Cluster 8725432
green
· 19 citation events
across 4 courts.
Showing the 18 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green
Cameron v. Berryhill (2022)
See Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp. 2d 646, 657 (S.D.
“The law and regulations governing the determination of disability are the same for both programs.”
green
Latiolais v. Berryhill (2021)
Would that impact the jobs you identified at the light level?” to which the ALJ responded “Yes it would.” R. 60. recognized by ALJ); Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp. 2d 646, 662 (S.D.
“ALJ is not required to incorporate limitations into hypothetical questions presented to vocational expert in social security disability case, if ALJ did not find alleged limitations to be supported in the record.”
“The law and regulations governing the determination of disability are the same for both programs.” Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp. 2d 646, 657 (S.D.
citing Greenspan v. Shalala, 38 F.3d 232, 236 (5th Cir. 1994)
“The law and regulations governing the determination of disability are the same for both programs.” Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp. 2d 646, 657 (S.D.
citing Greenspan v. Shalala, 38 F.3d 232, 236 (5th Cir. 1994)
green
Goad v. Commissioner of Social Security (2024)
“The law and regulations governing the determination of disability are the same for both programs.” Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp. 2d 646, 657 (S.D.
citing Greenspan v. Shalala, 38 F.3d 232, 236 (5th Cir. 1994)
However, “[a]n ALJ is not required to incorporate limitations into the hypothetical questions presented to the VE, if the ALJ did not find the alleged limitations to be supported in the record.” Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp. 2d 646, 662 (S.D.
“The law and regulations governing the determination of disability are the same for both programs.” Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp. 2d 646, 657 (S.D.
citing Greenspan v. Shalala, 38 F.3d 232, 236 (5th Cir. 1994)
green
Vanderzwet v. Kijakazi (2024)
“The law and regulations governing the determination of disability are the same for both programs.” Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp. 2d 646, 657 (S.D.
citing Greenspan v. Shalala, 38 F.3d 232, 236 (5th Cir. 1994)
“The law and regulations governing the determination of disability are the same for both programs.” Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp. 2d 646, 657 (S.D.
citing Greenspan v. Shalala, 38 F.3d 232, 236 (5th Cir. 1994)
green
Kerns v. Kijakazi (2024)
“The law and regulations governing the determination of disability are the same for both programs.” Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp. 2d 646, 657 (S.D.
citing Greenspan v. Shalala, 38 F.3d 232, 236 (5th Cir. 1994)
green
Hina v. Commissioner of Social Security (2024)
“The law and regulations governing the determination of disability are the same for both programs.” Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp. 2d 646, 657 (S.D.
citing Greenspan v. Shalala, 38 F.3d 232, 236 (5th Cir. 1994)
green
Homberg v. Commissioner of Social Security (2024)
“The law and regulations governing the determination of disability are the same for both programs.” Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp. 2d 646, 657 (S.D.
citing Greenspan v. Shalala, 38 F.3d 232, 236 (5th Cir. 1994)
green
Garrett v. Commissioner Of Social Security (2023)
“The law and regulations governing the determination of disability are the same for both programs.” Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp. 2d 646, 657 (S.D.
citing Greenspan v. Shalala, 38 F.3d 232, 236 (5th Cir. 1994)
green
Cummock v. Saul (2022)
Tex. Apr. 20, 2022) (finding plaintiff pointed “to no evidence that he requested a consultative examination at any point during the claims process or any expert testimony at the administrative hearing,” and the RFC was based on substantial evidence without those medical opinions); Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp. 2d 646, 661 (S.D.
in similar circumstances, finding that “there is nothing to indicate that an additional consultative examination was required”
green
Maricle v. Commissioner of Social Security (2022)
A treating source’s “opinion on the nature and severity of a claimant’s impairment should receive ‘controlling weight’ when it is well-supported by medically acceptable clinical and laboratory diagnostic techniques and is not inconsistent with the other substantial evidence in the case record.” Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp.2d 646, 658 (S.D.
cleaned up
green
Anderson v. Saul (2021)
See Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp. 2d 646, 663 (S.D.
green
Flynn v. Saul (2020)
See Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp. 2d 646, 663 (S.D.
green
Robberts v. Commissioner of Social Security (2019)
Indeed, post-Cunningham, the Sixth Circuit directly held (as stated and described above), in a published decision: “To establish that work exists in the national economy, the ALJ can rely on evidence such as the testimony of a VE and the DOT.” Kyle, 609 F.3d at 855 (labeling the DOT an enduring source of “reliable job information”) (emphasis added); see also, e.g., Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp. 2d 646 , 662 n.6 (S.D.
same, rejecting argument that the DOT is “‘obsolete’ and not reliable”