Cluster 8523975
green
· 23 citation events
across 5 courts.
Showing the 12 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green
Celsius Network Limited v. Tether Limited (2025)
In other words, “a party in interest must have a financial or legal stake in the outcome of the particular matter.” Old Carco, 500 B.R. at 691 (citation omitted). b.
citation omitted
green
Prime Capital Ventures, LLC (2025)
(Involuntary Prime, Case No. 23-11302, ECF No. 173 at 14; DIP Prime, Case No. 24-11029, ECF No. 43 at 14) (quoting In re Old Carco LLC, 500 B.R. 683, 690 (Bankr.
green
Prime Capital Ventures, LLC (2025)
(Involuntary Prime, Case No. 23-11302, ECF No. 173 at 14; DIP Prime, Case No. 24-11029, ECF No. 43 at 14) (quoting In re Old Carco LLC, 500 B.R. 683, 690 (Bankr.
green
Celsius Network LLC (2024)
“Generally, a party in interest must have a financial or legal stake in the outcome of the particular matter.” Old Carco, 500 B.R. at 691 (citation omitted).
citation omitted
green
In Re: Mosdos Chofetz Chaim Inc. (2023)
In re Old Carco LLC, 500 B.R. 683, 690 (Bankr.
green
Michael Maidan (2023)
“Prudential limitations on standing are especially important in bankruptcy proceedings which often involve numerous parties who may seek to assert the rights of third-parties for their own benefit.” In re Old Carco LLC, 500 B.R. 683, 691 (Bankr.
green
The Diocese of Camden, New Jersey (2022)
In re Old Careo LLC, 500 B.R. 683, 690 (Bankr.
citing Motor Vehicle Cas. Co. v. Thorpe Insulation Co. (In re Thorpe Insulation Co.), 677 F.3d 869, 884 (9th Cir. 2012)
green
Ditech Holding Corporation (2021)
Corp. v. Equifax, Inc., 583 F.3d 103, 108 (2d Cir. 2009) (“In the context of a contract dispute, only parties to the contract and intended third-party beneficiaries of the contract have prudential standing to appear and enforce agreements.”); see also Hillside Metro Assoc., LLC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 747 F.3d 44, 48-49 (2d Cir. 2014) (plaintiff who is neither a party to nor third-party beneficiary of a contract does not have prudential standing); In re Old Carco, LLC,…
noting that under general contract rules, a non-party to a contract who is not an intended beneficiary cannot enforce the contract or recover for its breach
green
In Re: Corporate Resource Services, Inc. (2020)
In re Old Carco LLC, 500 B.R. 683, 690 (Bankr.
green
Corporate Resource Services, Inc. (2019)
See id. (explaining that “[a] non-party to a contract governed by New York law lacks standing” in a contract proceeding “in the absence of terms that clearly evidence an intent to permit” such standing) (internal citation omitted); see also Hillside Metro Assoc., LLC v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., 747 F.3d 44 , 48–49 (2d Cir. 2014) (applying the third-party beneficiary theory, and holding that a plaintiff suing for breach of a lease, who is “neither a party nor a third-party …
holding that a non-party to a stipulation lacked prudential standing to assert claims thereunder and noting that “[u]nder general contract rules, a non-party to a contract who is not an intended beneficiary cannot enforce the contract or recover for its breach”
In re Old Carco LLC, 500 B.R. 683, 691-92 (Bankr.S.D.N.Y.2013) (“TRW Decision”).
green
MATTER OF CERTAIN CLAIMS AND NOTICING AGENTS' (2022)
Feb. 13, 2015); accord In re Old Carco LLC, 500 B.R. 683, 690 (Bankr.