Cluster 8523539
green
· 14 citation events
across 9 courts.
Showing the 12 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green
Delpidio v. Fiorillo (2023)
In re Fiorillo, 494 B.R. 119, 129 (Bankr.
“Mr. Fiorillo [is] a commercial real estate developer”
green
BSI 254 Westfield, LLC v. Fiorillo (2023)
In re Fiorillo, 494 B.R. 119, 129 (Bankr.
“Mr. Fiorillo [is] a commercial real estate developer”
Specialists, Inc. v. Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP, 462 B.R. 457, 463 (S.D.N.Y. 2011) (finding that proceedings that would “augment for the benefit of all creditors” were “related to” the debt- or’s estate for subject matter jurisdiction purposes under § 1334(b).); Goldsmith v. Massad (In re Fiorillo), 494 B.R. 119, 144 (Bankr.
“[A]s actions with the potential to augment the bankruptcy estates, the adversary proceedings fall within the court’s related-to jurisdiction.”
green
In re: David T. Marrett, Sandy J. Marrett v. Aroostook County Federal Savings & Loan, Zurich North American I… (2026)
“Because the Rooker-Feldman doctrine directly affects a court’s subject-matter jurisdiction, it is appropriate to begin by discussing whether and to what claims the doctrine applies here.” Goldsmith v. Massad (In re Fiorillo), 494 B.R. 119, 140 (Bankr.
Nor is the Plan Administrator pursuing this action as the assignee of claims held by non-debtor, third parties as discussed in Goldsmith v. Massad (In re Fiorillo), 494 B.R. 119, 152 (Bankr.D.
addressing inapplicability of §108(a) to bankruptcy trustees’ assertion of claims as assignees where the assignors were not debtors
green
Disen v. Bayview Loan Servicing, LLC (2022)
In re Mullarkey, 536 F.3d 215, 220-21 (3d Cir. 2008) (“a bankruptcy court must make an initial determination that the claims before it fall within the purview of section 157 of Title 28”); In re Recticel Foam Corp., 859 F. 2d 1000, 1002 (1st Cir. 1988) (“a court has an obligation to inquire sua sponte into its subject matter jurisdiction, and to proceed no further if such jurisdiction is wanting”); Goldsmith v. Massad (In re Fiorillo), 494 B.R. 119, 142 (Bankr.
bankruptcy courts are “obligated to determine whether and to what extent [they] have jurisdiction to hear and determine all counts of the complaints”
green
Ragge v. Webster Bank, National Ass'n (In re Ragge) (2017)
Goldsmith v. Massad (In re Fiorillo), 494 B.R. 119, 140 (Bankr.
Bankr.P. 7012(b); In re Recticel Foam Corp., 859 F.2d 1000, 1002 (1st Cir.1988) (“a court has an obligation to inquire sua sponte into its subject matter jurisdiction, and to proceed no further if such jurisdiction is wanting”); Goldsmith v. Massad (In re Fiorillo), 494 B.R. 119, 142 (Bankr.D.Ma.2013) (bankruptcy courts are “obligated to determine whether and to what extent [they] have jurisdiction to hear and determine all counts of the complaints.”); Feliciano v. DuBois, 8…
green
Blackstone Investment Partners v. Santo Arcuri (2021)
See id.
green
In Re: Jose Ramon Quinones-Coll (2021)
See In re Fiorillo, 494 B.R. 119, 144 , (Bankr.
district court denied a motion to withdraw the reference filed under the argument that the claims “involve[d] RICO counts, and because the parties have requested a jury trial and do not consent to its being conducted in the bankruptcy court.” Id. at n.48
green
Butler v. Bateman (2019)
See Goldsmith, 494 B.R. at 142 .
green
Decoulos v. Town of Aquinnah (2018)
See In re Fiorillo, 494 B.R. 119, 142 (Bankr.
Lance exception applied to the extent that bankruptcy trustee sought damages on behalf of state-court loser because trustee “stands in the shoes of the state court losing party”