How cited: Cluster 8986950 · Go Syfert

Cluster 8986950

green · 97 citation events across 32 courts. Showing the 15 strongest citers on record (one row per citing case, strongest signal kept).
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Gray, 448 F.2d 164, 167-68 (9th Cir. 1971) cert. denied, 405 U.S. 926 (1972); cf. Lynch v. Overholser, 369 U.S. 705, 731 (1962).
Cited · 8th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Gray, 448 F.2d 164, 167-68 (9th Cir.1971) cert. denied, 405 U.S. 926 , 92 S.Ct. 974 , 30 L.Ed.2d 798 (1972); cf. Lynch v. Overholser, 369 U.S. 705, 731 , 82 S.Ct. 1063 , 8 L.Ed.2d 211 (1962).
Cited · 8th Cir. BAP · signal: see
See id.
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See United States v. Gray, 448 F.2d 164, 168 (9th Cir.1971) (where Congress employs a term in one place and excludes it in another, court should not imply it where excluded), cert. denied 405 U.S. 926 , 92 S.Ct. 974 , 30 L.Ed.2d 798 (1972); Pena-Cabanillas v. United States, 394 F.2d 785, 789-90 (9th Cir.1968) (court found no intent requirement because the relevant section omitted language of intent, and related sections contained such language); Commonwealth v. Koczwara, 397…
Cited · S.D.N.Y. · signal: see
See United States v. Trudo, 449 F.2d 649, 652-53 (2d Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 926 , 92 S.Ct. 975 , 30 L.Ed.2d 799 (1972) (dictum) (collecting cases); United States ex rel.
dictum
Cited · 10th Cir. · signal: see · 2 citations in this opinion
See United States v. Gray, 448 F.2d 164 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 926 , 92 S.Ct. 974 , 30 L.Ed.2d 798 (1972).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Faulkner, 447 F.2d 869, 872 (9th Cir.1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 926 , 92 S.Ct. 974 , 30 L.Ed.2d 798 (1972).
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
Posey v. United States, 416 F.2d 545, 551 (5th Cir. 1969), Cert. denied, 397 U.S. 946 , 90 S.Ct. 964 , 25 L.Ed.2d 127 (1970); See United States v. Trudo, 449 F.2d 649, 652-53 (2nd Cir. 1971), Cert. denied, 405 U.S. 926 , 92 S.Ct. 975 , 30 L.Ed.2d 799 (1972); United States v. Addonizio, 451 F.2d 49, 71 (3rd Cir. 1971), Cert. denied, 405 U.S. 936 , 92 S.Ct. 949 , 30 L.Ed.2d 812 (1972); United States v. Kershner, 432 F.2d 1066, 1071 (5th Cir. 1970); United States v. Fleming, 50…
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
Posey v. United States, 416 F.2d 545, 551 (5th Cir. 1969), cert. denied, 397 U.S. 946 , 90 S.Ct. 964 , 25 L.Ed.2d 127 (1970); see United States v. Trudo, 449 F.2d 649, 652-53 (2nd Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 926 , 92 S.Ct. 975 , 30 L.Ed.2d 799 (1972); United States v. Addonizio, 451 F.2d 49, 71 (3rd Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 936 , 92 S.Ct. 949 , 30 L.Ed.2d 812 (1972); United States v. Kershner, 432 F.2d 1066, 1071 (5th Cir. 1970); United States v. Fleming, 50…
Cited · 9th Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Faulkner, 447 F.2d 869, 872 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 926 , 92 S.Ct. 974 , 30 L.Ed.2d 798 (1972); United States v. Mendoza, 441 F.2d 1107, 1108 (9th Cir. 1971) (per curiam); United States v. Maurice, 416 F.2d 234, 237 (9th Cir. 1969).
per curiam
Cited · 1st Cir. · signal: see
See Williams v. Rogers, 449 F.2d 513, 518 (8th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 926 , 92 S.Ct. 976 , 30 L.Ed.2d 799 (1972); Kern v. Standard Oil Co., 228 F.2d 699, 701 (8th Cir. 1956); Walmac Co. v. Isaacs, 280 F.2d 108, 111 (1st Cir. 1955).
green State v. Brown (1978)
Cited · Iowa · signal: see
See United States v. Gray, 448 F.2d 164, 168 (9 Cir. 1971), cert. den., 405 U.S. 926 , 92 S.Ct. 974 , 30 L.Ed.2d 798 .
Cited · 2d Cir. · signal: see
See United States v. Trudo, 449 F.2d 649, 651-53 (2d Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 926 , 92 S.Ct. 975 , 30 L.Ed.2d 799 (1972).
Cited (see also) · cma · signal: see, e.g.
See, e.g., Williams v. Rogers, 449 F.2d 513 (8th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 926 , 92 S.Ct. 976 , 30 L.Ed.2d 799 (1972); United States ex rel.
Cited (see also) · 9th Cir. · signal: see also
See also United States v. Gray, 448 F.2d 164 (9th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 405 U.S. 926 , 92 S.Ct. 974 , 30 L.Ed.2d 798 *1226 (1972); 3 United States v. Gainey, 142 U.S.App.D.C. 262 , 440 F.2d 290 (1971). 4 On the basis of the teaching of the foregoing authorities, we conclude that the District Court exceeded its authority in dismissing the whole indictment with prejudice.