Cluster 796156

green · 90 citation events across 15 courts. Showing the 50 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 50

green RELIABLE PHARMACY v. ACTAVIS HOLDCO US, INC. (2022)

Quote Authority · E.D. Pa. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion

Soc’y, 457 U.S. 332, 348, n.18 (1982)); see also AT&T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 531 (3d Cir. 2006) (“Vertical restraints are generally not per se violations of the Sherman Act, even where a distributor and manufacturer also compete at the distribution level.”). 42 When weighing whether a restraint on trade violates the Sherman Act under the rule of reason, “the factfinder weighs all of the circumstances of a case in deciding whether a restrictive practice shou…

“Vertical restraints are generally not per se violations of the Sherman Act, even where a distributor and manufacturer also compete at the distribution level.”

green Firstcom, Inc. v. Qwest Corporation (2009)

Quote Authority · 8th Cir. · signal: see also · 4 citations in this opinion

Office, 524 U.S. at 222 ; see also JMC Telecom, 470 F.3d at 532 (“Here, JMC is claiming poor customer service in areas, such as customer support, that are not spelled out in the tariff.

“Here, JMC is claiming poor customer service in areas, such as customer support, that are not spelled out in the tariff. As such, JMC’s claims of poor service are barred by the filed rate doctrine.”

green Firstcom, Inc. v. Qwest Corp. (2009)

Quote Authority · 8th Cir. · signal: see also · 2 citations in this opinion

Office, 524 U.S. at 222 , 118 S.Ct. 1956 ; see also JMC Telecom, 470 F.3d at 532 (“Here, JMC is claiming poor customer service in areas, such as customer support, that are not spelled out in the tariff.

green Winn Dixie Stores v. Eastern Mushroom Marketing Cooperative Inc (2023)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

We cannot characterize this scheme as a single manufacturer imposing resale restrictions on a single distributor, see, e.g., Leegin, 551 U.S. at 883 ; AT & T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 530 (3d Cir. 2006), nor as a manufacturer reinforcing an existing downstream horizontal conspiracy through additional vertical restraints, Toledo, 530 F.3d at 211–12.

green United States v. Brent Brewbaker (2023)

Rule Authority · 4th Cir.

Consumer Prods., Inc., 129 F.3d 240 , 243–44 (2d Cir. 1997); Krehl v. Baskin-Robbins Ice Cream Co., 664 F.2d 1348, 1357 (9th Cir. 1982); Dimidowich v. Bell & Howell, 803 F.2d 1473, 1481 (9th Cir. 1986); AT&T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 531 (3d Cir. 2006); Abadir & Co. v. First Miss.

green Christopher Bainbridge v. US Bank NA as Trustee for the C BASS Mortgage Loan (2023)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

We review a grant of summary judgment de novo, “view[ing] the facts in a light most favorable to the nonmoving party” to determine whether “there are no genuine issues of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.” AT & T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 530 (3d Cir. 2006).

green Winn Dixie Stores v. Eastern Mushroom Marketing Cooperative Inc (2023)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

green Jamor Demby v. City of Camden (2023)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . 2 We exercise plenary review over the order dismissing the complaint for failure to state a claim, see AT&T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 530 (3d Cir. 2006), including the ruling that the complaint was filed beyond the statute of limitations, see Kach v. Hose, 589 F.3d 626, 633 (3d Cir. 2009).

green Roger Swartz v. The Board of Trustees at the University of PA (2022)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

We exercise plenary review over the District Court’s dismissal of the complaint for failure to state a claim, see AT&T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 530 (3d Cir. 2006), including the ruling that the complaint was filed beyond the statute of limitations, see Kach v. Hose, 589 F.3d 626, 633 (3d Cir. 2009).

green MAUDE v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA (2020)

Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.

