How cited: Cluster 8725432 · Go Syfert

Cluster 8725432

green · 19 citation events across 4 courts. Showing the 18 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
green Cameron v. Berryhill (2022)
Quote Authority · D.D.C. · signal: see
See Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp. 2d 646, 657 (S.D.
“The law and regulations governing the determination of disability are the same for both programs.”
green Latiolais v. Berryhill (2021)
Quote Authority · S.D. Tex.
Would that impact the jobs you identified at the light level?” to which the ALJ responded “Yes it would.” R. 60. recognized by ALJ); Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp. 2d 646, 662 (S.D.
“ALJ is not required to incorporate limitations into hypothetical questions presented to vocational expert in social security disability case, if ALJ did not find alleged limitations to be supported in the record.”
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
“The law and regulations governing the determination of disability are the same for both programs.” Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp. 2d 646, 657 (S.D.
citing Greenspan v. Shalala, 38 F.3d 232, 236 (5th Cir. 1994)
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
“The law and regulations governing the determination of disability are the same for both programs.” Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp. 2d 646, 657 (S.D.
citing Greenspan v. Shalala, 38 F.3d 232, 236 (5th Cir. 1994)
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
“The law and regulations governing the determination of disability are the same for both programs.” Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp. 2d 646, 657 (S.D.
citing Greenspan v. Shalala, 38 F.3d 232, 236 (5th Cir. 1994)
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
However, “[a]n ALJ is not required to incorporate limitations into the hypothetical questions presented to the VE, if the ALJ did not find the alleged limitations to be supported in the record.” Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp. 2d 646, 662 (S.D.
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
“The law and regulations governing the determination of disability are the same for both programs.” Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp. 2d 646, 657 (S.D.
citing Greenspan v. Shalala, 38 F.3d 232, 236 (5th Cir. 1994)
green Vanderzwet v. Kijakazi (2024)
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
“The law and regulations governing the determination of disability are the same for both programs.” Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp. 2d 646, 657 (S.D.
citing Greenspan v. Shalala, 38 F.3d 232, 236 (5th Cir. 1994)
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
“The law and regulations governing the determination of disability are the same for both programs.” Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp. 2d 646, 657 (S.D.
citing Greenspan v. Shalala, 38 F.3d 232, 236 (5th Cir. 1994)
green Kerns v. Kijakazi (2024)
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
“The law and regulations governing the determination of disability are the same for both programs.” Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp. 2d 646, 657 (S.D.
citing Greenspan v. Shalala, 38 F.3d 232, 236 (5th Cir. 1994)
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
“The law and regulations governing the determination of disability are the same for both programs.” Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp. 2d 646, 657 (S.D.
citing Greenspan v. Shalala, 38 F.3d 232, 236 (5th Cir. 1994)
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
“The law and regulations governing the determination of disability are the same for both programs.” Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp. 2d 646, 657 (S.D.
citing Greenspan v. Shalala, 38 F.3d 232, 236 (5th Cir. 1994)
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
“The law and regulations governing the determination of disability are the same for both programs.” Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp. 2d 646, 657 (S.D.
citing Greenspan v. Shalala, 38 F.3d 232, 236 (5th Cir. 1994)
green Cummock v. Saul (2022)
Rule Authority · S.D. Tex.
Tex. Apr. 20, 2022) (finding plaintiff pointed “to no evidence that he requested a consultative examination at any point during the claims process or any expert testimony at the administrative hearing,” and the RFC was based on substantial evidence without those medical opinions); Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp. 2d 646, 661 (S.D.
in similar circumstances, finding that “there is nothing to indicate that an additional consultative examination was required”
Rule Authority · N.D. Miss.
A treating source’s “opinion on the nature and severity of a claimant’s impairment should receive ‘controlling weight’ when it is well-supported by medically acceptable clinical and laboratory diagnostic techniques and is not inconsistent with the other substantial evidence in the case record.” Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp.2d 646, 658 (S.D.
cleaned up
green Anderson v. Saul (2021)
Cited · S.D. Tex. · signal: see
See Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp. 2d 646, 663 (S.D.
green Flynn v. Saul (2020)
Cited · S.D. Tex. · signal: see
See Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp. 2d 646, 663 (S.D.
Cited (see also) · S.D. Ohio · signal: see also
Indeed, post-Cunningham, the Sixth Circuit directly held (as stated and described above), in a published decision: “To establish that work exists in the national economy, the ALJ can rely on evidence such as the testimony of a VE and the DOT.” Kyle, 609 F.3d at 855 (labeling the DOT an enduring source of “reliable job information”) (emphasis added); see also, e.g., Roberts v. Colvin, 946 F. Supp. 2d 646 , 662 n.6 (S.D.
same, rejecting argument that the DOT is “‘obsolete’ and not reliable”