How cited: Cluster 8712476 · Go Syfert

Cluster 8712476

green · 12 citation events across 4 courts. Showing the 8 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Rule Authority · D. Nev.
Tai-Si Kim 26 v. Kearney, 838 F.Supp.2d 1077, 1095 (D.
Rule Authority · D. Nev.
But other courts have found other activities lacking 10 in the inherent danger required to state a claim for concert of action, such as real estate 11 transactions, see Tai-Si Kim v. Kearney, 838 F. Supp. 2d 1077, 1092 (D.
Rule Authority · D. Nev.
A party has a duty to disclose only in a fiduciary relationship 10 or a special relationship “where the parties are involved in a transaction and the defendant 11 knows material facts which are not accessible to the plaintiff . . . [or] where one party 12 imposes confidence in the other because of that person's position, and the other party 13 knows of this confidence.” Tai-Si Kim v. Kearney, 838 F. Supp. 2d 1077, 1099-100 (D. 14 Nev. 2012 ) (citing to Mackintosh v. Jack Mat…
Rule Authority · D. Nev.
To the extent Plaintiff alleges that “Global and Gardner were under a duty to 16 disclose such facts unknown to plaintiff,” the allegation is conclusory and insufficient. 17 (ECF No. 18 at 8.) Such a duty may only arise in a fiduciary relationship or a special 18 relationship “where the parties are involved in a transaction and the defendant knows 19 material facts which are not accessible to the plaintiff . . . [or] where one party imposes 20 confidence in the other because…
green Alexander v. Falk (2019)
Rule Authority · D. Nev.
Civil Conspiracy/Concert of Action—Thirteenth Claim 22 To establish a claim for civil conspiracy under Nevada law, a plaintiff “must show a 23 combination of two or more persons who, by some concerted action[--explicit or tacit 24 agreement--], intend to accomplish some unlawful objective for the purpose of harming 25 another which results in damage.” Tai-Si Kim v. Kearney, 838 F. Supp. 2d 1077, 1093 (D. 26 Nev. 2012 ) (internal quotations and citations omitted).
Rule Authority · Nev.
Id. at 1089 (emphasis added).
emphasis added
green Lahn v. Vaisbort (2016)
Cited (see also) · Or. Ct. App. · signal: compare
Compare Wallenbrock, 313 F3d at 539 (observing that the promissory notes were broadly held, including over 1,000 investors in at least 25 states), with Tai-Si Kim v. Kearney, 838 F Supp 2d 1077, 1095 (D Nev 2012) (observing that the note was not offered to or broadly sold to the public).
observing that the note was not offered to or broadly sold to the public
Cited (see also) · 3rd Cir. · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Tai-Si Kim v. Kearney, 838 F. Supp. 2d 1077, 1090 (D.Nev. 2012).