Sept. 20, 2013) (citing AT & T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 534 (3d Cir. 2006)).

green Sean Clemmons v. United States (2019)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

AT&T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 530 (3d Cir. 2006).

green Mark Frazier v. City of Philadelphia (2018)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

But we agree with the District Court’s reasoning that Frazier’s complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.2 1 We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and exercise plenary review over the District Court’s dismissal of the complaint as frivolous, see Roman v. Jeffes, 904 F.2d 192, 194 (3d Cir. 1990), or for failure to state a claim, see AT&T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 530 (3d Cir. 2006).

green Victor Walthour v. John Herron (2017)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

AT&T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 530 (3d Cir. 2006).

green Justin Corliss v. Thomas Lynot (2017)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

AT&T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 530 (3d Cir. 2006).

green Gregory Kinnard, Jr. v. Michael George (2016)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

AT&T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 530 (3d Cir. 2006).

green Chetty Holdings Inc. v. NorthMarq Capital, LLC (2014)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

McTernan v. City of York, Pa., 577 F.3d 521, 526 (3d Cir.2009) (citing AT & T v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 530 (3d Cir.2006)).

green Maxwell v. United Services Automobile Ass'n (2014)

Rule Authority · Colo. Ct. App.

Co., 682 F.3d 229, 242 (8d Cir.2012). 184 Plaintiffs' assertion of this damage theory based on an underlying claim of consumer fraud does not change the foregoing analysis because "[tlhere is no fraud exception to the filed rate doctrine." AT & T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 535 (3d Cir.2006); see also Horwitz ex rel.

green Holy Ghost Carpatho-Russian Greek Catholic (Orthodox) Church v. Church Mutual Insurance (2012)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

“When considering an appeal from a dismissal of a complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), we accept as true all of the allegations in the complaint and all reasonable inferences that can be drawn from them and view them in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.” AT & T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 530 (3d Cir.2006).

green McCray v. Fidelity National Title Insurance (2012)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

With regard to Appellants' "hidden costs” argument, it is well established that "there is no fraud exception to the filed rate doctrine.” AT & T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 535 (3d Cir.2006).

green O'Brien v. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. (2012)

Rule Authority · Kan.

See Leegin, 551 U.S. at 893 (vertical price-fixing subject to rule of reason analysis); AT&T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 531 (3d Cir. 2006) (dual-distribution treated like vertical price-fixing); EEC v. Toshiba America Consumer Products, Inc., 129 F.3d 240, 243 (2d Cir. 1997) (same); Smalley & Co. v. Emerson & Cuming, Inc., 13 F.3d 366, 368 (10th Cir. 1993) (same); Illinois Corporate Travel v. American Airlines, 889 F.2d 751, 753 (7th Cir. 1989) (same); Internat…

dual-distribution treated like vertical price-fixing

green Karen Malleus v. John George (2011)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

AT & T v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 530 (3d Cir.2006).

green Coll v. First American Title Insurance (2011)

Rule Authority · 10th Cir.

Inc. and holding "filed rate" doctrine barred claim alleging cable company fraudulently recovered double fees as part of rate filed with and approved by local regulating authority; *889 noting that the "filed rate” doctrine applies regardless of the fact that the “claim involves allegations of fraud”); Wah Chang v. Duke Energy Trading & Mktg., LLC, 507 F.3d 1222, 1224-27 (9th Cir.2007) (applying "filed rate” doctrine to bar claim alleging rate approved by agency was too high…

green Clark v. Prudential Insurance Co. of America (2010)

Rule Authority · D.N.J. · 3 citations in this opinion

LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 535 (3d Cir.2006).

green Michigan Electric Transmission Co. v. Midland Cogeneration Venture, Ltd. Partnership (2010)

Rule Authority · E.D. Mich.

It must take the rates as it finds them, and here, FERC found them unfiled.”); AT & T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 532 (3d Cir.2006) (refusing to enforce a discount rate to the defendant because the contract was never filed with the FCC).

green In Re Insurance Brokerage Antitrust Litigation (2010)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

E.g., AT & T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 531 (3d Cir.2006); see also Texaco Inc. v. Dagher, 547 U.S. 1 , 7 n. 2, 126 S.Ct. 1276 , 164 L.Ed.2d 1 (2006) (declining to conduct a rule of reason analysis where plaintiffs “ha[d] not put forth a rule of reason claim”).

green Curtis Dukes v. Lancer Insurance Co (2010)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

We exercise plenary review over the District Court’s decision to dismiss Dukes’s claims, see AT & T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 530 (3d Cir.2006), and review the courtfs denial of his motion filed pursuant to Rule 60(a) and (b) for abuse of discretion.

green In Re Title Insurance Antitrust Cases (2010)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ohio

