC as Receiver for Washington Federal Bank for Savings (2020)
Bancorp. v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 201 (2d Cir. 2004) (“It is undisputed that, as a receiver, the FDIC owes a fiduciary duty to the Bank’s creditors.”).
“It is undisputed that, as a receiver, the FDIC owes a fiduciary duty to the Bank’s creditors.”
green
Suess v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (2011)
See Golden Pacific Bancorp. v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 201 (2d Cir. 2004) (“It is undisputed that, 7 as receiver, the FDIC owes a fiduciary duty to the [corporation’s] creditors and to [the corporation].”).
“It is undisputed that, 7 as receiver, the FDIC owes a fiduciary duty to the [corporation’s] creditors and to [the corporation].”
green
Alberty v. Hunter (2022)
Bancorp. v. F.D.I.C., 375 F.3d 196 (2d Cir. 2004) (“Though we recognize that a state court’s interpretation of federal law is not binding . . . we nevertheless find the reasoning of the [state] Court . . . persuasive, and adopt it here.”).
“Though we recognize that a state court’s interpretation of federal law is not binding . . . we nevertheless find the reasoning of the [state] Court . . . persuasive, and adopt it here.”
green
Speedfit LLC v. Woodway USA, Inc. (2020)
Dec. 26, 2002), aff'd, 375 F.3d 196 (2d Cir. 2004) (“In a claim for restitution, the plaintiff seeks the return or restoration of whatever the defendant gained due to the wrongful action.”) (quoting Dobbs, Law of Remedies, § 4.1(1), at 551 (2d ed. 1993)).
“In a claim for restitution, the plaintiff seeks the return or restoration of whatever the defendant gained due to the wrongful action.”
green
Sisti v. Fed. Hous. Fin. Agency (2018)
Bancorp v. FDIC , 375 F.3d 196 , 201 (2d Cir. 2004) ("It is undisputed that, as a receiver, the FDIC owes a fiduciary duty to the Bank's creditors ....").
"It is undisputed that, as a receiver, the FDIC owes a fiduciary duty to the Bank's creditors ...."
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir. 2004) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
green
Bank of America, N.A. v. City View Blinds of N.Y. Inc., Cosmopolitan Interior NY Corporation, JLM Decorating … (2025)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir. 2004) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
green
Scottsdale Insurance Company, OneTeam Restoration, Inc, Nautilus Realty Limited Partnership, and DNA Contract… (2025)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir. 2004) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
green
Greenlight Capital Inc. v. Fishback (2025)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir. 2004) (To defeat summary judgment, “[t]he non-moving party may not rely on mere conclusory allegations nor speculation, but instead must offer some hard evidence showing that its version of the events is not wholly fanciful.” (quoting D’Amico v. City of New York, 132 F.3d 145 , 149 (2d Cir. 1998))).
green
Darwin v. Newburgh Operations, LLC (2025)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir. 2004) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
green
In Re: Silicon Valley Bank (Cayman Islands Branch) (2025)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 201 (2d Cir. 2004) (The FDIC as receiver “has a 9 responsibility to marshal the assets of the bank and to distribute them to the bank’s creditors and shareholders.”); 12 U.S.C. § 1821 (d)(2) (The FDIC succeeds to “all rights, titles, powers, and privileges of the insured depository institution.”).
The FDIC as receiver “has a 9 responsibility to marshal the assets of the bank and to distribute them to the bank’s creditors and shareholders.”
green
Darwin v. Newburgh Operations, LLC (2025)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir. 2004) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
green
Maflahi v. United States (2024)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir. 2004) (quoting D'Amico v. City of New York, 132 F.3d 145 , 149 (2d Cir. 1998)).
quoting D'Amico v. City of New York, 132 F.3d 145 , 149 (2d Cir. 1998)
green
Pogil v. KPMG L.L.P. (2024)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir. 2004) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
green
Kuperman v. New York City Department of Education (2024)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir. 2004) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
green
Trombetta v. Novocin (2024)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir. 2004) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
green
Wilmington Trust, N.A. v. 5400 Raleigh Crabtree, LLC (2024)
Bancorp., 375 F.3d at 201.
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir. 2004) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
green
Golden Unicorn Enterprises, Inc. v. Audible, Inc. (2023)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir. 2004) (quoting Damico v. City of N.Y., 132 F.3d 145 , 149 (2d Cir. 1998)).
