United States v. Yazzie (2014)
green
· 4 citation events
across 4 courts.
Showing the 4 strongest citers on record
(one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Sort:
By significance ·
Most recent
Jan.10, 2005), donde se resolvió que el Departamento de Bomberos de una ciudad no es un covered entity bajo HIPAA; United States v. Mathis, 377 F.Supp.2d 640, 645 (M.D.Tenn.2005) donde se resolvió que las agencias de orden público (law enforcement agency) no son covered entity bajo HIPAA; U.S. v. Yazzie, 998 F.Supp.2d 1044, 1116 (D.N.M., 2014) donde se resolvió que el FBI no es un covered entity bajo HIPAA y Fox v. City of Alexandria, 971 So.2d 468, 470 , 2007- 810, 3 (La.Ap…
green
State v. Pedro. (2021)
Cf. United States v. Yazzie, 998 F. Supp. 2d 1044, 1119-1120 (D.N.M. 2014) (finding that government would be prejudiced by plea withdrawal in case where there were affidavits from alleged victims indicating their desire to recant or change their testimony).
finding that government would be prejudiced by plea withdrawal in case where there were affidavits from alleged victims indicating their desire to recant or change their testimony
green
Givens v. Department of Justice Services (2020)
See, e.g., United States v. Yazzie, 998 F. Supp. 2d 1044, 1116 (D.N.M. 2014) (“HIPAA ‘provides for criminal and civil penalties against entities that fail to comply with its provisions,’ but the individual sufficient to meet the requirements of paragraph (e)(1)(iii) of this section or to seek a qualified protective order sufficient to meet the requirements of paragraph (e)(1)(v) of this section. 7 suppressing medical records does not appear to be an appropriate remedy for a …
“HIPAA ‘provides for criminal and civil penalties against entities that fail to comply with its provisions,’ but the individual sufficient to meet the requirements of paragraph (e)(1)(iii
green
United States v. Blattner (2016)
See Yazzie v. Mitchell, 998 F.Supp.2d 1044, 1064-65 (D.N.M.2014)(Browning, J.).