Corp., 838 F.2d 1445, 1482 (6th Cir.1988) (holding that “under Keogh ... all rate-related claims made by plaintiffs, whether state or federal, must be dismissed.”); AT & T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 535 (3d Cir.2006) (state law claims for fraud and negligent misrepresentation barred by filed rate doctrine *888 where court would be forced to determine what reasonable rate would be to assess damages); In re Mirant Corp., 378 F.3d 511, 518 (5th Cir.2004) (under fi…

green Grier v. Klem (2010)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

AT & T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 530 (3d Cir.2006).

green Alston v. Countrywide Financial Corp. (2009)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

“The classic example of the preemptive power of the doctrine occurs when a customer makes a claim for a rate that was not filed ... - such claims are barred.” AT & T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 532 (3d Cir.2006).

green Caprio v. Peters (2009)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

AT & T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 530 (3d Cir.2006). .

green Caprio v. Peters (2009)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

AT & T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 530 (3d Cir.2006). .

green Nunez v. Pachman (2009)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

AT & T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 530 (3d Cir.2006), cert. denied, 551 U.S. 1103 , 127 S.Ct. 2913 , 168 L.Ed.2d 243 (2007).

green McTernan v. City of York, Penn. (2009)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

AT & T v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 530 (3d Cir.2006).

green In Re Pennsylvania Title Insurance Antitrust Litigation (2009)

Rule Authority · E.D. Pa.

As defendants correctly point out, "there is no fraud exception to the filed rate doctrine.” AT & T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 535 (3d Cir.2006), cert. denied, 551 U.S. 1103 , 127 S.Ct. 2913 , 168 L.Ed.2d 243 (2007); see also Square D, 476 U.S. at 412-13, 417 , 106 S.Ct. 1922 (holding that the filed rate doctrine applies even where defendants’ filed rate arises essentially out of fraud).

green McCray v. FIDELITY NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY (2009)

Rule Authority · D. Del.

AT & T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 535 (3d Cir.2006).

green Conopco, Inc. v. United States (2009)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

Summary judgment is appropriate only if, after drawing all reasonable inferences from the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmovant, AT & T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 530 (3d Cir.2006), “the pleadings, the discovery and disclosure materials on file, and any affidavits show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law,” Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c).

green McTernan v. York (2009)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

AT&T v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 530 (3d Cir. 2006).

green Snell v. CITY OF YORK, PENNSYLVANIA (2009)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

AT & T v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 530 (3d Cir.2006).

green McTernan v. City of York, Pa. (2009)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

AT & T v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 530 (3d Cir.2006).

green Snell v. York (2009)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

AT&T v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 530 (3d Cir. 2006).

green Just New Homes, Inc. v. Beazer Homes (2008)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

AT & T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 530 (3d Cir. *933 2006).

green Trane U.S. Inc. v. Meehan (2008)

Rule Authority · N.D. Ohio · 2 citations in this opinion

AT & T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 531 (3d Cir.2006).

green Henkel Corp. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. (2008)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

AT & T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLQ 470 F.3d 525, 530 (3d Cir.2006).

green Iwanejko v. Cohen & Grigsby, P.C. (2007)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

AT & T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 530 (3d Cir.2006).

green O'Callaghan v. Atty Gen NJ (2007)

Rule Authority · 3rd Cir.

See Marran v. Marran, 376 F.3d 143, 149 (3d Cir.2004); AT & T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 529 (3d Cir.2006).

green Cluster 2162

Rule Authority

AT & T v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 530 (3d Cir.2006).

green Edward Leo v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC of Del (2020)

Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see

See 470 F.3d 525, 531-32, 534-35 (3d Cir. 2006).

green Chita Aliperio v. Bank of America NA (2019)

Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see

See AT&T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 530 (3d Cir. 2006).

green Edward Torres v. Sara Davis (2012)

Cited · 3rd Cir. · signal: see

See AT & T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 530 (3d Cir.2006).

green PSKS, Inc. v. Leegin Creative Leather Products, Inc. (2010)

Cited · 5th Cir. · signal: see

See AT&T Corp. v. JMC Telecom, LLC, 470 F.3d 525, 531 (3d Cir.2006); Electronics Commc’ns Corp. v. Toshiba Am.