quoting Damico v. City of N.Y., 132 F.3d 145 , 149 (2d Cir. 1998)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir. 2004) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
green
Han v. Shang Noodle House, Inc. (2023)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir. 2004) (quoting D’Amico v. City of New York, 132 F.3d 145 , 149 (2d Cir. 1998)). “[W]here, notwithstanding issues of credibility [regarding the moving party’s evidence in support of summary judgment], [the non- moving party] has presented no evidence or inferences that would allow a reasonable mind to rule in [his] favor[,] . . . it may be said that the record as a whole points in one direction and the dispute is not genuine.” Jian …
quoting D’Amico v. City of New York, 132 F.3d 145 , 149 (2d Cir. 1998)
green
Conklin v. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (2023)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir. 2004) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
green
Liss v. Heritage Health & Housing, Inc. (2023)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir. 2004) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
green
Stefanovic v. Old Heidelberg Corp. (2022)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir. 2004) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir. 2004) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir. 2004) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
green
Bowman v. Receivables Performance Management LLC (2022)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir. 2004) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
green
Catholic United Investment Trust v. CoBank, ACB (2021)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir. 2004) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
green
Catholic United Investment Trust v. CoBank, ACB (2021)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir. 2004) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
green
Loma Deli Grocery Corp. v. United States (2021)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir. 2004))); Weinstock v. Columbia Univ., 224 F.3d 33, 41 (2d Cir. 2000) (noting that “unsupported allegations do not create a material issue of fact”).4 Finally, Plaintiffs assert that a report from an undercover investigator from the USDA’s Retailer Investigative Branch (“RIB”) provides “direct evidence” that trafficking was not 4 Rodriguez also attests that customers made successive purchases because they would purchase groceries, c…
green
Curry v. P&G Auditors and Consultants, LLC (2021)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir. 2004) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
green
The Gap Inc v. Ponte Gadea New York LLC (2021)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir. 2004) (citation omitted).
citation omitted
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir. 2004) (internal quotations omitted).
internal quotations omitted
green
Preville v. Pepsico Hourly Employees Retirement Plan (2014)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir.2004) (quoting D'Amico v. City of New York, 132 F.3d 145 , 149 (2d Cir.1998)).
green
Maimonides Medical Center v. United States (2014)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir.2004) (citing D'Amico v. City of New York, 132 F.3d 145 , 149 (2d Cir.1998)); Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e) (“Supporting and opposing affidavits shall be made on personal knowledge, shall set forth such facts as would be admissible in evidence, and shall show affirmatively that the affiant is competent to testify to the matters stated therein.”).
green
Karic v. Major Automotive Companies (2014)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir.2004) (citing D’Amico v. City of New York, 132 F.3d 145 , 149 (2d Cir.1998)); Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e) (“Supporting and opposing affidavits shall be made on personal knowledge, shall set forth such facts as would be admissible in evidence, and shall show affirmatively that the affiant is competent to testify to the matters stated therein.”).
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir.2004) (quoting D'Amico v. City of New York, 132 F.3d 145 , 149 (2d Cir.1998)).
green
Lewis v. Erie County Medical Center Corp. (2012)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir.2004) (quoting D’Amico v. City of New York, 132 F.3d 145 , 149 (2d Cir.1998)). 2.
green
Biberaj v. Pritchard Industries, Inc. (2012)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir.2004) (quoting D'Amico v. City of New York, 132 F.3d 145 , 149 (2d Cir.1998)).
green
Chanel, Inc. v. VERONIQUE IDEA CORP. (2011)
Bancorp, 375 F.3d at 200.
green
Morillo v. 1199 SEIU BENEFIT AND PENSION FUNDS (2011)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir.2004) (quoting D’Amico v. City of New York, 132 F.3d 145 , 149 (2d Cir.1998)).
green
Spinelli v. City of New York (2009)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir.2004).
green
Flagler Automotive, Inc. v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (2008)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir.2004) (citing D’Amico v. City of New York, 132 F.3d 145 , 149 (2d Cir.1998)); Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e) (“A supporting or opposing affidavit must be made on personal knowledge, set out facts that would be admissible in evidence, and show that the affiant is competent to testify on the matters stated.”).
green
Grancio v. De Vecchio (2008)
Bancorp. v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir.2004) (if the party moving for summary judgment shows an absence of evidence supporting the non-moving party’s claim, “the non-moving party must respond with ‘specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial’ ”) (quoting Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e)).
green
Eurospark Industries, Inc. v. Underwriters at Lloyds Subscribing to the Risk on Cover No. 97FA0071010A (2008)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir.2004) (citing D’Amico v. City of New York, 132 F.3d 145 , 149 (2d Cir.1998)); Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e) (“A supporting or opposing affidavit must be made on personal knowledge, set out facts that would be admissible in evidence, and show that the affiant is competent to testify on the matters stated.”).
green
Portside Growth & Opportunity Fund v. Gigabeam Corp. (2008)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir.2004).
green
Manko v. Deutsche Bank (2008)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir.2004).
green
Dauphin v. Chestnut Ridge Transportation, Inc. (2008)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir.2004) (quoting Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 249, 106 S.Ct. 2505 , 91 L.Ed.2d 202 (1986)).
green
Espada v. Schneider (2007)
Bancorp v. FDIC, 375 F.3d 196, 200 (2d Cir.2004).
green
Cunningham v. Insurance Co. of North America (2007)
See Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(e); Golden Pacific, 375 F.3d at 200; Stony Brook Marine Trans.