Cluster 8775226

green · 27 citation events across 11 courts. Showing the 10 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).

All Green 10

green Rikard v. U.S. Auto Protection, LLC (2012)

Quote Authority · E.D. Mo. · 2 citations in this opinion

Indeed, Plaintiffs have shown that “the types of activities subject to compensation are uniform among the employees without regard to their individual work experiences.” Id. (“Each case for each class member is about the defendants’ common pay system for activities by ... employees!.]”).

“Each case for each class member is about the defendants’ common pay system for activities by ... employees!.]”

green Lewis v. MHM Health Professionals, Inc. (2023)

Rule Authority · E.D. Mo.

Beef, Inc., 266 F.R.D. 275, 283 (D.

green Deutsch v. My Pillow, Inc. (2023)

Rule Authority · D. Minnesota

Minn. 1995)). “[W]here the numerosity question is a close one, a balance should be struck in favor of a finding of numerosity, since the court has the option to decertify pursuant to Rule 23(c)(1).” Cortez v. Nebraska Beef, Inc., 266 F.R.D. 275, 289 (D.

quoting Evans v. U.S. Pipe & Foundry Co., 696 F.2d 925, 930 (11th Cir. 1983)

green Deutsch v. My Pillow, Inc. (2023)

Rule Authority · D. Minnesota

quoting Evans v. U.S. Pipe & Foundry Co., 696 F.2d 925, 930 (11th Cir. 1983)

green Ritke v. Schuessler (2022)

Rule Authority · D. Neb.

Beef, Inc., 266 F.R.D. 275, 286 (D.

green Custom Hair Designs by Sandy, LLC v. Central Payment Co., LLC (2020)

Rule Authority · D. Neb.

“Although mere allegations of numerosity are insufficient to meet this prerequisite, a plaintiff need not show the precise number of members in the class . . . .” Cortez v. Nebraska Beef, Inc., 266 F.R.D. 275, 289 (D.

quoting Evans v. U.S. Pipe & Foundry Co., 696 F.2d 925, 930 (11th Cir. 1983)

green Tegtmeier v. PJ Iowa, L.C. (2016)

Rule Authority · S.D. Iowa · 2 citations in this opinion

Mar. 7, 2011)); Cortez, 266 F.R.D. at 287 (same).

same

green Cromeans v. Morgan Keegan & Co. (2014)

Rule Authority · W.D. Mo.

Beef Inc., 266 F.R.D. 275, 289 (D.Neb.2010); and Foster v. Bechtel Power Corp., 89 F.R.D. 624, 626 (E.D.Ark.1981).

green McLaurin v. Prestage Foods, Inc. (2010)

Rule Authority · E.D.N.C. · 2 citations in this opinion

Beef, Inc., 266 F.R.D. 275, 287 (D.Neb.2010) (“It would ill serve the interests of convenience or judicial economy to re-litigate in state court the defendants’ pay practices.”); Guzman v. VLM, Inc., No. 07-CV-1126, 2008 WL 597186 , at *9 (E.D.N.Y.

green Harris v. Vector Marketing Corp. (2010)

Cited · N.D. Cal. · signal: see

See Cortez v. Nebraska Beef, Ltd., 266 F.R.D. 275, 294 (D.Neb.2010).