How cited: Cluster 8717680 · Go Syfert

Cluster 8717680

green · 8 citation events across 1 courts. Showing the 6 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green Sadakhom v. Saul (2021)
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
(R. 24, 25-28); Adams v. Astrue, 880 F. Supp. 2d 895, 907 (N.D.
the ALJ properly considered the claimant’s daily activities, which included performing household chores and using public transportation, in determining the extent of Claimant's alleged symptoms
green Arteaga v. Saul (2020)
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
(R. 21- 22); Adams v. Astrue, 880 F. Supp. 2d 895, 907 (N.D.
the ALJ properly considered the claimant’s daily activities, which included performing household chores and using public transportation, in determining the extent of Claimant’s alleged symptoms
green Robinson v. Saul (2019)
Rule Authority · N.D. Ill.
Adams v. Astrue, 880 F.Supp.2d 895, 906 (N.D.Ill. 2012) (addressing a credibility and neither the ALJ nor the Commissioner has provided any explanation of what could support the ALJ’s statement.
green Firca v. Bisignano (2025)
Cited · N.D. Ill. · signal: see
See id.
green Ellis v. Saul (2021)
Cited · N.D. Ill. · signal: see
See. e.g, Adams v. Astrue, 880 F. Supp. 2d 895, 907 (N.D.
the ALJ properly considered the claimant’s daily activities, which included performing household chores and using public transportation, in determining the extent of Claimant’s alleged symptoms
green Shelton v. Saul (2021)
Cited · N.D. Ill. · signal: see
See. e.g, Adams v. Astrue, 880 F. Supp. 2d 895, 907 (N.D.
the ALJ properly considered the claimant’s daily activities, which included performing household chores and using public transportation, in determining the extent of Claimant's alleged symptoms