Cluster 8211528
green
· 5 citation events
across 4 courts.
Showing the 4 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green
Stevenson v. Berryhill (2020)
See Likes v. Callahan, 112 F.3d 189, 191 (5th Cir. 1997); Agnese v. Chafer, 934 F. Supp. 59, 62 (E.D.N.Y. 1996); Thomas v. Chater, 933 F. Supp. 1271, 1271 (D.V.I.), amended, 945 F. Supp. 104 (D.V.I. 1996).
green
Wright v. Berryhill (2017)
The first one cited, Thomas v. Chater, 933 F.Supp. 1271, 1277 (D.V.I.1996), states the relevant point of law: “medical reports containing observations made after the period of-disability can be relevant in assessing a claimant’s disability only insofar as such reports relate to or provide evidence of claimant’s pre-expiration condition.” The ALJ was explicit that he viewed the lack of treatment in the post-disability time frame as evidence that the possible triggering event …
green
Busch v. Kijakazi (2021)
See Thomas v. Chater, 933 F.Supp. 1271, 1274 (D.V.I. 1996), order amended, 945 F.Supp. 104 (D.V.I. 1996) (“Evidence of an impairment that became disabling only after the date of being last insured cannot be the basis for the determination of entitlement for disability benefits, even though the impairment may have existed before a claimant’s insured status expired.”) (emphasis added) (citing Arnone v. Bowen, 882 F.2d 34, 38 (2nd Cir. 1989)).
green
Velazquez v. Commissioner of Social Security (2022)
See, e.g., Busch, 2021 WL 5771228 , at *2 (citing Thomas v. Chater, 933 F. Supp. 1271, 1274 (D.V.I. 1996), order amended, 945 F. Supp. 104 (D.V.I. 1996) (“Evidence of an impairment that became disabling only after the date of being last insured cannot be the basis for the determination of entitlement for disability benefits, even though the impairment may have existed before a claimant's insured status expired.”) (emphasis added))); Holstrom, 2020 WL 3989349 , at *3 (“a diag…